[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-971) The error dialog is empty

2013-01-13 Thread Isaac Chiang (JIRA)
Isaac Chiang created CLOUDSTACK-971: --- Summary: The error dialog is empty Key: CLOUDSTACK-971 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-971 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug

RE: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support

2013-01-13 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Side note, but where are we going to do development? I think we should get our work in a feature branch as soon as possible so we can all contribute to the development. Sheng, can you push any work you have done to a branch? I'll check and see if I need to commit any of my changes then. Cheers

Re: Re: signature

2013-01-13 Thread hj19870610
thank you very much! hj19870610 From: Gavin Lee Date: 2013-01-14 13:24 To: cloudstack-dev Subject: Re: signature Hi, CloudStack itself also has the tool for signature generating based on command and secretkey. You can get reference from: test/src/com/cloud/test/utils/UtilsForTest.java There is

Re: signature

2013-01-13 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:24:40AM -0500, Gavin Lee wrote: > Hi, > CloudStack itself also has the tool for signature generating based on > command and secretkey. > You can get reference from: test/src/com/cloud/test/utils/UtilsForTest.java > There is a guide for CloudStack API (Chinese only): > htt

Re: signature

2013-01-13 Thread Gavin Lee
Hi, CloudStack itself also has the tool for signature generating based on command and secretkey. You can get reference from: test/src/com/cloud/test/utils/UtilsForTest.java There is a guide for CloudStack API (Chinese only): http://www.cloudstack-china.org/2012/12/1465.html On Mon, Jan 14, 2013

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Great, thanks for the info, Marcus. I'm new to both CloudStack and SolidFire, so I'm trying to get my head wrapped around the work I will need to do. On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > More to your example, there is no cloudstack controlled iops or performance > setting c

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Marcus Sorensen
More to your example, there is no cloudstack controlled iops or performance setting concerning storage (yet), but what an admin could possibly do is define a primary storage that is 'regular performance', tag it something, like 'lowperf', then define a primary storage that is high performance, tag

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Awesome...thanks for the reply, Marcus. On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > From your description it sounds like you're asking if a VM can have > multiple disks. It can, the current model is 1 root disk (created from the > template you choose) and then N number of data disk

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Marcus Sorensen
>From your description it sounds like you're asking if a VM can have multiple disks. It can, the current model is 1 root disk (created from the template you choose) and then N number of data disks (is there a limit?). So you could create a new volume, attach it to an existing VM, and that VM would

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Another thing I was curious about (and perhaps someone on this list can answer) is if, say, Xen is running one VM from one virtual volume (equal to a LUN, in this scenario), can an app running in this VM access a data volume from a different virtual volume? So, the VM is running off of one virtual

Enabling Virtio for Windows guests on KVM

2013-01-13 Thread Chris Sears
Greetings, A question came up a couple days ago on the users list about provisioning Windows VMs with Virtio enabled on KVM: http://markmail.org/thread/g42vr63dolaa56yv The workaround mentioned was to set the OS Type to "Other PV". This seems non-optimal. Is there a better solution? Or is this a

Re: signature

2013-01-13 Thread Isaac Chiang
Hi: Please refer to the document : CloudStack Developer's Guide and take a look to chapter 4. Regards Isaac On M

signature

2013-01-13 Thread hj19870610
hello: Cloud you tell me hou can I create a signature using API Key and Secret Key ?Thank you very much! hj19870610

Re: master build failed

2013-01-13 Thread Siyuan Tian
Hi David, Yes, that's what I am looking for. Cheers, Siyuan On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Siyuan Tian wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > It looks great! Thanks a lot. > > > > On http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/, it says that last

Re: master build failed

2013-01-13 Thread David Nalley
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Siyuan Tian wrote: > Hi Chris, > > It looks great! Thanks a lot. > > On http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/, it says that last successful > and failed builds were more than 3 months ago, but last integration was 8 > minutes ago. > > It seems the building pro

Re: master build failed

2013-01-13 Thread Siyuan Tian
Hi Chris, It looks great! Thanks a lot. On http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/, it says that last successful and failed builds were more than 3 months ago, but last integration was 8 minutes ago. It seems the building process is not triggered by commiting into repository but buy a timer,

Re: master build failed

2013-01-13 Thread Chris Sears
Hi Siyuan, The main Jenkins instance is here: http://jenkins.cloudstack.org The standard jobs involve building in RHEL 6.3 and Ubuntu 12.04 environments. - Chris On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Siyuan Tian wrote: > What is the "standard" building environment? > > Any continuous integration

Re: deb package name and the split in subpackages

2013-01-13 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, On 01/11/2013 04:05 PM, Noa Resare wrote: (This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending it to the list to get a bit more transparency) Great! :) Looking at the packaging branch(1) I think the work to reduce the number of subpackages is a very good initiative.

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Jan 13, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 01/13/2013 06:47 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> >>> On the KVM side, you can do NFS, Local disk storage, CLVM (shared block >>> device that has Clustered LVM on top of

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 01/13/2013 06:47 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: On the KVM side, you can do NFS, Local disk storage, CLVM (shared block device that has Clustered LVM on top of it, a primary pool is a particular volume group and cloudstack carves out log

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I'm not super familiar with all of the xen setup, but anything xen supports as an SR should be usable in presetup mode. On Jan 13, 2013 10:48 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > > On the KVM side, you can do NFS, Local disk storage, CLVM (

Re: CloudStack Storage Question

2013-01-13 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > On the KVM side, you can do NFS, Local disk storage, CLVM (shared block > device that has Clustered LVM on top of it, a primary pool is a particular > volume group and cloudstack carves out logical volumes out of it as > needed), and RBD (RAD

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread bharat kumar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review15304 --- Ship it! Ship It! - bharat kumar On Jan. 13, 2013, 5:14 p.m., bha

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread bharat kumar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review15303 --- Ship it! Ship It! - bharat kumar On Jan. 13, 2013, 5:14 p.m., bha

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread bharat kumar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/ --- (Updated Jan. 13, 2013, 5:14 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread bharat kumar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/ --- (Updated Jan. 13, 2013, 5:14 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-970) when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-970: --- Summary: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table. Key: CLOUDSTACK-970 URL: https://issues.apache.o

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread David Nalley
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review15302 --- It doesn't appear that this was committed. Additionally, your descri

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-966) Improve error reporting when running on unknown OS / version

2013-01-13 Thread Noa Resare (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Noa Resare closed CLOUDSTACK-966. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Noa Resare I have verified this to be fixed in master as of

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-966) Improve error reporting when running on unknown OS / version

2013-01-13 Thread Prasanna Santhanam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552155#comment-13552155 ] Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-966: --- commit 127867cc999a7c77

Re: Review Request: Improved handling of unknown OS, Distribution

2013-01-13 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8937/#review15300 --- Ship it! LGTM - Prasanna Santhanam On Jan. 12, 2013, 7:16 p.m., N

Re: devcloud-kvm (and marvin bugs)

2013-01-13 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
I've fixed the problem of the same vlan applied to all the physical networks with CLOUDSTACK-968 [1]. The vlan attribute went back-and-forth b/w zone and phy. network when the physical-network concept was introduced. Looks like I failed to fix marvin then. Also while fixing this I noticed our Zone

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-969) api: zone response lists vlan in it as "vlan range of zone" but the vlan belongs to physical network

2013-01-13 Thread Prasanna Santhanam (JIRA)
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-969: - Summary: api: zone response lists vlan in it as "vlan range of zone" but the vlan belongs to physical network Key: CLOUDSTACK-969 URL: https://issues.apache.org/

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-968) marvin: vlan should be an attribute of the physical_network and not the zone

2013-01-13 Thread Prasanna Santhanam (JIRA)
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-968: - Summary: marvin: vlan should be an attribute of the physical_network and not the zone Key: CLOUDSTACK-968 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9