sage-
>From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
>Sent: 13 December 2012 11:00 PM
>To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>Subject: Re: CentOS System Offering Thread
>
>Yes, it is for performance reasons.
>CentOS
> -has a different place for network init scripts -has a d
Centos also has a desirable file structure for many as well :)
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:34 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
1. Can you remind me
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:20 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
>>
>> The choice of 32-bit OS may be to support legacy servers, but I
>
XenServer supports grub2 since 5.6 fp1 version.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:00 PM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: CentOS System Offering Thread
>
donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:20 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
>>
>> The choice of 32-bit OS may be to support legacy servers, but I really
>> don't know.
>&
com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
>
> The choice of 32-bit OS may be to support legacy servers, but I really
> don't know.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
The choice of 32-bit OS may be to support legacy servers, but I really don't
know.
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: 13 December 2012 4:50 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
I did.. rev
M
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
WRT to CentOS. Did you survey the changes required?
Would be great to have these on a wiki page for future reference and history
tracking.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.ne
bit tends to be a little lean on memory - I understand.
>
> What was the reason for going with 32 bit OS on Debian Squeezy and not 64?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:20 AM
> To: cloudst
:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:20 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS System Offering Thread
Hi,
I created two Jira tickets about this about a month ago:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-450
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
Donal
See response in line..
>> 1. Can you remind me of the download link for the Wheezy systemVM? I've
>> only seen Squeeze.
I confused the names - I think - its squeeze - wheezy is the latest offering
with 3.x kernel. I guess b
Hi,
I created two Jira tickets about this about a month ago:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-450
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-451
They might be worth looking at!
Wido
On 12/12/2012 05:14 AM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
I'd like to resurrect this thread - as t
ix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:34 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
1. Can you remind me of the download link for the Wheezy systemVM? I've only
seen Squeeze.
2. In addition to a Debian system VM, I'd like to see one and only one Cen
do correct me if I'm wrong.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: 12 December 2012 8:06 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
Joe
Your point is clear and well taken. Nobody wants to be
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>snip
> Personally I'm more worried about the userspace/file structure differences
> than library or kernel versions when it comes to making an OS work as a
> system vm. Shell scripts that run iptables, wget, tar and ifconfig commands
> tend
?
Regards
-ilya
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:02 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS System Offering Thread
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012, at 11:32 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> This is pre
After the arp issues I had with the current system vm(VR) when behind an RHEL
FW using arp for IP clustering, having the option of a centos VR would be great.
Mixed Linux distro environments can sometimes have unforeseen consequences. And
if a shop is totally RHEL, then forcing them to use non R
I agree, I'm definitely not on the side of supporting CentOS, Arch, or
whatever version of system VM an admin wants, it would be a nightmare for
the people who maintain the systemvm scripts. That's what I was attempting
to say. But I do think that it should be documented well enough that people
who
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012, at 11:32 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> This is pretty important. Anyone should be able to roll their own,
> rather
> than relying on a single potentially out-of-date image. It seems like it
> would be pretty simple and straightforward on the face of it, however
> many
> of the
om]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 4:48 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
Is ./patches/systemvm/debian/buildsystemvm.sh what you're looking for?
It targets Debian Squeeze and includes the latest security updates.
I'd be keen to kn
Thank you Mice.
I've seen this before. This doc is more to modify/customize existing template
and not how to create one from scratch.
Regards
ilya
Mice Xia wrote:
http://docs.cloudstack.org/Knowledge_Base/Customizing_system_VMs
there is a doc online describing how to customize system vm templ
http://docs.cloudstack.org/Knowledge_Base/Customizing_system_VMs
there is a doc online describing how to customize system vm template.
mice
在 2012年12月12日星期三，Musayev, Ilya 写道：
> I'd like to resurrect this thread - as the other thread got carried away
into Vyatta conversation.
>
> My reasoning b
lto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 December 2012 5:33 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS System Offering Thread
This is pretty important. Anyone should be able to roll their own, rather than
relying on a single potentially out-of-date image. It seems like it would be
pre
This is pretty important. Anyone should be able to roll their own, rather
than relying on a single potentially out-of-date image. It seems like it
would be pretty simple and straightforward on the face of it, however many
of the scripts have been written specifically for Debian. I'd honestly be
ok
I'd like to resurrect this thread - as the other thread got carried away into
Vyatta conversation.
My reasoning behind this move - is due to e1000 bug that affects Debian Wheezy,
vSphere 5.0 (and possibly newer 5.1) and the router VM in Advanced Network
Zone. While I could spent lots of time tr
25 matches
Mail list logo
