+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to invite the CloudStack community to
+1 (binding)
From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:16 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Change the project bylaws to modify the PMC Chair voting
process and add a term length
Hi all,
As pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Chan updated CLOUDSTACK-1469:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
> kvm agent: agent service fails to start
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Chan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1462:
-
Assignee: Anthony Xu (was: Rohit Yadav)
> Used Master Branch System
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Chan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1252:
-
Assignee: Kelven Yang
> Failed to download default template in VMw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Chan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1470:
-
Assignee: Min Chen
> unhandled exception executing api comm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Chan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1423:
-
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam
> Unable to launch UI [HTTP Status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Chan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1262:
-
Assignee: Chandan Purushothama
Chandan already tested this and it's not a vali
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Chan updated CLOUDSTACK-1262:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Failed to Prepare Secondary Storage in VMw
Rohit,
How much work is left to incoporate the system vm builder?
Will
From: Will Chan [will.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: What are the System VM Templates for ASF 4.1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:55 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: What are the System VM Templates for ASF 4.1 Release?
>
>
> The problem right now, is that IPv6 requires the ne
What does the 4.1 documentation say? I would follow that unless someone here
can claim that it has not been updated with the instructions of how to get the
system template for 4.1.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com]
> Sent: T
Wow...it also looks like we have the most # of contributors as well. Then
again, I didn't click past page 3.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:32 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Ohloh
>
Just to chime in here. At the moment, all development of features will be done
on Apache. There are no plans to develop anything internal and this applies to
future projects like Android/iOS apps. The UI team here at Citrix has this in
their plans of potential things to do for ACS but no deve
+1 (binding)
From: Alex Huang [alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 6:36 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Project Bylaws
+1 binding
There's a copy of your second draft here.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
I personally do not like flags changing syntax which is what it is in this
case. A flag to support whether a feature like "snapshots" is supported is ok.
A flag to say whether ID or UUID is accepted means issues with backwards
compatibility and also the fact that both ways needs to be tested a
-1
You will end up breaking anyone that has written any scripts/plugins/apps on
top of pre 3.x CS. Since UUID was introduced in 3.0, you should only accept
the following:
- All first class objects created before 3.0 should accept an normal internal
ID.
- All first class objects created after
Correct. In vsphere 5.1, this limitation was lifted to support up to 32 hosts.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 8:55 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Raise cluster size limit to 16 o
Actually, you are right, the API prevents someone from adding beyond 8.
However, I think you can work-around this by simply modifying the configuration
table directly.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19,
Has someone proven you can't change the global setting and not get past 8 host?
I could've sworn this was possible.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Mice Xia [mailto:weiran.x...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:47 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject:
Fantastic work and thanks to everyone in the community in getting this release
out.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:29 AM
> To: CloudStack Developers
> Subject: It's official!
>
> Just pushed out the 4.0.0-in
+1
I would love to make sure that we are strict on the time-based release. I know
that I would love to continue to add more and more features on each release and
I'm sure Citrix would love to incoporate features for their commercial releases
but if we are not strict with this, we will just kee
+1 (binding)
Followed instructions on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure
and was successfully able to verify the signatures, compile, and deployed on
VB. Was able to successfully launch a VM.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: chip.chi
other basic operations.
Regards
Mice
2012/9/18 Will Chan :
> Anyone actually try this out yet?
>
> Will
in issues.apache?
>
> Once 4.0 is out, can we expect Citrix to submit some of their work on
> CloudPlatform back into the Apache version?
>
> Roland Kool | Sr. Systems Engineer | TomTom TechOps |
>
>
>
> From: Will Chan [will.c
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 10:54 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE][ASFCS40] Drop OVM from the supported HV list for
> 4.0.0-incubating release?
>
> +1 We decided on a time-based
You might need to ask CPBM team for their support but I suspect it is most
likely support for CloudPlatform only.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Adnan Ashraf [mailto:mohammad.adnan.ash...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 10:07 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
+1.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:55 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE][ASFCS40] Drop OVM from the supported HV list for 4.0.0-
> incubating release?
>
> Hi all,
>
> Following
Apache Cloudstack is being developed and supported by the Apache CloudStack
community. Citrix CloudPlatform is a commercial derivative of CloudStack and
supported by Citrix. Citrix plans to contribute all features and bug fixes for
CloudPlatform as approved by the community back into Apache.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:04 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?
>
> I suspect I know the answer to that...so, do we want to consider adding
> (optional) code in the
It will take > week to get the existing OVM support to work again. The reason
being CloudPlatform doesn't have this working in our recent releases since
Acton. Adding support for the latest OVM will take even longer.
I would vote to have OVM be fixed in a later 4.0.x release.
Will
> -Ori
We definitely need to add these same issues in ASF Jira if it's still there.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:48 AM
> To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> S
Chip,
I assume the two outstanding issues are being looked at by someone?
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 1:21 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] Getting to the next
loudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> > I realize just blindly taking QA's test as a proxy is not actual doing
> anything but what if you are actually sitting down with a QA engineer, and
> executing the same
omment for the
QA.
Will
From: Noah Slater [nsla...@tumbolia.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:40 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Will Chan wr
Go ahead with the recast of votes then if you don't want QA to re-test. My
binding vote is based on Citrix QA test.
Will
From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:44 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4
+1 (binding)
From: Will Chan [will.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:28 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round
+1
First
+1
First!
From: chip.child...@sungard.com [chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf Of Chip
Childers (ASF) [chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:21 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incu
QA is going to verify both builds. When they are done, Sudha or myself will
send something to the dev list.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:41 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
&
Is this for OSS or non-OSS build? The reason I ask is because Citrix QA
verified that the OSS build was working last night.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apach
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:30 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] Status (Oct 9) of starting a 4.0.0 vote
>
>
> What's required to pull the feature out? Do we want to
>From this list, it looks like we have two blockers left.
1. Adding deb package for AWSAPI. Edison said he'll look into this and QA for
this should be pretty simple.
2. CLOUDSTACK-301. This is the Cisco Nexus vSwitch support that CloudPlatform
recently GAed in our 3.0.5 release (Burbank). It l
Thanks Edison.
Sudha, can we help out with a quick sanity test on this?
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:05 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ASF40][DISCUSS] Split AWS API / CloudBr
Anyone actually try this out yet?
Will
I don't think we just ever spent the time to upgrade the one used by console
proxy.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:30 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Notice file question - jquery
>
> I've spen
A very warm welcome to the community! I am certainly looking forward to
working with you all.
Sorry for this belated welcome but this week has been an extremely busy week
for me. After missing a week of not being able to really be on the dev list as
much as I want, I have about 500+ outstandi
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 8:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Jira lives!
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:40 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Ra
al Message-----
From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:31 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Fang Wang
Subject: RE: Review Request: Replace db-id by UUID for user VM's vm-id.
Fang,
We should remove instance-id as well because no user should have ac
Fang,
We should remove instance-id as well because no user should have access to the
CS generated name.
Will
From: Fang Wang [nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Fang Wang
[fang.w...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:49 PM
To: Kelven Ya
+1 for spaces
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 9:08 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tabs versus Spaces policy for sources code
>
> On 08/27/2012 05:40 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> > Hi,
+1 on documentation (also not volunteering as I barely known maven as well).
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:20 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: maven patch
>
> would be nice to document this in the wiki as well... (not volun
> -Original Message-
> From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 1:39 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Navigation concept
>
> Also, we do have pie-charts on the admin dashboard :)
>
Not enough!
I personally would like it if the navigation would just slide out. The 3d
stuff although is "cool", doesn't seem to add anything useful in terms of UX.
In fact, I would argue it makes it slightly less useful because the text become
blurry.
Also, I assume this required HTML5 and building somet
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:56 AM
> To:
> Subject: VOTE set up planet.cloudstack.org with ASF infrastructure
>
> Greetings. As part of our goal to bring up a blog aggregator for the
> CloudStack community, I
+1 to this addition. Fantastic work.
From: owen.n...@gmail.com [owen.n...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Nick Owen
[no...@wikidsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 8:13 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Cloudstack two-factor authenticatio
grees with
> point 2. What's the time frame for when this was supposed to be done?
>
> Darren
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: RE: Hibernate -> Custom DAO for AWS component
> From: Will Chan
> Date: Mon, August
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:35 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Breaking CloudStack into subprojects
>
> I think we're talking about two different things: First, t
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Liang [mailto:sheng.li...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 3:41 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Breaking CloudStack into subprojects
>
> > Let's take the Netscaler AutoScale feature currently being
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 3:13 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Breaking CloudStack into subprojects
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Alex Huang
> wrote:
> > After doing t
tack.org page and update status
> info appropriately on the ASF wiki version.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> > Pradeep, you might want to consider moving this wiki to the new apache
> wiki for CloudStack.
> >
> > https://cwi
Pradeep, you might want to consider moving this wiki to the new apache wiki for
CloudStack.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Index
> -Original Message-
> From: Pradeep Soundararajan [mailto:pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:28 AM
From: Alex Huang [alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:41 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema maintenance
> 2. What I'm not sure of is how to support the updates of these plugin tables.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
.apache.org
>
>
> +1 for this. I'd ditch the monolithic altogether.
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> > No argument from your thoughts on this. I think if the project wants the
> > incremental DB changes, CS is already in a good position
Dave,
>From a Citrix point of view, we will always need our own JIRA instance unless
>you just mean the bugs.cs.o URL is going away only. We will continue to carry
>on specific Citrix CloudPlatform releases that will invariably differ in
>version and codename. If we removed our JIRA instance
om my iPhone
On Aug 13, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Will Chan wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 5:36 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: sche
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 6:07 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: RE: [ASFCS40] Branching for 4.0?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 5:52 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bug tracker: Re: [DISCUSS] - A must do tasks for the coming 1-2
> months
>
> Also, can we plan on keeping the curr
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 5:36 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: schema maintenance
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Darren Shepherd
> wrote:
> > Has there been any talk abo
Ewan, I will help chase the Citrix proposed features (minus Netcaler team) to
add in upgrades scripts for their respective features. I assume you can take
care of the rest?
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, August
Hi John,
I'll take care of the old one. Thanks for copying this info over.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 3:49 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Release process
>
> E
I'm for this move to quickly start a brand new bug DB simply because there's
almost no workflow process for 4.0 or at least a way of tracking bugs that need
to be fixed for 4.0 release.
If Citrix ends up fixing bugs that are to be pushed into Apache, I will make a
policy in our end to at leas
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:dar...@godaddy.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 1:29 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hibernate -> Custom DAO for AWS component
>
>
> I think Alex and I agree on point 1, and I'm not sure if anybody agrees
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 10:33 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hibernate -> Custom DAO for AWS component
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:dar.
From: David Nalley [da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:40 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release Management Process
> As for upgrade, I didn't honestly think that was a question. We have
> thousands of CloudStack deploy
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+Release+Checklist
Ewan, thanks the release plan. A couple of questions since I wasn't sure if
the goal is to include them in the release:
1. I don't see the Netscaler AutoScaling feature merge into master. Has that
been d
> -Original Message-
> From: mpat...@inforelay.com [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 6:05 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Networking question
>
> > In basic mode, security groups are used for segregation but VMs are
> > only allowe
> From: Matthew Patton [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
> Pardon my ignorance but why on earth would you NOT use the vendor
> SDK/A
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:58 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> &g
I prefer the same option "remove VMware SDK from the build" idea as well. I
wouldn't even go as far as adding in other libraries. If people want to use
VMWare, I am hoping we can just give them additional instructions on how to do
that.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Mice Xia [mai
I also would like to know if everyone in the community does understand what is
being put into this branch because at some point, the developers of this
feature branch would probably ask the community to when they can merge back
into master. I would hope it wouldn't be a big surprise when this h
need to go via the patch
submission process. This should enable better productivity.
Will Chan
I'm not sure if we have this anywhere but the general support browsers should
be:
IE7, IE8, IE9, FF latest, Safari latest, Chrome latest
Will
From: Olga Smola [olya.sm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 9:17 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
ause limits cannot be imposed, as far as we're
> concerned, this type of user is pretty much useless because we have no way to
> control what it can do. Is this by design? And if so, why and is there a
> way it can
> be changed so that domain admins can have limits enforced?
You are correct that Cloudstack has created essentially three static roles
today. The most you can do today is to allow/disallow API commands to each
role via the commands.properties file.
It has been something that has been requested many times before, however, most
production systems that
ainer as I don't think I know any of the
modules well enough to take that roll yet, but it would be nice to see a few
more non-citrix people involved...
John
On Jun 12, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> I've taken all the feedback so far and extended the CloudStack Maintainers
I've taken all the feedback so far and extended the CloudStack Maintainers
Guide written by John and added all the maintainers so far. There are probably
more missing but that's what we have today. If we want this list to be its own
page, we can certainly do that as well but I thought it was e
The existing EULA and logo should be removed. This is just one of those TODO
we did not get to yet but we have already begun to setup processes to removing
that along with rest of the potential thirdparty incompatible libraries
CloudStack still be may using at this moment.
Will
-Original
It's still be a bit disconcerting that the JS scripts didn't automatically
refresh.
-Original Message-
From: Tamas Monos [mailto:tam...@veber.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:14 PM
To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; Sheng Yang; d...@soleks.com
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apa
+1
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 4:44 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: E-Mail client guidelines on the mailing list
>> - No top-quoting, only bottom quoting or in-line
I agree with most of these guide
I'll have one of the UI engineers review this. If it looks good, we'll add it
in.
Thanks.
Will
From: Ross Dakin [rossda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:50 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack UI - Language
Hi all,
A
en go into physical network
with that information?
If we can't do that, or it's just unnatural, I think we should change the label
of this field at a minimum.
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 10:49
I don't think we can use that as an
excuse for a fundamentally broken API. Can you agree that we have to
transition to cleartext exclusively?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 10:08 PM
> To: clo
It's only there to assist with the network configuration. We need to know the
first hypervisors you are going to add to a brand new zone. From there, we
tailor the rest of the wizard. Once the first zone has been created, you can
add additional hypervisors separately. If we did not do this,
vid Nalley [da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 9:35 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: user credntials
On Apr 30, 2012, at 9:11 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> The parameter for password is simply just used to pass information from the
> client to CS. It&#x
, either MD5 or plaintext (as in 3.0.x), or plaintext (as in some future
release when MD5 has been deprecated).The alternative is to just introduce
a new parameter (for cleartext password), and exactly one of that new param or
the existing param must be specified.
> -Original Message-
With this we do not need a new
>parameter too, probably a warning in the logs saying that this is
>going to be deprecated soon.
>
>-Abhi
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:kevin.kl...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 9:30 PM
>To: Will Chan
The service provider (or whomever is hosting CloudStack) needs to make that
decision. Using the default CS installation, we default to the
MD5UserAuthenticator which requires passwords passed to the login command to be
MD5 hashed. This got changed to plain-text in 3.0 and must be reverted back
It's not. It was accidentally changed to plain-text in 3.0 to support LDAP and
a community member found it changed from 2.2.x. We've reverted it now to pass
in MD5 hashed again. If you want to enable LDAP Auth, you would now need an
additional step to modify the UI to pass in a plain-text pas
We are in the middle of deciding what branches we will be moving to the Apache
git repo. Currently, the ones scheduled for the move are:
*
3.0.1
*
3.0.x
*
master
I know some of you are working off of branches off of the ones I listed.
If you like us to move those as well for easier mer
You should also add this to the wiki.
From: Kelven Yang [kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 5:58 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Development discussions for CloudStack
Subject: Security aspects of CloudStack console access
100 matches
Mail list logo
