> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi Radhika, > > > > A couple of things: > > > > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an > > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this > > possible? The patch doesn't address that. > > - "If you are using a separate NFS server, perform this step." Which step? > > I'm unclear which step I should or shouldn't perform. Is this unmounting > > the NFS server? > > - Does the cloud-install-sys-tmplt script mount NFS for the user? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Joe > > Radhika PC wrote: > Thank you Joe. I will look into his.
Any progress on this one? - Joe ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/#review12975 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 31, 2012, 6:36 a.m., Radhika PC wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 31, 2012, 6:36 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica > Tomechak. > > > Description > ------- > > Added a note that Citrix is providing necessary binary package of the system > VM. > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-390. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/en-US/prepare-system-vm-template.xml 5ed78f7 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > patch cleanly applies. > > > Thanks, > > Radhika PC > >
