On Jun 2, 2012, at 3:38 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> I think the consensus thus far has been to work in master - and
> eventually branch when we get close to release (I am thinking perhaps
> the RC timeframe). Feature development can continue moving forward via
> topic branches that stay closed based
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2012 02:22 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>
>
> Well, that's kind off a Citrix question. Is Citrix interested in
> having a public branch to work in? From a community perspective it
> woudl appear that only the ma
On 06/02/2012 02:22 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Well, that's kind off a Citrix question. Is Citrix interested in
having a public branch to work in? From a community perspective it
woudl appear that only the master branch is of interest plus any
feature branches that are public.
I don't get the Ci
> >>
> >> Well, that's kind off a Citrix question. Is Citrix interested in
> >> having a public branch to work in? From a community perspective it
> >> woudl appear that only the master branch is of interest plus any
> >> feature branches that are public.
> >
> > I don't get the Citrix question?
>
On 06/01/2012 10:55 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
On 06/01/2012 04:37 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Robert Schweikert
wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:35 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
The master branch hasn't diverged much from
Hi,
On 06/01/2012 04:37 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Robert Schweikert
wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:35 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
The master branch hasn't diverged much from the 3.0.x branch at this
point. I can't name any d
On 05/31/2012 01:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:35 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
The master branch hasn't diverged much from the 3.0.x branch at this
point. I can't name any divergence off the top of my head. I would expect
3.0
Hi
I agree that branching from a branch is not the way to go. But at the
same time I agree with David that we need to follow the rule:
- Release soon and release regularly
also I agree with David that next release must focus more on cleaning the
code or at least starting to clean the code
The
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:35 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>>
>> The master branch hasn't diverged much from the 3.0.x branch at this
>> point. I can't name any divergence off the top of my head. I would expect
>> 3.0.x to be more stable, but if there
On 05/31/2012 12:35 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
The master branch hasn't diverged much from the 3.0.x branch at this point. I
can't name any divergence off the top of my head. I would expect 3.0.x to be
more stable, but if there is another reason to go forth with master then I
wouldn't stop that
The master branch hasn't diverged much from the 3.0.x branch at this point. I
can't name any divergence off the top of my head. I would expect 3.0.x to be
more stable, but if there is another reason to go forth with master then I
wouldn't stop that for stability reasons.
> New features going
11 matches
Mail list logo
