On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:10 AM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: Brian Federle > > Subject: Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:38:11PM +0530, Pranav Saxena wrote: > > > Yeah right now the require.js file merged has this license - > > > > > > /** vim: et:ts=4:sw=4:sts=4 > > > * @license RequireJS 2.1.2 Copyright (c) 2010-2012, The Dojo Foundation > > > All > > Rights Reserved. > > > * Available via the MIT or new BSD license. > > > * see: http://github.com/jrburke/requirejs for details */ //Not > > > using strict: uneven strict support in browsers, #392, and causes > > > //problems with requirejs.exec()/transpiler plugins that may not be > > > strict. > > > /*jslint regexp: true, nomen: true, sloppy: true */ /*global window, > > > navigator, document, importScripts, jQuery, setTimeout, opera * > > > > > > > I'm assuming that we have consensus that this script should be added, unless > > anyone objects. > > > > I'll look at fixing the legal docs, but please try to warn before adding > > something > > new next time. > > > [Animesh>] Certainly we need to check the licensing before we add new > dependencies. How do we handle this particular issue?
Well, the info needs to go into the tools/whisker/descriptor*.xml files, and we need to re-generate the LICENSE and NOTICE at the top and in the whisker folder. We also need to add this file to the root pom's RAT exclude list. Like I said, I'll look at doing it if people want. I'll be able to do it tomorrow morning EST. -chip
