t; I took a look at Ogopogo, the 37+/4- in Fairhope,online. Since this
> string started with questions about the back stay on these boats, I was
> wondering about the set up on the one you're looking at. They seems to
> have been relocate inboard from their original location on the
#x27;re looking at. They seems to have been
>>> relocate inboard from their original location on the transom. I'm curious
>>> as to why this was done. Any idea or explanation given?
>>>
>>> GL with the purchase...I am a huge fan of the 37+/40!
>>
t; > > explanation given?
> > >
> > > GL with the purchase...I am a huge fan of the 37+/40!
> > >
> > > Tom B
> > >
> > > > >
> >
> > Messa
> 2950 Breckenridge Lane, Suite Nine
> Louisville, Kentucky 40220-1462
> 502-584-7255
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Baldridge via CnC-List
> To: cnc-list
> Cc: Mark Baldridge
> Sent: Wed, Jan 4, 2017 3:21 pm
> Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Back
m a huge fan of the 37+/40!
>
> Tom B
>
> ------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:17:34 -0500
> From: Mark Baldridge
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
> Message-ID: &
io River, Mile 596;
Richard N. Bush
2950 Breckenridge Lane, Suite Nine
Louisville, Kentucky 40220-1462
502-584-7255
-Original Message-
From: Mark Baldridge via CnC-List
To: cnc-list
Cc: Mark Baldridge
Sent: Wed, Jan 4, 2017 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ B
40!
Tom B
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:17:34 -0500
From: Mark Baldridge
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
Message-ID: <6afc5ca3-ac75-7fc3-a725-64d0a88e0...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&q
49:37 + (UTC)
From: Bruce Whitmore
To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com"
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
Message-ID: <267782307.5706814.1483490977...@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello Everyone,
I wanted to
From: Michael Cotton via CnC-List
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Michael Cotton
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
I had A '90 37+. Port backstay failed in 20 to 25 kts of wind with a reefed
main and a 135% h
I saw Michael's boat, Blue Pearl. A 1990 37+. We detected the failure of
the backstay and were extremely cautious. The sale fell through for a
myriad of other deficiencies. When we inspected the boat we ended up
buying (Sea Hawk a 1989 37+ with the tall rig and wing keel) we inspected
the back
5.409.3660
On Dec 30, 2016, at 8:57 AM, cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com wrote:
---
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:48:18 -0500
From: Edd Schillay
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
Message-ID: <65d
years (until I sold
the boat).
From: Edd Schillay via CnC-List
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 11:48 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Edd Schillay
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
I’ve heard of one person on the list who had a problem.
I’ve had the Enterp
om wrote:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:48:18 -0500
>> From: Edd Schillay
>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>> Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
>> Message-ID: <65d
I’ve heard of one person on the list who had a problem.
I’ve had the Enterprise for 11 years now and don’t see any signs of wear, and I
have hydraulics, as well as used to race the boat pretty hard at times.
All the best,
Edd
Edd M. Schillay
Starship Enterprise
C&C 37+ | Sail No: NCC-1701-B
Bruce,
Both cockpit lockers on either side of the helm should give you plenty of
access to the backstay attachments. On the starboard side, you may need to pull
out the propane tank.
All the best,
Edd
Edd M. Schillay
Starship Enterprise
C&C 37+ | Sail No: NCC-1701-B
City Island, NY
Starshi
15 matches
Mail list logo
