On 4 June 2013 01:02, Garrett Serack <garre...@microsoft.com> wrote: > I have no problem with that. > > Really, if we want to support an option, that ends up being a custom pivot > for that library... and obviously multiplies the package size out > considerably. > > I'm probably misunderstanding how this works, but why can't libpng for example, be an optional dependency for the SDL package?
It actually looks like Debian has the libraries set up as hard dependencies: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libsdl-image1.2 --Adam
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
