Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2013-02-05 Thread David Nalley
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> But a user can certainly build their own, right? Apache CloudStack is >> just source code, and while the System VM that's hosted by Citrix is >> being provided to the users as a co

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2013-02-05 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > But a user can certainly build their own, right? Apache CloudStack is > just source code, and while the System VM that's hosted by Citrix is > being provided to the users as a connivence, there has to be a path > for a user to do the build

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2013-02-05 Thread Joe Brockmeier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/#review16154 --- Ship it! commit e81389a23efc687ed1ae4b738e0d0513a20e6ef9 Thanks! -

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-12-18 Thread Chip Childers
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Radhika PC wrote: > > >> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> > Hi Radhika, >> > >> > A couple of things: >> > >> > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an >> > option to provide a locally built version of the System

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-12-17 Thread Radhika PC
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2012, 10:08 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley,

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-12-17 Thread Radhika PC
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi Radhika, > > > > A couple of things: > > > > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an > > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this > > possible? The patch doesn't address that

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-12-17 Thread Radhika PC
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi Radhika, > > > > A couple of things: > > > > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an > > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this > > possible? The patch doesn't address that

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-12-12 Thread Joe Brockmeier
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi Radhika, > > > > A couple of things: > > > > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an > > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this > > possible? The patch doesn't address that

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-12-12 Thread Radhika PC
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi Radhika, > > > > A couple of things: > > > > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an > > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this > > possible? The patch doesn't address that

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-12-09 Thread Radhika PC
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi Radhika, > > > > A couple of things: > > > > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an > > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this > > possible? The patch doesn't address that

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-12-09 Thread Joe Brockmeier
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi Radhika, > > > > A couple of things: > > > > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an > > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this > > possible? The patch doesn't address that

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-10-31 Thread Radhika PC
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi Radhika, > > > > A couple of things: > > > > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an > > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this > > possible? The patch doesn't address that

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-10-31 Thread Joe Brockmeier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/#review12975 --- Hi Radhika, A couple of things: - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-10-30 Thread Radhika PC
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/ --- (Updated Oct. 31, 2012, 6:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley,

Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

2012-10-30 Thread Radhika PC
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/ --- Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.