Hi folks,
It's been about a week since Review Board was stood up.
Anyone have any comments?
I have a couple - first compared to gerrit, ReviewBoard def lacks a
few features, though it's virtually zero effort for us to maintain. I
think it does provide a nice centralized place to look for patches
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> You can sign up for an account on reviews.a.o -
>> I haven't figured out workflow, so I might submit a patch or two just
>> to see how it works.
>
> I added 8 more (license header upd
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> You can sign up for an account on reviews.a.o -
> I haven't figured out workflow, so I might submit a patch or two just
> to see how it works.
I added 8 more (license header updates). It would be great if we
could use these to test the proc
>
>
> Created:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4939
>
> --David
This is done (Thanks to the fine folks in INFRA!)
You can sign up for an account on reviews.a.o -
I haven't figured out workflow, so I might submit a patch or two just
to see how it works.
--David
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Ewan Mellor
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> [Re ReviewBoard]
>> >>
>> >> I think it's low 'cost' to try it out. If no one objects in the next
>> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Ewan Mellor
> wrote:
>
> >> [Re ReviewBoard]
> >>
> >> I think it's low 'cost' to try it out. If no one objects in the next
> >> day or so I'll request that we get CloudStack instance in
> r
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> [Re ReviewBoard]
>>
>> I think it's low 'cost' to try it out. If no one objects in the next
>> day or so I'll request that we get CloudStack instance in reviewboard,
>> and we can try using it for a week or two and see if that is to our
>>
> [Re ReviewBoard]
>
> I think it's low 'cost' to try it out. If no one objects in the next
> day or so I'll request that we get CloudStack instance in reviewboard,
> and we can try using it for a week or two and see if that is to our
> liking. If there are specific problems that we find from a wor
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:20 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Patches review
>>
>> On
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:20 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Patches review
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Cole
> wrote:
> > +1 gerrit,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
> +1 gerrit, particularly as it helps avoid additional process mismatches for
> folks working in both openstack and cloudstack
So while I like the thinking here, let me present the flip side of the coin.
Reviewboard is what is used in a large nu
On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Fred Wittekind [mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org]
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> Personally, I've always submitted patches via attaching them to bug
reports. Works well when I find a bug in something, don't have time
>
+1 gerrit, particularly as it helps avoid additional process mismatches for
folks working in both openstack and cloudstack
On Jun 18, 2012 2:07 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Fred Wittekind [mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org]
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> Personally, I've a
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Wittekind [mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org]
>
> ...
>
>> Personally, I've always submitted patches via attaching them to bug
> >> reports. Works well when I find a bug in something, don't have time
> to
> >> wait on anyone else to fix it, so I fix it myself
On 14/06/2012, at 1:09 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> So I have seen a lot of folks who use this approach, but that
>>> typically means that the mailing list gets cced on every action in the
>>> bugtracker. (mailing lists are where everything happens in Apache
>>> projects) We are already on track t
gt; Subject: Re: Patches review
>
> On 6/12/2012 4:01 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
> > wrote:
> >> I know it's been discussed in several email threads, but I would like
> to
> >> initiate a separate discussion
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Fred Wittekind
wrote:
> On 6/13/2012 10:25 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Fred Wittekind
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/12/2012 4:01 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> I know it's
On 6/13/2012 10:25 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Fred Wittekind
> wrote:
>> On 6/12/2012 4:01 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>>> wrote:
I know it's been discussed in several email threads, but I would like to
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Fred Wittekind wrote:
> On 6/12/2012 4:01 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>> wrote:
>>> I know it's been discussed in several email threads, but I would like to
>>> initiate a separate discussion on what tool we should
On 6/12/2012 4:01 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
> wrote:
>> I know it's been discussed in several email threads, but I would like to
>> initiate a separate discussion on what tool we should use for reviweing
>> the patches.
>>
>> Several people (inclu
l Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 1:02 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Patches review
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
> wrote:
> > I know it's been discussed
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> I know it's been discussed in several email threads, but I would like to
> initiate a separate discussion on what tool we should use for reviweing
> the patches.
>
> Several people (including myself - using Outlook on Mac OS X Lion) have
+1 to use some tool for review rather than using emails.
I am struggling with email patches through Outlook still and haven't found a
clean solution yet.
I have no personal experience but have heard about Gerrit being good to achieve
what is being listed below by Alena.
-Prachi
-Original
23 matches
Mail list logo
