RE: Moving third party dependencies to ASF approved licenses - jnetpcap

2012-06-18 Thread Pradeep Soundararajan
Thanks Edison and David. My build is successful now. I hope the first one JnetPcap can be removed now. Please review the patch which is attached and we can submit the same to ASF to commit Thanks, Pradeep.S -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Fr

RE: Nicira integration pre-review

2012-06-18 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Hey David, Thanks for the feedback, I've modified all license headers in my bits of the code. The phases we have currently identified together with Nicira are: 1) First integration, L2 networking only and single NVP setup for the entire cloud. This means a static configuration for the

FW: Moving third party dependencies to ASF approved licenses - jnetpcap

2012-06-18 Thread Pradeep Soundararajan
I think my attachment got stripped out. Resending the email with the attachment. -Original Message- From: Pradeep Soundararajan Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:33 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Moving third party dependencies to ASF approved licenses - jnetpcap

CloudStack and jenkins

2012-06-18 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Heya all, I'm trying to setup a Jenkins build of CloudStack here at the office, but I'm running into some trouble. I want to run the automated build using the setups found in the Jenkins-config project on github. It appears that this setup is also not working at the moment. The error messages

RE: SDN integration with CloudStack

2012-06-18 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Hey Salvatore, Did you have a chance to look at my NiciraNVP code? I tried to implement it with the same idea to use the isolation method to determine which Guru will respond. It would be nice if our ideas and code are more or less aligned. Cheers, Hugo -Original Message- From: Salvat

RE: Advice on SSVM network interfaces

2012-06-18 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, I've created an entry in Jira for this issue: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15308 dumps for all the VIFs of the SSVM are attached to the Jira entry itself. An Extract from the traces, obtained while trying to ping the address of secondary storage NFS share, is reported below. Pleas

RE: SDN integration with CloudStack

2012-06-18 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hugo, Unfortunately I did not yet find some time to review this code. I have earmarked some time during this week to have a look at it. Cheers and thanks again for contributing this code, Salvatore > -Original Message- > From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent

Re: Advice on SSVM network interfaces

2012-06-18 Thread Matthew Hartmann
On 6/15/2012 2:59 PM, Anthony Xu wrote: Hi Salvatore, > From your description, the ARP response is sent out through eth1, some switches may drop this kind of package, it expects to receive ARP response from the same port ARP request sent out. I think it is a bug, in this case, CloudStack shou

Private IP allocation

2012-06-18 Thread Diego Spinola Castro
Hi, i have a vsphere and xenserver cluster in same pod with cs 2.2.13. Looking in resources dashboard i figured out that there a lot of private ips allocated and it is incompatible with systemvm's number. i don't know what caused it but op_dc_ipaddress_alloc has at least three private ip for syst

Re: FW: Moving third party dependencies to ASF approved licenses - jnetpcap

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > I think my attachment got stripped out. Resending the email with the > attachment. Attachment might be too large - can you create a bug and attach it in Jira?

RE: FW: Moving third party dependencies to ASF approved licenses - jnetpcap

2012-06-18 Thread Pradeep Soundararajan
Yes, this task has been tracked via http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15281 where you can find that attachment as well. Thanks, Pradeep.S -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 7:42 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject:

RE: Cloudstack database PPT - 2.2.14

2012-06-18 Thread Alex Huang
When I post these, what I do is copy and paste the entire picture into the website and then I add the pptx as an attachment so others can make changes. That way, people can actually see the picture without powerpoint but can also make changes to the powerpoint if needed. --Alex > -Origina

Re: FW: Moving third party dependencies to ASF approved licenses - jnetpcap

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > Yes, this task has been tracked via > http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15281 where you can find that attachment > as well. > Awesome - as I noted in the bug - lets create sub-bugs under that one for each library, and can you r

Supported browsers

2012-06-18 Thread Olga Smola
Hi, Could you please tell me where can I find supported Browsers with versions? Best regards, Olga

Re: Supported browsers

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Olga Smola wrote: > Hi, > > Could you please tell me where can I find supported Browsers with versions? > > Best regards, > Olga I don't know that we've defined this yet for Apache CloudStack. Would you like to define it? What browsers/versions are you willing ma

Re: Private IP allocation

2012-06-18 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
On 6/18/12 6:36 AM, "Diego Spinola Castro" wrote: >Hi, i have a vsphere and xenserver cluster in same pod with cs 2.2.13. > >Looking in resources dashboard i figured out that there a lot of private >ips allocated and it is incompatible with systemvm's number. > >i don't know what caused it but op

RE: Supported browsers

2012-06-18 Thread Will Chan
I'm not sure if we have this anywhere but the general support browsers should be: IE7, IE8, IE9, FF latest, Safari latest, Chrome latest Will From: Olga Smola [olya.sm...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 9:17 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.

new committer: Wido den Hollander

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Wido den Hollander to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process.

RE: netinstall OS not working

2012-06-18 Thread Anthony Xu
The latest XenServer doesn't support install Centos 5.8 as PV VM from ISO due to CentOs 5.8 is released after latest XenServer release. If you are using XenServer 6.0.2, you can try below, 1. install CentOs 5.7 from ISO. 2. inside VM, execute "yum update" to CentOs 5.8 Cheers, Anthony > -O

RE: missing centos 5.8 and centos 6.2 options

2012-06-18 Thread Anthony Xu
When you upload CentOS 5.8 disk image as template , you can choose Redhat 5.5 as Guest OS type. But, right now, XenServer doesn't support install Centos 5.8 and Centos 6.2 from ISO, maybe next version of XenServer. Assume you are using XenServer 6.0.2. 1. centos 5.8 a. upload centos

RE: FW: Moving third party dependencies to ASF approved licenses - jnetpcap

2012-06-18 Thread Pradeep Soundararajan
I have created the sub-task for this. I will start tracking all these activities in its related sub-tasks. Could you please let me know how should I execute marvin against my build? Thanks, Pradeep.S -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, June 18, 20

RE: Advice on SSVM network interfaces

2012-06-18 Thread Anthony Xu
Hi Matthew, We added a storage network in 3.0.2, which is used for SSVM to access secondary storage. The issue you saw is introduced by this, which happens only when private network and storage network are using the same sub net. It is harmless, because the NIC for storage network is not used. I

RE: Regarding 3.0.3

2012-06-18 Thread Kevin Kluge
Lu, When Citrix submitted CloudStack to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) it also included the trademark. The trademark has not been assigned to the ASF yet, but Citrix is trying to operate as if it were. As a result Citrix had to create a new product name for the commercial (paid) softw

RE: System iso patch missing files in the latest ASF master

2012-06-18 Thread Edison Su
On master branch, build-console-proxy is missing when we build agent, that's why system.zip doesn't have scripts that under console-proxy/scripts. David, in you commit: 859e3673, makes the change. Need to fix it ASAP, or people can't create systemvm on master branch. > -Original Message-

Re: FW: Moving third party dependencies to ASF approved licenses - jnetpcap

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > I have created the sub-task for this. I will start tracking all these   > activities in its related sub-tasks. > Could you please let me know how should I execute marvin against my build? > > Thanks, > Pradeep.S > Prasanna: Can you

Re: System iso patch missing files in the latest ASF master

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Edison Su wrote: > On master branch, build-console-proxy is missing when we build agent, that's > why system.zip doesn't have scripts that under console-proxy/scripts. > David, in you commit: 859e3673, makes the change. Need to fix it ASAP, or > people can't crea

Re: System iso patch missing files in the latest ASF master

2012-06-18 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
On 6/18/12 10:47 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Edison Su wrote: >> On master branch, build-console-proxy is missing when we build agent, >>that's why system.zip doesn't have scripts that under >>console-proxy/scripts. >> David, in you commit: 859e3673, makes the cha

Re: System iso patch missing files in the latest ASF master

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
> > What was the reason for not including it to build-all? For me "all" sounds > like "build everything", and I expect system to work if I build with > build-all from scratch. > The reasons in my mind were: sysvms are not routinely rebuilt. building CP causes waf's build of RPMs to be problematic

Re: Project web site - task

2012-06-18 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 6/15/12 9:15 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, Thought I'd see if we could start a discussion on the project website. The details around this are here[1] That site should be here[2] but as you notice it's only the status page. Is anyone interested in working on this? I sadly am incapable of p

RE: Supported browsers

2012-06-18 Thread Alex Huang
Is that also the priority order or is there no priority order? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 9:21 AM > To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack- > d...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Supported br

Re: Supported browsers

2012-06-18 Thread Olga Smola
Hi, thanks David, Will. I'm going to test and then try to fix like you have written IE7, IE8, IE9, FF latest, Safari latest, Chrome latest. Main question was about IE start version. Best regards, Olga On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Is that also the priority order or is

Re: Nicira integration pre-review

2012-06-18 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
On 6/15/12 4:27 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hello Chiradeep, > >Thanks a lot for the review, comments inline. > >Cheers, > >Hugo > >-Original Message- >From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 8:56 AM >To: CloudStack DeveloperList >Cc: So

bare metal provisioning status

2012-06-18 Thread Walter, David
We have an applications that require bare metal provisioning and will likely need to support both bare metal and virtualized systems for both windows and linux systems. I see support code in the repository but not much conversation yet about bare metal. I heard there was some beta level testin

RE: Patches review

2012-06-18 Thread Ewan Mellor
> -Original Message- > From: Fred Wittekind [mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org] > > ... > >> Personally, I've always submitted patches via attaching them to bug > >> reports. Works well when I find a bug in something, don't have time > to > >> wait on anyone else to fix it, so I fix it myself

RE: Patches review

2012-06-18 Thread Adrian Cole
+1 gerrit, particularly as it helps avoid additional process mismatches for folks working in both openstack and cloudstack On Jun 18, 2012 2:07 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Fred Wittekind [mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org] > > > > ... > > > >> Personally, I've a

Building systemvm.iso misses some scripts?

2012-06-18 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, I don't know for sure if this is related to the other discussion regarding the systemvm ISO, but I'm experiencing something different. While building the systemvm ISO it seems that not all files are included. My console proxy and ssvm are missing "run.sh" and "_run.sh" in /usr/local/clou

Re: Patches review

2012-06-18 Thread John Kinsella
On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Fred Wittekind [mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org] >> >> ... >> >>> Personally, I've always submitted patches via attaching them to bug reports. Works well when I find a bug in something, don't have time >

Re: Easy task for folks looking to get involved

2012-06-18 Thread Chip Childers
I think we are getting close to being done with the ASF header updates. I completed 9 more folders, and triaged the remaining 8. The remaining 8 need review from whomever feels they know the history or status of those folders. I'm happy to make the header changes with guidance from more expert p

Re: Patches review

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Cole wrote: > +1 gerrit, particularly as it helps avoid additional process mismatches for > folks working in both openstack and cloudstack So while I like the thinking here, let me present the flip side of the coin. Reviewboard is what is used in a large nu

Re: Building systemvm.iso misses some scripts?

2012-06-18 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Hey Wido, What you are missing is the console-proxy that's mentioned already in an earlier thread. You need to build it and make sure to include it in the system vm. I just reverted the commit that removed it and that works for now. Cheers , Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 18 jun. 2012, at 22:1

RE: Patches review

2012-06-18 Thread Kevin Kluge
> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:20 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Patches review > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Cole > wrote: > > +1 gerrit, particularly as it helps avoid additional

Patch for review and merge into Apache master: Bug CS-15173

2012-06-18 Thread Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Hi Team, Please find attached the ASF master git patch for Bug CS-15173 (http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15173 ). Also, pasting the contents of the patch below for quicker review. Regards, Vijay >From 89753db2ef5411e81de6c28d57794d8acda87efd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vijayendra Bha

Patch for review and merge into Apache master: Bug CS-15181

2012-06-18 Thread Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Hi Team, Please find attached the ASF master git patch for Bug CS-15181 (http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15181 ). Also, pasting the contents of the patch below for quicker review. Regards, Vijay >From 890d5b14283c354eeba47d652f20478ce4e8030d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vijayendra Bha

Patch for review and merge into Apache master: Bug CS-15241

2012-06-18 Thread Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Hi Team, Please find attached the ASF master git patch for Bug CS-15241 (http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15241 ). Also, pasting the contents of the patch below for quicker review. Please note that this is not the fix for the bug's root cause but a fix for one of the issues found during i

Re: Patches review

2012-06-18 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:20 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Patches review >> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Cole >> wro

RE: System iso patch missing files in the latest ASF master

2012-06-18 Thread Nitin Mehta
Yes, please include it back in build-all. A lot of folks have already got upset because of this :). -Nitin -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 11:30 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; David Nalley; Fran

RE: Patches review

2012-06-18 Thread Ewan Mellor
> [Re ReviewBoard] > > I think it's low 'cost' to try it out. If no one objects in the next > day or so I'll request that we get CloudStack instance in reviewboard, > and we can try using it for a week or two and see if that is to our > liking. If there are specific problems that we find from a wor

RE: Nicira integration pre-review

2012-06-18 Thread Hugo Trippaers
-Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 8:23 PM To: CloudStack DeveloperList Cc: Somik Behera (so...@nicira.com) Subject: Re: Nicira integration pre-review On 6/15/12 4:27 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hello Chiradeep