: Monday, August 13, 2012 7:17 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
Unfortunately this caught my eye.
" n disabled existing local storages are not removed but any new local storage
is not added."
This qualifies as interference. Clou
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Patton [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 6:47 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
>
> Unfortunately this caught my eye.
> " n dis
Unfortunately this caught my eye.
" n disabled existing local storages are not removed but any new local storage
is not added."
This qualifies as interference. Cloud software must always reflect reality.
This whole distinction between root or data being allowed as local was none of
CS' business
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 6:38 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
Its already there. http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14277
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012
Its already there. http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14277
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 5:08 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
Ok. Can you please file a
Ok. Can you please file a feature request for the same to track it ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:24 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
Put up on reviewborad https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/. Please review and
provide feedback.
Implementation based on [1] below. The hierarchical configuration that was
discussed for enabling local storage support at multiple levels
(pod/cluster/host) can be added as another checkin.
Thanks,
Ko
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
> Good suggestion David. The only downside about this is since the config is at
> multiple level the user hopefully shouldn't get confused figuring out the
> inheritance.
>
> -Koushik
>
Yes, and how behavior should be if it does use inheritance
AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local storage support for data volumes
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Koushik Das wrote:
> Edison,
> Enabling/disabling local storage at host level is a good option for a small
> deployment where the number of host is < 20-30. For a
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Koushik Das wrote:
> Edison,
> Enabling/disabling local storage at host level is a good option for a small
> deployment where the number of host is < 20-30. For a large deployment
> configuring this for each host is not a very clean experience from the admin
> p
age pools won't get added.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 1:35 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
> -Original Message-
> Fro
> -Original Message-
> From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:18 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
>
> David - I think the cluster is supposed to be ho
m: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:22 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local storage support for data volumes
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Can we not provide the flexibility while adding a host. So when the admin
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Can we not provide the flexibility while adding a host. So when the admin
> adds a host he has the provision of enabling/disabling local storage for that
> host. I think that is the lowest level of granularity that we can provide to
> the a
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
I think it is always better to give control to the administrator on whether to
enable/disable local storage in a cluster/zone level. If local storage pool is
available by default then it may be difficult
On 07/30/2012 02:40 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is a
global setting (use.local.storage).
-Koushik
Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't this at the cluster level
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
>> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
>> a global setting (use.local.storage).
>>
>> -Koushik
>>
>Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't this at the cluster level?
>
>--David
+1 . It makes more se
storage support for data volumes
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:04 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
>
> Yes the idea is to have loc
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local storage support for data volumes
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
>> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:04 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
>
> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
>> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
>> a global setting (use.local.storage).
>>
>> -Koushik
>>
>
> Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't thi
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
> a global setting (use.local.storage).
>
> -Koushik
>
Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't this at the cluster level?
--David
Subject: Re: Local storage support for data volumes
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:23:44AM -0400, Koushik Das wrote:
> Currently in CS only root volume can be created on local storage.
> This feature is to support creation of data volumes on local storage.
> Please refer to [1] for the details.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:23:44AM -0400, Koushik Das wrote:
> Currently in CS only root volume can be created on local storage.
> This feature is to support creation of data volumes on local
> storage. Please refer to [1] for the details. There is already a bug
> CS-14277 created for this. Reviews
24 matches
Mail list logo
