]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:16 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> +1 I'm fine with the proposed schedule as well, but few of my questions were
> not a
ard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:53 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>>
>> Taking everyone's input into considera
n with 4.1.
Regards.
From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:53 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:28 PM,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
>
> Taking everyone's input into consideration, I've reworked the proposed
> schedule (below). I've extended the feature dev period until the end
> of Jan, giving us a 5 month (3 for features, 2 for testing / wrap-up)
> schedule for this next
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> Taking everyone's input into consideration, I've reworked the proposed
> schedule (below). I've extended the feature dev period until the end
> of Jan, giving us a 5 month (3 for features, 2 for testing / wrap-up)
> schedule for this
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> Following up on the previous thread about this topic, I'd like to
>> propose the following release calendar for our next feature release.
>>
>> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Following up on the previous thread about this topic, I'd like to
> propose the following release calendar for our next feature release.
>
> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2 assumptions
> right now. First, that we sh
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/2/12 8:48 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>One "rule" I'd like to propose, though: We shouldn't be landing any
>>features without at least rudimentary documentation.
>
>>
> +1. Also a Jira ticket so QA can close it as verifi
dStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
>
>
>
> On 11/2/12 8:48 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>One "rule" I'd like to propose, though: We shouldn't be landing any
>>features
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
This schedule gives us only 7 weeks from today to develop features, and of that
time most committers will be offline for a week or two due to holidays. Some
features have already been developed, but I don't think, relat
nes on 4.1
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 6:54 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
That's cool. The times involved were much less imp
s [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 9:32 AM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
> >
> > On Nov 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >
> > > On 2 November 2012 03:07, Chip Chi
gt; Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
>
> On Nov 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > On 2 November 2012 03:07, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >
> >> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2 a
D'oh! Heh. Thanks.
On 3 November 2012 16:32, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > On 2 November 2012 03:07, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >
> >> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2 assumptions
> >> right now. First, that we should adopt
On Nov 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> On 2 November 2012 03:07, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2 assumptions
>> right now. First, that we should adopt semantic versioning for our
>> versioning scheme. Second, that our next feature
On 2 November 2012 03:07, Chip Childers wrote:
> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2 assumptions
> right now. First, that we should adopt semantic versioning for our
> versioning scheme. Second, that our next feature release will be
> backward compatible with 4.0.0-incubat
DeveloperList
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
On 11/2/12 8:48 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>
>
>One "rule" I'd like to propose, though: We shouldn't be landing any
>features without at least rudimentary documentation.
>
On 11/2/12 8:48 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>
>
>One "rule" I'd like to propose, though: We shouldn't be landing any
>features without at least rudimentary documentation.
>
+1. Also a Jira ticket so QA can close it as verified.
I think we need criteria as to when is a feature "ready"?
We don
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:07:12PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> Following up on the previous thread about this topic, I'd like to
> propose the following release calendar for our next feature release.
Thanks for taking lead on this!
> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2 ass
Following up on the previous thread about this topic, I'd like to
propose the following release calendar for our next feature release.
First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2 assumptions
right now. First, that we should adopt semantic versioning for our
versioning scheme. Secon
20 matches
Mail list logo
