gt; Hi Caleb,
>>
>> Do you have any instances running on the host? If not, then removing it
>> shouldn't cause any problems. Can you also check if xapi is running on
>> the host.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Devdeep
>>
>>> -Original Mes
ut mgmt_server_id for hosts in host table
> - start management server
>
>
> Anthony
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Caleb Call [mailto:cc...@overstock.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:48 PM
>> To:
>> Cc: Caleb Call; cloudstack-dev@in
Yes, I canceled maintenance mode via Cloudstack.
On Feb 11, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Ahmad Emneina
mailto:aemne...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
is the host still in maintenance mode, have you cancelled maintenance via
cloudstack?
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Caleb Call
mailto:calebc...@me.com&g
No luck, the mgmt_server_id is already null.
On Feb 11, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Caleb Call wrote:
> Yes to both of those, I should have mentioned I have tried to make sure
> connectivity is still good. I'll try nulling out the mgmt_server_id in the
> host table and see
management server, can you ssh to that host? can you execute xe
commands on that host? if yes to both those, null out the mgmt_server_id from
your host in the host table... then issue the force reconnect. see if that
helps.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Caleb Call
mailto:cc...@overstock.com&
We have a zone that has a single host in it. We also recently updated to 4.0
from 3.0.2 (this may not be relevant but figured I'd mention it anyways). We
put our host in maintenance mode (all VMs were shutdown, etc) and applied some
patches that were waiting to be applied. After coming back u
My cloudstack has gotten in to a terrible state. It seems that nothing is
reachable, all my hypervisors have been kicked out of the cloudstack pool (all
the hv's are in an alert state and won't reconnect) they try to reconnect, but
simply say (whatever resource) is unavailable. (storage, hv's,
has been restarted..
>
> Thanks
> ilya
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...@me.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 4:27 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: can i force expunge
>
> Make sure you also drop the ne
Make sure you also drop the network.gc.interval and network.gc.wait in addition
to expunge.delay and expunge.interval. Also, this may be obvious but you also
need to restart the ms for the new intervals to take affect.
Thanks
On Nov 12, 2012, at 2:11 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:
> Can I force
This is the exact same case for my upgrade as well. One thing I noticed in the
log file is it claims the -c option is not a valid option.
# cat sysvm.log
nohup: ignoring input
/usr/bin/cloud-sysvmadm: illegal option -- c
Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
Done restarting router(
>From a non-developer perspective, more releases shows a project is actively
>being worked-on/improved. We I'm looking at new projects to fill needs,
>that's definitely something I look at.
Thanks
On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> +1 semver
>
> +1 on 4 months as the timing. M
We spent a short while working on getting something similar going, but since we
had the resources to go another route we abandoned it fairly quickly. Instead,
we only needed basic zone functionality (internal corporate usage) so we have
setup Zones for each environment. (Management server on mg
The best way to get feature requests on the radar is to go to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK, create an account and then
submit a feature request through there.
I like the idea of this though.
Thanks
On Nov 2, 2012, at 12:25 PM, DE Clay wrote:
> I hope I'm sending this to t
+1 not to hold up the release (with hope that it's picked up in a future
release)
On Oct 19, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the OVM discussion thread [1], it appears that we
> don't have a full consensus yet. In order to move forward and make a
> decisi
On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:00:03PM -0700, Edison Su wrote:
>> Nobody complains OVM doesn't work in 4.0 before, means nobody use and
>> test it on 4.0 branch since half year ago when we starting to work on
>> 4.0 release.
>
> "Since half a yea
On Oct 17, 2012, at 12:40 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Frank Zhang wrote:
>> OVM is broken in 4.0 even these patches don't have license issue. It takes a
>> while to fix.
>> I vote to dropping it from 4.0
>
> Aside from the licensing issues - what are the issues t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13471909#comment-13471909
]
Caleb Call commented on CLOUDSTACK-105:
---
I happened across this ticket t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13471641#comment-13471641
]
Caleb Call commented on CLOUDSTACK-105:
---
Our servers are all in bridge
We are for our test hadoop environment. We aren't really doing anything
special though so not sure I'm really who they'd be interested in talking to.
If you want to pass along my info, that would be fine.
Thanks
On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A reporter fo
ks as the admin user. Is
this not the case? Should I file a bug about this (or maybe there's already
one for this?)
Thanks
On Sep 26, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Caleb Call wrote:
> No Windows. All instances are Linux (CentOS 5.8). Hypervisors are all
> Citrix Xenserver. I've added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13462882#comment-13462882
]
Caleb Call commented on CLOUDSTACK-105:
---
Our setup is using basic networ
That password that you have disabled is on the template, not for the VMs that
are created from it. Try password for the password.
On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> Thanks to David Nalley I got an access to an Apache CloudStack
> environment based on versi
Should the logs in /var/log/cloud/management/ be maintained? Is this something
we need to setup separately? I would think the app should maintain it's own
logs. I see them getting zipped up but we have all the logs back to when we
first installed our master node. Is this configurable somewhe
of files to keep (RollOverStrategy). See [1]
> for reference.
>
> [1]
> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders.html#RollingFileAppend
> er
>
> On 9/14/12 10:37 AM, "Caleb Call" wrote:
>
>> Should the logs in /var/log/cloud/management/ b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13455964#comment-13455964
]
Caleb Call commented on CLOUDSTACK-105:
---
Primary storage is on SAN (f
e: Xenserver 6.0.2/Cloudstack 3.0.2 stale socket files
>
> This looks like a prime candidate for a bug. There might be time to get it
> in before 4.0 goes out!
>
> On 9/14/12 9:54 AM, "Caleb Call" wrote:
>
>> We came across an interesting issue yesterday in
Caleb Call created CLOUDSTACK-105:
-
Summary: /tmp/stream-unix..## stale sockets causing inodes
to run out on Xenserver
Key: CLOUDSTACK-105
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105
We came across an interesting issue yesterday in one of our clusters. We ran
out of inodes on all of our cluster members (since when does this happen in
2012?). When this happened, it in turn made the / filesystem a read-only
filesystem which in turn made all the hosts go in to emergency maint
I sure hope HDFS is not required in the future as that's a complete waste when
you're already on redundant Enterprise level storage.
On Sep 9, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
> Hello Shanker,
>
> I mean that with CS, I want to replace NFS to HDFS. You know NFS is not a
> suitable solu
Caleb Call created CLOUDSTACK-25:
Summary: Allow Virtual Load Balancer with basic zone
Key: CLOUDSTACK-25
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-25
Project: CloudStack
Issue
I like that...a lot. Simple, clean, but still what appears to be fully
functional.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Below is a link to a possible UI concept in the works for CloudStack with an
> explanation of why certain things were down. Please take a look
I would second this. It would be great if you could add a repo to your server
and then run (RHEL) yum install cloudstack, or yum upgrade cloudstack.
On Aug 24, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on the documentation I'm figured it would be nice if we would
I was going to say, whatever is done with the UI should be ensured it also
works on tablets (HTML5 and CSS3 would be fine IMO). You can only do so much
to support older browsers…and IE is one that's majorly lacking. Even the
current UI has issues with IE. With that said, I use the current UI
There may be other issues I've missed in the discussions on separating them
but, instead of standing up two separate Jira instances, why not just use
separate projects within the current Jira project? Make the current CS project
read-only and/or locked down to only admins (or whoever is deemed
Ewan, or anyone else that may be more familiar with the project,
Has any progress been made on your last point of coming up with a roadmap for
the next few releases? I'm really curious when we'll see the first Apache
released Cloudstack. Also on that point, will the next released version be
3
35 matches
Mail list logo
