Re: Moderator - Re: iPad 4.2 (deploy to 3.2.2) error

2010-11-11 Thread Alastair Houghton
On 10 Nov 2010, at 19:00, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > Note: I am not an Apple's employee and have agreed/signed all NDAs. > > Now, although I agree with the above comment from Scott, if you haven't > signed an NDA specifically with Apple, how do you know when you're talking > about something that

Re: Moderator - Re: iPad 4.2 (deploy to 3.2.2) error

2010-11-11 Thread Alastair Houghton
On 10 Nov 2010, at 17:54, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote: > Only those who have actually signed an NDA with Apple are subject to this, > and they are certainly free to refrain from comment. > > Everyone else is free to talk, blog, and post about it how they please. Perhaps you could refrain from giving i

Re: Moderator - Re: iPad 4.2 (deploy to 3.2.2) error

2010-11-10 Thread Conrad Taylor
Sent from my iPad On Nov 10, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On Nov 10, 2010, at 10:24, Scott Ellsworth wrote: > [snip!] >>> >>> FYI -- An NDA or Non Disclosure Agreement (the third word being key) >>> requires two parties to agree to said terms. >>> >> >> Whether you signed an

Re: Moderator - Re: iPad 4.2 (deploy to 3.2.2) error

2010-11-10 Thread Murat Konar
Simple. If it's not been released yet, don't talk about it. _murat On Nov 10, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Laurent Daudelin wrote: [snip] > ...how do you know when you're talking about something that it's under NDA or > not? For example, I have seen already a few walkthrough of and information > about

Re: Moderator - Re: iPad 4.2 (deploy to 3.2.2) error

2010-11-10 Thread Laurent Daudelin
On Nov 10, 2010, at 10:24, Scott Ellsworth wrote: [snip!] >> >> FYI -- An NDA or Non Disclosure Agreement (the third word being key) >> requires two parties to agree to said terms. >> > > Whether you signed an NDA with Apple or not, the list rules include not > discussing NDA item here. Note:

RE: Moderator - Re: iPad 4.2 (deploy to 3.2.2) error

2010-11-10 Thread Flavio Donadio
Shawn, Nice try, but to download the aforementioned SDK you need to agree to Apple Developer Program terms. One of these terms is to not reveal non-public information. Also, this list is sponsored by Apple. I don't think you should do that here. Cheers, Flavio On 10/11/2010, at 15:54, Shawn

Re: Moderator - Re: iPad 4.2 (deploy to 3.2.2) error

2010-11-10 Thread Scott Ellsworth
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote: > > > Only those who have actually signed an NDA with Apple are subject to this, > and they are certainly free to refrain from comment. > > Everyone else is free to talk, blog, and post about it how they please. > Note: I am not an Apple empl

RE: Moderator - Re: iPad 4.2 (deploy to 3.2.2) error

2010-11-10 Thread Shawn Bakhtiar
Only those who have actually signed an NDA with Apple are subject to this, and they are certainly free to refrain from comment. Everyone else is free to talk, blog, and post about it how they please. FYI -- An NDA or Non Disclosure Agreement (the third word being key) requires two parties to