On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
> Humph. So now what do I do? I'd rather not use one of my DTS tickets for
> this, especially as I feel like this should be documented, but maybe I have
> no choice.
>
> Anybody have any other guesses why this entitlement entry might be wrong
On Oct 25, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
> I forgot to mention: the entitlement is working as it is. Without it, I can't
> send mails from within the app. With the entitlement as written, I can send
> mails.
>
> Wouldn't the mail sending fail (be blocked by app sandbox) if the enti
On Aug 22, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>
>>
>> Ah, that explains why all of Apple's apps are sandboxed Right.
>
> The big ones are: Mail, Safari, Preview.
How about Finder? AddressBook? Calen
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:02 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
>>
>> But then, I haven't tried sandboxing yet. It sounds almost like some
>> exquisite form of BDSM: taking away all of your freedom and then making you
>> beg to get little bits back. Doe
On Aug 11, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
> On 12/08/2012, at 12:08 PM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>
>> As Greg Parker's comments are tangential to the issue I am raising, my point
>> is proven again.
>
>
> No they aren't.
>
> The fact is, t
On Aug 11, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
> On 12/08/2012, at 11:16 AM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>
>> Poor reading skills are keeping this thread alive.
>
>
> Well, indeed. I quote Greg Parker:
As Greg Parker's comments are tangential to the issue I am raisi
On Aug 11, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
> On 12/08/2012, at 4:18 AM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>
>> the porting guide currently states, which is that you may not want to move
>> to 64-bit
>
>
> What's so hard about moving to 64-bit anyway? The time you'
On Aug 11, 2012, at 11:50 AM, Alex Kac wrote:
> Apple's system is a mutually beneficial one but it also requires both parties
> to do their part. Apple probably does have a bug on this already, but unless
> you file one as well – and for that matter everyone else that knows about
> this – then
On Aug 11, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>> I say again, Apple's official 64-bit porting document states, right now,
>> that you may or may not want to move to 64 bit. If Apple is planning on
>> remo
On Aug 10, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
>> Tell me what exactly? That 32-bit is going away in 10.9? That doesn't
>> follow. That 32-bit will get dropped eventually? That was already obvious.
>
>
> It tells us that Apple is no longer putting effort into 32-bit, which in turn
> tell
On Aug 10, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
>> Not everyone uses ARC, or the other recent additions Apple has made to the
>> language.
>
> Yes, but the fact that everything new that Apple adds assumes that you're
> compiling for 64-bit only really ought to tell you something.
>>
Tell
On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:57 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2012, at 7:44 PM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>
>> Except Apple itself says it might not make sense to do so. From the 64-bit
>> Transition Guide:
>>
>> https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#d
On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
>> You won't get one. But between you and me, I would say it is highly
>> unlikely, since they'd kill MS Office support if they did that, and Office
>> is one of the two or three most important third-party apps on OS X.
>
> MS is, however, wor
On Aug 7, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>> Yes, and devs are also supposed to prefix their own methods to avoid exactly
>> this problem.
>
> And if your prefix clashes with the hidden one that Apple or another
> framework vendor chose, you're *still* SOL.
>
> Nope, we totally don't nee
On May 29, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Mikkel Islay wrote:
> Shipley argues from the pretense that App Sandboxing is a technology intended
> to shield the user form the intentions of the software developer. That is of
> course not the case. From the docs: "App Sandbox provides a last line of
> defense a
On Apr 17, 2012, at 1:28 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
> …having been using Objective C productively for over 10 years now, that I
> still find ARC something I have not needed. So far. I'm kinda hoping that
> remains true, because it actually seems pretty complicated in order to cover
> all the arcan
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
> I maintain that the better solution is for LS to keep both options open in
> the case of a conflict. Instead of guessing one or another, internally
> consider it something like “either public.objective-c-source or
> com.matlab.whatever” and
On Dec 14, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:05:38 +1100, BareFeetWare
> said:
>> 1. Apple Mail. If you reply to a messages containing multi-colored text, you
>> can edit that text.
>>
>> So my question is, how do they do it?
>
> Okay, I see now that there's a U
On Aug 10, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:31 AM, Alastair Houghton wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a bug to me. While zones are *discouraged* (they're very
>> definitely an advanced topic and easily misused), I don't think they're
>> actually deprecated.
>
> Their
On Apr 16, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>>
>> These kinds of preachy know-it-all rants are really tiresome, but
>> unfortunately they happen a lot on this list.
>
> They happen a lot on this list becaus
On Apr 16, 2010, at 12:22 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
> Don't.
>
> The only app that the user wants to empty the trash is Finder, not yours. If
> they want it emptied (or emptied securely), they'll go to the Finder and use
> the menu there. It's OK for your app to move stuff to the trash as long as
On Sep 8, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Marc Krochmal wrote:
Hi Brent,
I may have been one of those appalled Apple engineers. In general,
[NSHost currentHost] is the worst API on the system and people
should avoid it like the plague.
Hi Marc,
Can you tell why this is so?
Best,
__jayson
Circus
On Sep 2, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
For anyone interested (doesn't seem like anyone is, unfortunately) I
have worked out a solution which can only be described as an
inglorious hack. I have submitted a bug report requesting that
NSUndoManager is made (optionally) backwards compat
On Apr 27, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Jay Reynolds Freeman wrote:
Well, this is an interesting problem, because there are still
people running
Tiger out there, [snip]
Yes, but how many of the Tiger users are actually buying new software?
Most of t
On May 19, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Andy Lee wrote:
* Interface Builder is sometimes given as an example of an app
that would be more difficult to write in, say, Java.
It's not - I did this in a past life, with Control-drag to form
connections, "nib" archive files and all that.
Best,
__jays
25 matches
Mail list logo
