This bug has some details of the optimizations done to HAProxy configuration and the resulting performance http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-8350
On 6/7/12 7:22 AM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> >wrote: >> Thanks Murali, >> >> I think they are questions that need some answers, otherwise we're just >>blindly guessing. The virtual routers don't give any performance >>information out so we can't monitor them directly to see when a >>NetScaler might be appropriate. >> >> Fine-tuning capacity is ok, but we don't have a number to start with. >> > >We've got a number of folks who have modified the systemVMs to provide >perf info over SNMP for that reason - and I think there is a RFE for >that as well. > >--David
