Hi,
On 04-07-12 05:02, guang wu wrote:
Hi everyone
who know how to get cloudstack3.0.3 or Apache 4.0.0 release?
www.cloudstack.org can download the latest release is 3.0.2,cloudstack
community no longer maintain or update? but the community Repositories(git)
provide cloudstack code is 3.0.3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5740/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
[Defect / Enhancement / New
hi,all
xenserver how to guarantee remount nfs primary storage after reboot?
where is the info recorded?
thanks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5718/
---
(Updated July 4, 2012, 10:36 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle
From: Pranav Saxena
---
ui/css/cloudstack3.css |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ui/css/cloudstack3.css b/ui/css/cloudstack3.css
index 6a09174..4c43a08 100644
--- a/ui/css/cloudstack3.css
+++ b/ui/css/cloudstack3.css
@@ -7484,7 +7484,7 @@ div.panel.ui-dial
Hi all ,
I had an issue while creating a review request for the patch I tried to upload
, while I made some changes to CSS files and messages.properties file. I work
on my private branch and then generate a patch using "gitg "and then apply it
to the apache 3.0.x branch (git am ) . Finally whe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5742/
---
(Updated July 4, 2012, 12:17 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5718/
---
(Updated July 4, 2012, 4:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5740/#review8875
---
This removes paramiko itself but there are still 'dependencies' on par
Can we add git tags for the 3.0.0, 3.0.1, and 3.0.2 releases? I realize they're
not ASF-blessed releases, but would be very handy for when folks want to grab a
particular release from the repo.
I think 3.0.0 is cf0a4e02743abb87b665ea585cb3cf1786c4d966? The zip file on
sf.net mentions bcc4833 bu
Yes, I have executed the below successfully:
ant build-all
package marvin
Thanks,
Pradeep.S
From: David Nalley [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of David Nalley
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:19 PM
To: cloudstack; David Nalley; Pradeep Soundararajan
Subject: Re: Review Request: [D
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:49 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> Can we add git tags for the 3.0.0, 3.0.1, and 3.0.2 releases? I realize
> they're not ASF-blessed releases, but would be very handy for when folks want
> to grab a particular release from the repo.
>
> I think 3.0.0 is cf0a4e02743abb87b665ea
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Pradeep Soundararajan <
pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yes, I have executed the below successfully:
>
> ** **
>
> ant build-all
>
> package marvin
>
> ** **
>
>
>
Yes, I don't doubt that it builds, but does it run (and are you getting
parami
I don't think that tagging on the source code/repo level is a problem as
long as it is not announced as an Apache release or distributed under that
name
But they can merely be used as a tagged version of source code which
developers can use on their own responsibility
Also I believe it is better
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5762/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek.
Description
---
1) H
Sorry did go through your e-mail first
that another matter which totally code management and it is up to the CS
community decide about
I tried to address the Apache blesses releases part of the message
Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
On Jul 4, 2012 8:18 PM, "David Nalley"
On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:18 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:49 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>> Can we add git tags for the 3.0.0, 3.0.1, and 3.0.2 releases? I realize
>> they're not ASF-blessed releases, but would be very handy for when folks
>> want to grab a particular release from
Hi folks,
I spent a bit of time going through the patches directory and working
on license headers today.
Historically CloudStack has made a Debian-based systemvm template
available for each hypervisor. However, my sense is that going forward
we will not be able to do this because of licensing is
Hi folks,
I spent some time poking around in the tools directory.
There are a number of software packages in this directory, and I am
not sure that it is appropriate to have them there, and specifically
some of them are prohibited items.
I am proposing to delete the following directories:
ant
g
+1
Just noticed some of those myself and was wondering about that.
On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:20 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I spent some time poking around in the tools directory.
>
> There are a number of software packages in this directory, and I am
> not sure that it is appropriate to
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Yes - you need to update the jars on SSVM. If you stop and start the SSVM
> then it should get updated for you assuming that the MS has pushed the
> latest jars on the host.
Thanks Nitin.
Now I learned that the jar is updated by the cloud-ea
This question is basically for the community members managing git repo for
cloudstack.
There are community devs and other members interested in playing around or
provide patches for new features being offered in the upcoming release of
Xenserver Tampa.
It may not be a good idea to checkin such a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5762/#review8877
---
The 'else' condition checks for (info == null) but info is getting use
On 4 July 2012 23:49, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Pradeep Soundararajan <
> pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I have executed the below successfully:
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ant build-all
>>
>> package marvin
>>
>> ** **
>>
>>
>>
> Yes, I don't dou
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 04:20:35PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I spent some time poking around in the tools directory.
>
> There are a number of software packages in this directory, and I am
> not sure that it is appropriate to have them there, and specifically
> some of them are p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5742/#review8878
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On July 4, 2012, 12:17 p.m.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5766/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
When an instance is created
27 matches
Mail list logo
