This bug has some details of the optimizations done to HAProxy
configuration and the resulting performance
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-8350
On 6/7/12 7:22 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Paul Angus
>wrote:
>> Thanks Murali,
>>
>> I think they are questions
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Paul Angus wrote:
> Thanks Murali,
>
> I think they are questions that need some answers, otherwise we're just
> blindly guessing. The virtual routers don't give any performance information
> out so we can't monitor them directly to see when a NetScaler might be
r.apache.org
Subject: Re: NetScaler Best Practices
There isn't a best practice document. At this point I doubt if there could be
clear recommendation when a customer should move from virtual router to
NetScaler. Logically any customer that want high throughput or think software
load balanc
There isn't a best practice document. At this point I doubt if there could
be clear recommendation when a customer should move from virtual router to
NetScaler. Logically any customer that want high throughput or think
software load balancer in virtual router will not fit their needs could
consider
Hi,
I'm looking for best practices with respect to:
a. when a client should be considering using a NetScaler for load balancing
rather than the virtual router
b. the capacity setting for any given NetScaler model.
I understand that it depends on the type of load that the virtual router or
NetS
