Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-11-13 Thread Chip Childers
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >> So... thoughts? Anyone willing to "own" the 4.0 branch during it's >> support lifetime? > > So, assuming you & David are willing to mentor on this, I'd be happy to > take th

Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-11-13 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > So... thoughts? Anyone willing to "own" the 4.0 branch during it's > support lifetime? So, assuming you & David are willing to mentor on this, I'd be happy to take this on for 4.0.1 and through the rest of the lifecycle. Best,

RE: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-11-13 Thread Rohit Yadav
] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:12 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > I've only one concern, if we go for a 4.0.1 bugfix release, since there are a > lot of chang

Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-11-13 Thread David Nalley
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > I've only one concern, if we go for a 4.0.1 bugfix release, since there are a > lot of changes in build system and packaging on master, simply cherry picking > may not work. > I would like to suggest that we drive all our engineering efforts

RE: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-11-13 Thread Rohit Yadav
ajor feature or backward compatibility breaking change on master. Flames, thoughts? Regards. From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:10 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branc

Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-11-12 Thread Chip Childers
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Since I just started up the conversation about timing of feature > releases, I wanted to start the discussion on how we want to decide > what goes into the 4.0 branch and when we would pull the trigger on a > 4.0.X bug-fix release

Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-11-12 Thread Chip Childers
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >> So... thoughts? Anyone willing to "own" the 4.0 branch during it's >> support lifetime? > > Hmm. Have we decided what the support lifetime for the 4.0 branch is? > Will it s

Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-11-01 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > So... thoughts? Anyone willing to "own" the 4.0 branch during it's > support lifetime? Hmm. Have we decided what the support lifetime for the 4.0 branch is? Will it simply be until 4.1.0 is released, or are we going to try to have

Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-10-31 Thread Chip Childers
See below: - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >> Since I just started up the conversation about timing of feature >> releases, I wanted to start the discussion on how we want to decide

Re: [DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-10-31 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Since I just started up the conversation about timing of feature > releases, I wanted to start the discussion on how we want to decide > what goes into the 4.0 branch and when we would pull the trigger on a > 4.0.X bug-fix release pro

[DISCUSS][ASFCS40] 4.0 Branch Lifecycle

2012-10-31 Thread Chip Childers
Hi all, Since I just started up the conversation about timing of feature releases, I wanted to start the discussion on how we want to decide what goes into the 4.0 branch and when we would pull the trigger on a 4.0.X bug-fix release process. Personally, I don't have a particularly strong opinion