OK
I'll take them at the weekend.
I'll send them right away.
Cheers,
Niall
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Tom Buscaglia wrote:
> Pics please!
>
> At 03:12 PM 10/23/2013, you wrote:
>
> From: CnC-List [
> mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com]
> On Behalf Of ni
I Love the Quote. I'll check the GBS connection (just for verification).
My C&C is a 1988 C&C 41 with a wing keel. She is a very tough boat
and sails very well in anything from 7 knots or so and up to 20+ (apparent)
without reefing the main. As to the SA guy , f..k the begrudgers.
Niall
niall.j.buc
Heavy? I made mine from stainless steel!!!
Works great and a lot lighter than the other things up front e.g.
anchor and 200 ft of chain. If you do find a source of the CF tube I'd
love to know about it.
Niall
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pete Shelquist
wrote:
> I’m still exploring the additi
For some reason there is put forward the notion that we are discussing C&C
44's !
The Navy 44's reviewed in Practical Sailor were designed by David Pedrick.
Niall C&C 41, Ardea 11.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:48 PM, bobmor99 . wrote:
> Practical Sailor says...
> " ...Designed by David Pedrick, th
Hi Rick,
Thank you for that helpful article.
I have a question for you. Really, I should be able to figure the answer out
based on all of the back and forth on winterizing. Anyway, here is the
question.
My engine is a 35 HP Yanmar. I live in Nova Scotia where the winters are
relatively mild by Cana
Tom,
Did you receive the bowsprit photos ?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 3:20 PM, TOM VINCENT wrote:
> In the spring of 1975 I purchased a new C&C 30 from Havre de Grace Marina
> in Maryland. It had a beautiful chocolate hull with a cameo deck. My
> understanding from the dealer is the boat was in a
...or something like that !!
Now, bear in mind that I am a recovering racer and have carbon main
and headsails.
Makes a difference and, after all, isn't your boat as special to you as
any AC vessel.
Niall Buckley.
CC41 Ardea 2
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:58 AM, David Knecht wrote:
> I was think
The main difference is that the new sails dont stretch and their shape is
factory engineered.
You will still adjust mail and genoa halyard tension according to
conditions. You will likely
not ever require a Cunningham ever again.
Have Fun.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Hoyt, Mike wrote:
> Me
aft forward. It can't do that on the kryptonite one!
> A bit more explaining please!
>
> sam :-)
>
> *From: *niall buckley
> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 3, 2013 4:31 PM
> *To: *cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Reply To: *cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Subject: *Re: Stus-List O
hat pulling the halyard on a sail
> that doesn't stretch do?
> sam :-)
>
>
> *From: *niall buckley
> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 3, 2013 5:59 PM
> *To: *cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Reply To: *cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Subject: *Re: Stus-List Old Sails Suck
>
> Sam,
&
Hello Harold,
I'm new to this Group so, don't know the format exactly.
I changed to high tech lines on all my halyards over the past few years.
My perceived advantages are as follows: less weight aloft (considerable,
maybe equivalent to a man on the rail),
much nicer on the hands if you need to ha
Hi I designed and installed a SS removable sprit on my C&C 41.
Works like a charm.
I'll send you pics, if you like. Or you can shoot me some questions if you
like.
Cheers,
Niall.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Tom Buscaglia wrote:
> At the C&C rendezvous on Thetis Island in BC some of us we
12 matches
Mail list logo
