The mailing list is about as standard and simple as it gets. In fact this
is a problem if you have your own domain and do things like DMARC
(combination of DKIM and SPF) or use some of the better "free" options.
What happens is that messages that get sent to the list are resent, however
the old s
Dick,
Are you sure you need to download your mail? I use only web mail and some
of my messages on shaw are several years old. (I must clean house
sometime!) Even better, my wife and each have gmail accounts which we use
most of the time and we never download. Right now I have 401MB on their
se
Thanks for all the help and suggestions... I hopefully solved the problem now.
There were 2 issues -
one was that bash comes with it's own pwd command
the other was that the coreutils pwd must have been corrupt somehow
After reinstalling coreutils, it appears to work correctly when explicitly
c
try renaming the one from coreutils to something else...and try
anew...if that works, then nuke for good...
On 2/9/06, Martin Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On February 9, 2006 14:13, Mark Carlson wrote:
> > On 2/9/06, Mark Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 2/9/06, Martin Glazer <[E
On February 9, 2006 14:13, Mark Carlson wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Mark Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/9/06, Martin Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Any ideas?
> >
> > Which shell are you using and have you tried using a different one?
> >
> > i.e. /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/pwd"
> > or /bin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you are using bash, it has a built in command called pwd. Type
'finger -m username'. You can also look in /etc/passwd to see what
shell your user is supposed to use.
There may be more than one version installed. What happens when you
type 'which
On 2/9/06, Mark Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Martin Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any ideas?
>
> Which shell are you using and have you tried using a different one?
>
> i.e. /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/pwd"
> or /bin/tcsh -c "/usr/bin/pwd"
>
> maybe you're in a chrooted environm
On 2/9/06, Martin Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any ideas?
Which shell are you using and have you tried using a different one?
i.e. /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/pwd"
or /bin/tcsh -c "/usr/bin/pwd"
maybe you're in a chrooted environment somehow? IIRC, some shells
have built-in "trivial" commands,
...Oh, gentoo is the distro build form source, right...
I still use slackware...
On 2/9/06, Juan Alberto Cirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you show a timestamp for pwd (the binary, I mean), along with pwd -v
>
> On 2/9/06, Martin Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I'm using a
Can you show a timestamp for pwd (the binary, I mean), along with pwd -v
On 2/9/06, Martin Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm using a gentoo system and it is failing during an update, however the
> problem exists at the command line. pwd appears to work when one just types
> it in, b
On Sunday 25 July 2004 19:48, Nick W wrote:
> > When I add the argument to convert the remote host to an IP then
> > the above is output like this (last -i) :
> >
> > dboydpts/0192.168.0.197Sun Jul 25 18:29 still logged in
> > root :0 64.151.1.64 Sun Jul 25 12:
On Monday 26 July 2004 01:48 am, Nick W wrote:
> On July 25, 2004 07:00 pm, Doug Boyd wrote:
> > I don't understand why the console is converted to an IP "64.151.1.64"
> > that I don't recognize.
>
> It looks like a shaw IP?
I tried "last -i" on my system and all the entries show an external machi
On July 25, 2004 07:00 pm, Doug Boyd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed on my server that the output from the command "last" is something
> like this:
>
> dboydpts/0mystationSun Jul 25 18:29 still logged in
> root :0 console Sun Jul 25 12:01 - 12:05 (00:04)
> r
On Thu April 8 2004 21:51, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Curtis Sloan:
> > On Thu April 8 2004 19:28, s. keeling wrote:
Thanks for the fstab thoughts, I'll look into that some more.
> Try comparing the output of "mount" for the various fs that
> are working correctly against what mount says
Incoming from Curtis Sloan:
> On Thu April 8 2004 19:28, s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from Curtis Sloan:
> > > I have one partition on one disk that the system believes is read-only.
> > > It is a FAT32 filesystem. The only thing different from the other FAT32
> > > partitions (I dual boot w/ W
On Thu April 8 2004 19:28, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Curtis Sloan:
> > I have one partition on one disk that the system believes is read-only.
> > It is a FAT32 filesystem. The only thing different from the other FAT32
> > partitions (I dual boot w/ Windows 98 for games) is that this part
Incoming from Curtis Sloan:
> I have one partition on one disk that the system believes is read-only. It is
> a FAT32 filesystem. The only thing different from the other FAT32 partitions
> (I dual boot w/ Windows 98 for games) is that this partition is primary,
What's its fstab entry?
--
A
17 matches
Mail list logo
