On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Quincey Morris
wrote:
> You haven't (IIRC) demonstrated that your app is not receiving memory
> warnings.
I implemented both the app delegate and view controller memory
warnings, then set breakpoints at both of them. The breakpoints don't
get hit.
> You probably
>> calloc() and malloc() are documented to return NULL when there isn't
>> enough memory to satisfy the user's request. Their implementation is
>> simply broken if they don't do that.
>
> Because calloc and malloc never return, they are not violating the spec.
>
> Nothing about the POSIX spec re
On Nov 10, 2011, at 18:03 , Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> I don't have a problem with the system killing runaway processes.
> What I have a problem with is that calloc() NEVER returns NULL. If it
> ever did, I would have plenty of opportunity to deallocate ALL of the
> memory I just allocated
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha
wrote:
> calloc() and malloc() are documented to return NULL when there isn't
> enough memory to satisfy the user's request. Their implementation is
> simply broken if they don't do that.
Because calloc and malloc never return, they are n
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> Read carefully: “If you allocate memory faster than the OS can re-claim it
> from other processes…” In other words, the system protects against apps that
> might've gotten trapped in an infinite loop of allocating memory. Better to
> kill th
On 10 Nov 2011, at 6:18 PM, Roland King wrote:
> Anyone else have recent experience of using DTS to answer questions this list
> can't? I fear this channel is now also swamped and has may be losing its
> usefulness.
Not sure how on-topic this is…
I have filed three DTS incidents in the last t
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Michael Hanna wrote:
> in an nscollectionview, I call setContent: every time I get a new item for
> the collection view. The annoying side-effect of this is that the whole
> view dims and brightens each time setContent: is called.. not visually
> appealing.
Are yo
Has anyone used a DTS support incident recently? I keep them as my magic
bullets for when I can't figure stuff out whatever I try. The last 2 I used I
got 2day turnaround and a great answer each time, my latest has been
languishing for a week untouched.
Anyone else have recent experience of us
in an nscollectionview, I call setContent: every time I get a new item for
the collection view. The annoying side-effect of this is that the whole
view dims and brightens each time setContent: is called.. not visually
appealing.
I've tried disabling CATransactions while calling setContent: but tha
On 11/11/2011, at 3:13 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> Graham - get over it, dude! Not because you're wrong, but because you're
> shaking your head about the *wrong* thing. You haven't seen the half of it
> yet. Just wait until the debug area (including the console) start popping up
> and down into
BIG, #AWESOME thanks to David Phillip Oster for getting us the room!!
Our November 17 7pm-9pm meeting will be at
Grand Teton Tech Talk Room,
GWC-2 (Google West Campus 2)
1501 Salado Dr.
Mountain View CA.
http://turbozen.com/cocoaheads/Grand%20Teton.jpg is a map of the
building, so you can see
The trivia isn’t Cocoa related. Please don’t post it to the list.
Greg is an expert in the core OS stuff, and the discussion was on topic.
It’s now way off topic.
Please stop the inappropriate aspects of the thread. Memory management is
complicated enough without adding irrelevant trivia.
Than
On 10 Nov 2011, at 17:52, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:33 AM, James Montgomerie wrote:
>
>> On 9 Nov 2011, at 17:33, Dave Camp wrote:
>>> This was discussed at a WWDC session a couple of years ago. If your app
>>> attempts to allocate a large block of memory, and the OS cannot get
On Nov 9, 2011, at 12:46 AM, Greg Parker wrote:
> Note that Shuttle missions carried ordinary laptops running ordinary
> operating systems to do the science work other than flying the spacecraft.
> The scientists couldn't afford Shuttle-grade development costs nor
> Shuttle-grade development sc
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:33 AM, James Montgomerie wrote:
>
>> On 9 Nov 2011, at 17:33, Dave Camp wrote:
>>> This was discussed at a WWDC session a couple of years ago. If your app
>>> attempts to allocate a large block of memory, and the OS cannot
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:33 AM, James Montgomerie wrote:
> On 9 Nov 2011, at 17:33, Dave Camp wrote:
>> This was discussed at a WWDC session a couple of years ago. If your app
>> attempts to allocate a large block of memory, and the OS cannot get other
>> processes to give up memory in a timely fa
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:33 AM, James Montgomerie wrote:
> On 9 Nov 2011, at 17:33, Dave Camp wrote:
>> This was discussed at a WWDC session a couple of years ago. If your app
>> attempts to allocate a large block of memory, and the OS cannot get other
>> processes to give up memory in a timely fas
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Richard Somers
> wrote:
>> I think they will eventually get it right. No way am I going back to Xcode 3.
>
> Xcode brought with it some massive improvements (workspaces with
> multiple projects!) at some serious
On 9 Nov 2011, at 17:33, Dave Camp wrote:
> This was discussed at a WWDC session a couple of years ago. If your app
> attempts to allocate a large block of memory, and the OS cannot get other
> processes to give up memory in a timely fashion, your app will be killed.
>
> It's the reverse of you
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Richard Somers
wrote:
> I think they will eventually get it right. No way am I going back to Xcode 3.
Xcode brought with it some massive improvements (workspaces with
multiple projects!) at some serious usability expense.
__
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> Sometimes it pops up a little way.
>
> Sometimes it pops up a long way.
>
> Sometimes it fails to pop.
>
> Sometimes it pops but when you stop the app it doesn't pop back down.
>
> It's non-deterministic programming!
Xcode animation!
I think
On Nov 9, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Andy O'Meara wrote:
> Well, if you have a serial number/license scheme, copy-protection scheme,
> crypto, or payment mechanisms that use objC, then realize they're on display
> for everyone to see.
Use functions instead of a class to restrict the amount of informatio
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:11:25 +1100, Graham Cox said:
>Thanks, that's got it.
>
>I dunno
XCode
what the hell happened to you? *shakes head*
>
Graham - get over it, dude! Not because you're wrong, but because you're
shaking your head about the *wrong* thing. You haven't seen the half of it yet.
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:56:03 -0800, Ben Kennedy said:
>>From
>>http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/uikit/reference/UITapGestureRecognizer_Class/Reference/Reference.html
>> :
>
>> Although taps are discrete gestures, they are discrete for each state of the
>> gesture recognizer;
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:05:55 -0500, David Hoerl said:
>when I set "contentInset" that contentOffset was getting set to
>0,0.
>
>Is this known behavior (or desired behavior?)
Don't beat yourself up over this. You figured it out (well done!), the
workaround is obvious, and now you can move on. Bu
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:32:46 +0100, Olivier Palliere
> said:
>> I have a UITextField on a view. I want the user to be able to edit it by
>> single tapping on it, but I want to display a popover to chose from a list
>> when the user does a lon
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:59:59 +0530, Sasikumar JP said:
>Is it possible to set the iPad minimum deployment target as iOS 5 and iPhone
>deployment target as ios 4.2
I don't think so. Most apps that I'm familiar with, if they have issues like
this, simply have two different apps. m.
--
matt neubu
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:32:46 +0100, Olivier Palliere
said:
>I have a UITextField on a view. I want the user to be able to edit it by
>single tapping on it, but I want to display a popover to chose from a list
>when the user does a long press on the UITextfield.
>
>To do this, I added a LongPres
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 21:48:42 +0800, Roland King said:
>Is there any support for UIViewController containment with storyboarding?
Yes, but you have to careful about what you mean by "support". I see two
possible misapprehensions here:
1) The storyboard editor knows nothing your custom container
On 10 Nov 2011, at 21:22, Andreas Grosam wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 2:04 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
>
>
> So, in other words, you prefer "polymorphic runtime resolved" symbols over
> "compile-time resolved symbols" (like in C++).
Not saying that at all, and don't really agree with that. If a c
On 10 Nov 2011, at 21:13, Karl Goiser wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2011, at 12:04 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
>
>> It's the old I have a hammer so everything looks like a nail, but in C++'s
>> case it's I have a programming language, so everything gets put in that. We
>> really need to get away from that ki
The bundle identifier is the right thing to base your check on. Show us your
code and we'll be able to tell you if you're dong anything wrong
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Nov 2011, at 05:01 AM, Vaibhao Mahore
wrote:
> Hello,
>I would like to know best way to determine whether iTune
On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:54 PM, John Joyce wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Preston Sumner wrote:
>
>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 3:34 AM, Andreas Mayer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Tom Jeffries:
>>>
Mac.
>>>
>>> You will have to use your own subclass of NSButton.
>>
>>
On Nov 10, 2011, at 2:04 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
So, in other words, you prefer "polymorphic runtime resolved" symbols over
"compile-time resolved symbols" (like in C++).
I just don't understand, why this makes C++ namespace syntax ugly, and why you
still state that C++ namespace is inflexible
On 10/11/2011, at 12:04 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
> It's the old I have a hammer so everything looks like a nail, but in C++'s
> case it's I have a programming language, so everything gets put in that. We
> really need to get away from that kind of thinking about programming
> languages and get ba
35 matches
Mail list logo
