RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Rohit Yadav
} Regards. From: Nitin Mehta [nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 9:08 AM To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query Hi Rohit, I didn't understand the rationale behind this.

Re: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Nitin Mehta
lidated. >> >> Will >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:44 PM >>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.

RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Alex Huang
stack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query > > > > Sorry I don't understand why it needs to be a vote. Why can't we just offer > > a flag to turn it on and off? > >

RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Kelcey Damage (BT)
trix.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:44 PM >>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query >>> >>> Sorry I don't understand why it

Re: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread David Nalley
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Alright, spoke with tsp on irc on testing methods etc. I fixed [1] the > apiserver to make it backward compatible; > > - For all pre 3.x apis, both uuid, internal id can be used, all pre 3.x apis > don't have since field in their annotation.

Re: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Rohit Yadav
loudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query >> >> Sorry I don't understand why it needs to be a vote. Why can't we just offer >> a flag to turn it on and off? >> >> --Alex >> >>>

RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Will Chan
be tested and validated. Will > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:44 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID st

Re: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 27-Dec-2012, at 12:44 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Sorry I don't understand why it needs to be a vote. Why can't we just offer > a flag to turn it on and off? This needs to be voted because I knew something was not right and the FS kept emphasising that UUIDs to be accepted. I knew it would br

RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Alex Huang
Sorry I don't understand why it needs to be a vote. Why can't we just offer a flag to turn it on and off? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:11 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloudsta

RE: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Will Chan
-1 You will end up breaking anyone that has written any scripts/plugins/apps on top of pre 3.x CS. Since UUID was introduced in 3.0, you should only accept the following: - All first class objects created before 3.0 should accept an normal internal ID. - All first class objects created after

Re: [VOTE] Enforcing UUID string in API query

2012-12-27 Thread Rohit Yadav
Forgot to mention, let's keep the voting period open till 7th Jan 2013 12:00 GMT, i.e. as a lot of people are offline. On 27-Dec-2012, at 12:11 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi, > > I'm asking for the community to vote if they want to enforce UUID string to > be used in parameters while querying a