On 4 June 2013 01:02, Garrett Serack wrote:
> I have no problem with that.
>
> Really, if we want to support an option, that ends up being a custom pivot
> for that library... and obviously multiplies the package size out
> considerably.
>
>
I'm probably misunderstanding how this works, but why c
I have no problem with that.
Really, if we want to support an option, that ends up being a custom pivot for
that library... and obviously multiplies the package size out considerably.
G
-Original Message-
From: Coapp-developers
[mailto:coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft@li
2 matches
Mail list logo
