On 1-Dec-09, at 3:21 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ben Haller wrote:
This is interesting to me, since I am in fact using @public and ->
with
some ivars to allow faster use of one of my classes. (Yes, I've
confirmed
that this is significant in Sampler; it is, in f
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ben Haller
wrote:
> This is interesting to me, since I am in fact using @public and -> with
> some ivars to allow faster use of one of my classes. (Yes, I've confirmed
> that this is significant in Sampler; it is, in fact, quite a large
> percentage of the total
On 30-Nov-09, at 5:52 PM, Mike Abdullah wrote:
On 30 Nov 2009, at 21:33, Ben Haller wrote:
What I want is essentially a struct with methods; I need super-fast
access to ivars for clients of the class in some places in my
code. But I also want functionality provided by the class itself
vi
On 30 Nov 2009, at 21:33, Ben Haller wrote:
> On 30-Nov-09, at 4:06 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
>
>> On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Dennis Munsie wrote:
>>
>>> Not that I'm advocating it, but you can also declare a field as @public to
>>> allow you to access it via the -> operator. Of course, I
On Nov 30, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Ben Haller wrote:
> On 30-Nov-09, at 4:06 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
>> On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Dennis Munsie wrote:
>>
>>> Not that I'm advocating it, but you can also declare a field as @public to
>>> allow you to access it via the -> operator. Of course, I co
On 30-Nov-09, at 4:06 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Dennis Munsie wrote:
Not that I'm advocating it, but you can also declare a field as
@public to allow you to access it via the -> operator. Of course,
I could be missing some compiler magic going on behind the sc
On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Dennis Munsie wrote:
> Not that I'm advocating it, but you can also declare a field as @public to
> allow you to access it via the -> operator. Of course, I could be missing
> some compiler magic going on behind the scene as well, and it may not
> actually be the
Not that I'm advocating it, but you can also declare a field as @public to
allow you to access it via the -> operator. Of course, I could be missing
some compiler magic going on behind the scene as well, and it may not
actually be the same speed wise as @defs was.
Not to mention that it's just pl
On Nov 29, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Oftenwrong Soong wrote:
> What exactly is this @defs keyword supposed to do?
It effectively turned an Objective-C class declaration into a standard C
structure such that you could access the instance variables directly via a
simple -> operator. Was mostly used fo
On Nov 29, 2009, at 6:07 PM, James Pengra wrote:
The class Foo has a number of variables defined in its header. In
the code file Foo.m, and.preceding the @implementation block, the
following structure is defined:
typedef struct
{
@defs(Foo);
} getFoo;
Al
James,
What exactly is this @defs keyword supposed to do?
-Soong
- Original Message
From: James Pengra
To: cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 4:07:11 PM
Subject: Keyword @defs
Consider the following situation I found in a Cocoa program to simulate a
sine
Consider the following situation I found in a Cocoa program
to simulate a sine wave generator:
The class Foo has a number of variables defined in its
header. In the code file Foo.m, and.preceding the @implementation
block, the following structure is defined:
typedef struct
12 matches
Mail list logo
