RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-19 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 10:39 AM > To: Chip Childers > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge > > Chip, >

RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Alex Huang
nal Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 10:51 AM > To: Alex Huang > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge > > On Feb 15, 2013, at

Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Chip Childers
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Chip, > > We should spell out the expectations because the community has been evolving > in how it's behave. It is already difficult for people to follow the emails > then how can we expect them to follow consensus reach inside those emails. >

RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Alex Huang
nal Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 10:23 AM > To: Alex Huang > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge > > On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:16 PM,

Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Chip Childers
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:16 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > This should be on wiki somewhere. > > It is not enough to reach a consensus on the ML for code collaboration and > community behavior. Please record this decision as a guideline on the > community topic on the wiki. Think about how new people o

Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Chip Childers
anyone that's been around to have missed it. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 9:46 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: Brian Federle >> Subje

RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Alex Huang
possibly know this decision. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 9:46 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Brian Federle > Subject: RE: License issue for js file fro

RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
7 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Brian Federle > Subject: Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:21:57PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi Brian for you commit on master, can you fix the license for > > u

RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Pranav Saxena
Thanks Chip for handling that. -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 8:57 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Brian Federle Subject: Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge On Thu, Feb 14, 2013

Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-15 Thread Chip Childers
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:21:57PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Brian for you commit on master, can you fix the license for > ui/lib/require.js? > It suggests an external depedency require.js from Dojo Foundation. We > need to attribute them in LICENSE and fix other files so rat won't > complain.

Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-14 Thread Chip Childers
t; Cc: Brian Federle > > Subject: Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:38:11PM +0530, Pranav Saxena wrote: > > > Yeah right now the require.js file merged has this license - > > > > > > /** vim: et:ts=4:sw=4:sts

RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-14 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:10 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Brian Federle > Subject: Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge > > On Thu, Fe

Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-14 Thread Chip Childers
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:38:11PM +0530, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Yeah right now the require.js file merged has this license - > > /** vim: et:ts=4:sw=4:sts=4 > * @license RequireJS 2.1.2 Copyright (c) 2010-2012, The Dojo Foundation All > Rights Reserved. > * Available via the MIT or new BSD li

Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-14 Thread David Nalley
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Yeah right now the require.js file merged has this license - > > /** vim: et:ts=4:sw=4:sts=4 > * @license RequireJS 2.1.2 Copyright (c) 2010-2012, The Dojo Foundation All > Rights Reserved. > * Available via the MIT or new BSD license. >

Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-14 Thread Rohit Yadav
No, the file suggests this was already work of the requirejs project from "The Dojo Foundation" with their licenses. Since MIT license is available, it's compatible AL, but we still need to attribute them in LICENSE. Regards. On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Yeah right now

RE: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge

2013-02-14 Thread Pranav Saxena
Yeah right now the require.js file merged has this license - /** vim: et:ts=4:sw=4:sts=4 * @license RequireJS 2.1.2 Copyright (c) 2010-2012, The Dojo Foundation All Rights Reserved. * Available via the MIT or new BSD license. * see: http://github.com/jrburke/requirejs for details */ //Not us