In continuation to what Alex proposed, as a first step I am moving
out components that are not core to the CloudStack into a physically
separate jar's and in to a different projects. Please look at [1] for what
components are being moved and corresponding new location. Next few days I
will moving
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> As a packager, and a sysadmin, I really dislike how maven operates - I
>> understand why it is so popular with the dev crowd, but many of those
>> things that make it popular are reas
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> As a packager, and a sysadmin, I really dislike how maven operates - I
> understand why it is so popular with the dev crowd, but many of those
> things that make it popular are reasons for not using it IMO.
>
> And yes, ant is already in plac
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:14 AM, John Kinsella wrote:
> +1
>
> Zeroturnaround released an interesting report on the state of developer
> productivity, that showed maven as significantly more popular than ant, but
> personally ant seems a better soln to me.
>
> Plus - it's already in place. :)
>
+1
Zeroturnaround released an interesting report on the state of developer
productivity, that showed maven as significantly more popular than ant, but
personally ant seems a better soln to me.
Plus - it's already in place. :)
John
On Jun 19, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Actually I t
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> It looks like there's no objections to this proposal so I'm going to start
> work on this. It will be a bit of a mess during transition. Will try to
> keep changes to a minimal.
>
> --Alex
>
Outstanding - you're going to do this in a topic
truction anyway. (See
the thread about the Debian packages).
Wido
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:32 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules...
-Original Message
gt; To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules...
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartm...@tls.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:17 AM
> > To: clou
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartm...@tls.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules...
>
> On 6/5/2012 10:19 AM, Alex Huang wrot
On 6/5/2012 10:19 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
Great diagram! I have a silly question though, is there any particular reason
why cloud-orchestration was selected over cloud-management?
That's a good question. The management server is actually two parts. The
first part is the orchestration engine (
> Great diagram! I have a silly question though, is there any particular reason
> why cloud-orchestration was selected over cloud-management?
>
That's a good question. The management server is actually two parts. The
first part is the orchestration engine (cloud-orchestration). The second pa
Great diagram! I have a silly question though, is there any particular
reason why cloud-orchestration was selected over cloud-management?
Matthew
On 6/5/2012 7:53 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
It's a little hard to describe in text. Please see
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/New+Packaging+Pro
12 matches
Mail list logo
