Hi all,

Since I just started up the conversation about timing of feature
releases, I wanted to start the discussion on how we want to decide
what goes into the 4.0 branch and when we would pull the trigger on a
4.0.X bug-fix release process.  Personally, I don't have a
particularly strong opinion about when we cut bug fix releases, but I
do strongly feel that we should have one or two committers that are
the "masters" of the 4.0 branch.  We should be very careful about what
goes in there from now on, with a focus on (1) security issues, (2)
high priority bugs, and (3) bugs that might be minor, but really annoy
the heck out of our users.

So...  thoughts?  Anyone willing to "own" the 4.0 branch during it's
support lifetime?

-chip

Reply via email to