---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9902/#review17926
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alena Prokharchyk
On March 13, 2013, 3:04
Wanted to share the FS on the "Vlan Assignment to Isolated network" 4.2
feature with the community:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Vlan+assignment+to+I
solated+network
The use case for the feature: Administrator wants to assign the Vlan to an
Isolated network at the mome
+1
On 3/11/13 9:42 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether
>Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The
>result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to
>govern itself (which is a r
On 3/11/13 10:01 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:52 PM, George Reese
> wrote:
>> From listZones ->
>>
>> >cloud-stack-version="3.0.5.20120904142539">1f9a1
>>d2eb-c49e-4b87-ac9b-9c47e2d912a3australia-canberra-2>tworktype>Advancedfalse>upsenabled>Enabled257b387d-
>>3d9d-3585-8
Master branch doesn't compile after fetching the latest code. Please fix
whoever's commit caused it.
mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm
ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile
(default-compile) on project cloud-api: Compilation failure: Co
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9807/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Alena Prokharchyk
Go ahead and
>keep it.
>
>The point isn't to be a pain for folks, or specifically to use
>reviewboard. It's to confirm that 4.1 stays in a solid state, and that
>we are only moving important patches into that branch.
>
>Thanks!
>
>On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:45:1
gt; Commit:
>>http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/commit/45c51d
>>1f
>> Tree:
>>http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/tree/45c51d1f
>> Diff:
>>http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/diff/45c51d1f
>
I've noticed that on every cloudStack management server startup, the
public RSA key gets overridden (vi ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub). I'm running
cloudStack on OSX 10.8.2.
Not sure if it's a known issue, so raised a new bug against 4.2 (donno if
it exists in 4.1 branch).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows
I've fixed the build with commit 7a54458e172fa325d520970bd0dd84aece61f292.
The problem was caused by the new set of api commands added to the stack:
addIpToNic
removeIpFromNic
listNics
1) The commands were incorrectly represented in commands.properties file - had
trailing ";" - and APIDocReader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-573.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with 7857b1f62ab905790e4dd96f6b19d7d67255b56c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-572.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with 1aa4ad6a3c5c051ff6fcb68e0bf2bd58c9ddedcc
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-573:
Summary: NPE at
"com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.networkOfferingIsConfiguredForExternalNetworking(NetworkManagerImpl.java:4345)"
when create network from the network offering h
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-572:
Summary: SG Enabled Advanced Zone - Not able to deploy a VM in an
account specific shared network.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-572
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Hugo, congratulations!
-Alena.
On 11/26/12 11:49 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Hugo to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
>announce that he has accepted.
>
>Please join me in congratulating Hugo,
>
>--D
ifferent physical networks in one
>datacenter?
>
>If it is possible to share the same vlan on different physical networks
>of the datacenter, we could update the DB unique constraint to (`vnet`,
>`data_center_id`, 'physical_network_id') as Marcus suggests.
>
>But if vnet
Edison, could you confirm if this feature still works as you were the one
who added it?
commit 5e2f02fdd57258aa5efec5cdf680bdb3fbfce738
Author: Edison Su
Date: Thu Jan 26 18:45:31 2012 -0800
bug 13315: add httpproxy support in ssvm, only basic auth. User can
add secstorage.proxy = http://u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13498976#comment-13498976
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-493:
--
Intermediate che
On 11/16/12 3:03 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam"
wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:17:11AM +0530, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
>> In 2.2.x version of the cloudStack we provided support for Security
>>Groups
>> in Advance zone. The feature was temporary disabled in released
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-493:
Summary: 2.2.x-3.0 DB upgrade support for Advance SG enabled
networks
Key: CLOUDSTACK-493
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-493
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13498282#comment-13498282
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-226:
--
Prachi Damle added
Marcus,
Prachi would be the best person to answer this question as she added the
constraint to create-schema.sql:
8836a08e (prachi2011-11-08 11:23:37 -0800 658)
CONSTRAINT `fk_op_dc_vnet_alloc__physical_network_id` FOREIGN KEY
(`physical_network_id`) REFERENCES `physical_netw
;Does
>overlapping CIDR's of multiple isolated network will conflict with the
>security groups functionality at hypervisor level?
Not sure about that, Anthony would be the right person to answer this
question.
>
>Thanks,
>Murali
>
>On 14/11/12 12:17 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk&
In 2.2.x version of the cloudStack we provided support for Security Groups
in Advance zone. The feature was temporary disabled in released versions
of 3.0.x branch due to lack of dev and test resources needed to
accommodate the feature to the new NaaS framework.
Disabling the feature made an upgr
expunged VMs once a day and delete them from DB.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:23 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: can i force expunge
>
>Ilya,
>
&g
On 11/12/12 2:59 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:
>Can you have more than 1 Public VLAN per zone if you have multiple
>Physical Nics or is it a per zone restriction?
>
You can't define more than one Public traffic type per zone. And it means
you can't have multiple hypervisor labels for public traff
Ilya,
What hypervisor do you have? CleanupNetworkRules command is invoked by
SecurityGroupManager when clenaup SG for the expunged/crashed User vm. SG
is supported on Xen/KVM machines only. I suspect that in your case SG
mapping was created for the vm although your hypervisor doesn't support
it. C
the count info for a particular
>>account.
>>
>>
>>> On 11/6/12 5:42 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal"
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like the "countOnly" idea. If it were a proper REST API, it would
>>>> be GET /vm/c
e5-9b3022050a27",
>"netmask": "255.255.255.0",
>"gateway": "10.1.1.1",
> "ipaddress": "10.1.1.187",
>"isolationuri": &q
r
>>something for count only case to avoid issuing extra sql queries.
>>
>>-min
>>
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>
>>Date: Monday, November 5, 2012 3:43 PM
>>To:
>>"cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
ot
>that usefull.
Edison, it was fixed recently. Now "count" represents how many items in
the DB match your search criteria; not the number of the items you
requested with page/pagesize.
-Alena.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokh
Min,
We didn't use separate call as well as didn't use resource count table because
we "count" field represents the number of DB resources matching the search
criteria (ignoring page/pageSize info) specified in the list* api call. For
example:
listVirtualMachines&state=Running&hostId=1&page=1&
should remove call to createDefaultNetworks from
>persistDefaultValues().
>
>From your description, it sounds like removing this might cause issues for
>people who manually enter zone data. If you're sure this is not an issue,
>I'm happy to remove it and submit a pa
Dave,
This code - default network creation - is initiated only when the Global
config value "init" is false, as a part of persisting the default
cloudStack values. Init is false at the very first management server
startup, and it's reset to true after the default values are persisted.
Looks like
Congratulations, Alex!!!
On 10/30/12 6:41 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Alex to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
>announce that he has accepted.
>
>Please join me in congratulating Alex!
>
>Regards,
guest Vlan can be released if there are no user vms in the network.
Thank you,
Alena.
On 10/19/12 6:24 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>
>
>
>On 19/10/12 5:46 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
>wrote:
>
>>On 10/18/12 4:59 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>
On 10/18/12 4:59 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>On 17/10/12 10:42 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
>wrote:
>
>>Murali, some comments:
>>
>>1) "During network design phase of network creation, 'Direct network
>>Guru'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-279.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with 214bbf3ebd957f571901869f319da61ebad7ed23
Murali, some comments:
1) "During network design phase of network creation, 'Direct network
Guru' which designs the shared networks shall setup the network to be in
Network.State.Allocated if shared network is being created in advanced
zone and with L4-L7 services enabled"
Can you explain why? A
Murali, I've added some comments inline, please review.
On 10/17/12 8:56 AM, "Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Here is my list of comments/queries after reviewing the FS.
>
>(1) when the shared n/w scope is set to "domain/project", how is the
>external device allocation happen? Is it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-348.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with a9fab0526b466fffa398c522e876a558554e793e
ase code for more details.
>
>
>Thanks
>-min
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:08 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM
>
>
On 10/16/12 10:04 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Thanks Alena, So destroying an already stopped VM is just updating
>CloudStack DB without interacting with hypervisor, do we send hypervisor
>command when we expunge the
>destroyed VM?
Yes.
>
>Thanks
>-min
>
>On
gt; only check new request , stateless means rule check both request and
>> response.
>> 2. firewall rule is against public IP, ACL is against guest network, it
>>doesn't
>> care which public IP it goes through
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>&
Forgot to mention: if Destroy command is called on vm in Running state,
cloudStack:
* Stops vm on the backend (just the way we do when StopVm command is
executed, so you no longer see the vm on the hypervisor)
* marks vm as Destroyed in the DB.
On 10/16/12 9:53 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk&qu
On 10/16/12 9:46 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Thanks Lee for clarification. Then my next natural question is: what is
>the difference between stop instance and destroy instance (which are also
>shown on CloudStack UI)?
cloudStack doesn't send any commands to the backend on DestroyVm command.
The vm i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476640#comment-13476640
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-348:
--
Dave, the bug exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk updated CLOUDSTACK-348:
-
Affects Version/s: 4.0.0
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
> deleteNetw
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-355:
Summary: Fix "count" in a bunch of API commands
Key: CLOUDSTACK-355
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-332.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> "count" property in list* API respo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476634#comment-13476634
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-332:
--
For qa - all comm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476630#comment-13476630
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-332:
--
co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476629#comment-13476629
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-332:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-347.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with 1d458c7a2d0db3ad80721a4dfcbca4c6e991065d
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-347:
Summary: listNetworks API: return vlan information only when the
caller is ROOT admin
Key: CLOUDSTACK-347
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
ight not be the best idea here ?
Yes, you can file an enhancement for this.
>
>Thanks,
>-Nitin
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 9:24 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthon
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com>>
To: Alena Prokharchyk
mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>,
"cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>"
mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>>
Subj
:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: FS on cloudStack createSnapshot synchronization improvement
I only have one comment:
Can we put this snapshot improvement code out of snapshotmanager?
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
Se
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-332:
Summary: "count" property in list* API response should be equal to
how many entries in database, not how many objects in API response
Key: CLOUDSTACK-332
nd to the StaticNatCommand in the
SRXManager (if the public IP address is Static nat enabled), so it behaves
2.2.x way on the backend. And ignore createFirewallRule command by SRX if
the public ip address is not static nat enabled.
-Alena.
On 10/12/12 9:48 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
>
Jayapal, please see my comments inline.
-Alena.
On 10/11/12 11:07 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
wrote:
>Alena,
>
>Please find my inline comments.
>
>Thanks,
>Jayapal
>
>Thanks,
>Jayapal
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent:
t;
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:51 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: FS on cloudStack createSnapshot synchronization improvement
>>
>
Jayapal, I reviewed the spec. My comments:
If firewall rules per public IP address can't be configured on the SRX,
and there is no way to fix it (your spec says so in "Limitation" section),
why do we introduce all this complexity? To me it seems like we are trying
to show the user that he is contr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk updated CLOUDSTACK-322:
-
Assignee: Prachi Damle
> During upgrade displays error - a foreign
Edison, congrats!!!
On 10/11/12 7:27 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Edison to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
>announce that he has accepted.
>
>Please join me in congratulating Edison!
>
>Regards,
>C
+1
Thanks everyone for great work!
-Alena.
On 10/10/12 9:34 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote:
>+1
>
>--Sheng
>
>On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Mice Xia
>wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> -Mice
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-95.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with 823f0c96692cc0d3fe7ffae0beb2ebe15eb37e2c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-304.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with 339aa414426880cef98938bcae1a9827df8bee78
arameters you need, all the backend logic is in place. Plus in
the future we are planning to enhance the functionality by adding
ALLOW/DENY permissions and Priority to the network ACLs.
>
>Thanks,
>Jayapal
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokha
Hi All,
I'm planning to introduce some changes to create snapshot behavior for the
future cloudStack release (the changes will go to asf/master branch). The
fix is fixing the problem described below:
"With the current code for snapshots, cloudStack always creates snapshot
on the host where vm i
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-304:
Summary: Add synchronization for createSnapshot command per host
basis
Key: CLOUDSTACK-304
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-304
On 10/9/12 8:10 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> wrote:
>> The egress firewall rules feature will configure the egress rules for
>>guest network on VR/External firewall to ALLOW
>>
>> specified traffic to outside and BLOCK the remaining traffic.
>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk updated CLOUDSTACK-279:
-
Summary: deleteProject fails when executed by the regular user (works fine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk updated CLOUDSTACK-279:
-
Just did more code analysis. The problem is the following:
1) deleteProject
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk updated CLOUDSTACK-279:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.0.0
Assignee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-287.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with cfd2091337534f0ff7edcacd404c776fa202c5c7 and
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-287:
Summary: Security bug: System user doesn't have any password
Key: CLOUDSTACK-287
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-287
Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13471075#comment-13471075
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-84:
-
See my comments to
s is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7168/
> ---
>
> (Updated Sept. 19, 2012, 3:38 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Kishan Kavala, Nitin
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13470720#comment-13470720
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-271:
--
The NPE problem is f
Hi Hugo,
Sorry, wasn't aware of Nicira case when put the fix. Both UI and API has
to be fixed - don't accept vnet parameter in both create/update
physicalNetwork when isolation type is not VLAN. The check should be done
on the services layer before checkGuestVnetsConflicts() method is even
called.
in 4.0
branch - the fix was done on API layer. Whenever api builds a response for some
object returned by the server and the object belongs to project, we should
query project information including the project that has been removed.
- Alena Prokharchyk
On Sept. 19, 2012, 3:38 p.m., Rohit Yadav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-84.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with e1dc0024ea5d869dd9945b920ba85dd2a24a51c1
> On Oct. 5, 2012, 6:36 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> > Ship It!
Fixed with f7ebb76f57a0c88c8b379aacb1a4e3fd653a325f. Added WARN statement
myself.
- Alena
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vis
> On Sept. 14, 2012, 11:43 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> > 1)long dcId = dest.getDataCenter().getId();
> > List pods =
> > _podDao.listByDataCenterIdVMTypeAndState(dcId, VirtualMachine.Type.User,
> > V
--
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7130/
> ---
>
> (Updated Sept. 27, 2012, 4:34 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinan
3:38 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Kishan Kavala, Nitin
> Mehta, Alena Prokharchyk, and Alex Huang.
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> Domain ACL information should be valid even if account entry is marked
> removed. Patch fixes how ac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13470534#comment-13470534
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-121:
--
Fixed in 4.0 branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7130/#review12195
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alena Prokharchyk
On Sept. 27, 2012, 4:34
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13470451#comment-13470451
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-240:
--
The tag wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13470445#comment-13470445
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-95:
-
I know what the proble
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13469819#comment-13469819
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-252:
--
It's a bug i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk updated CLOUDSTACK-95:
Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0)
4.1.0
> IP addr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk reassigned CLOUDSTACK-91:
---
Assignee: Nitin Mehta (was: Saksham Srivastava)
> no error mess
Alena Prokharchyk created CLOUDSTACK-234:
Summary: create/delete firewa/lb/pf rule: send ip assoc command
just for the IP for which you are creating the rule
Key: CLOUDSTACK-234
URL: https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-226.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with 11fe086adab8e790018343252ed08aac9a27b1c6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk updated CLOUDSTACK-108:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0)
4.1.0
Punting to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13464108#comment-13464108
]
Alena Prokharchyk commented on CLOUDSTACK-91:
-
It's ok to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk reassigned CLOUDSTACK-198:
Assignee: Kishan Kavala (was: Alena Prokharchyk)
Kishan, it
account can't be
found? At the moment we just return NULL.
- Alena Prokharchyk
On Sept. 25, 2012, 7:56 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
