Re: making VM startup more fine-grained

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> I have looked at the code more in detail and found a bit tricky thing. >> >> Inside the createVif() method, it calls getNetwork(conn, nic) to set >> vifr.network record. And inside getNetwork(), it differentiates by >> BroadcastDomainType. >> >>

RE: making VM startup more fine-grained

> I have looked at the code more in detail and found a bit tricky thing. > > Inside the createVif() method, it calls getNetwork(conn, nic) to set > vifr.network record. And inside getNetwork(), it differentiates by > BroadcastDomainType. > > Now I'm wondering if the method getNetwork() to be insi

Re: making VM startup more fine-grained

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Tomoe Sugihara wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> >> >> On 7/25/12 10:52 PM, "Ishimoto, Ryu" wrote: >> >>>On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >>>chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> Also note that in

Review Request: Fix unittest CheckPointManagerTest and SecurityGroupManagerImpl2Test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6426/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Ewan Mellor. Description --- changes: -ad

RE: Regarding Runbook and L10N

David, Translation done for zh-CN, verified with publican. Please help commit po files. Regards Mice -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 11:26 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Regarding Runbook and L10N On Su

Review Request: ec2-run-instances fails with error "Unable to find service offering by id". Component: AWSAPI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6425/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- Added a che

Re: Review Request: EC2 tag support, improve error handling. Component: AWSAPI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6424/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2012, 5:08 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle

Review Request: EC2 tag support, improve error handling. Component: AWSAPI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6424/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- Handle exce

Re: Review Request: Increase column size of CloudstackOffering in cloudbridge db setup to allow for long uids

> On Aug. 7, 2012, 4:49 a.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > The change look good. Since the schema is changing the update path also > > need to be handled. > > David Nalley wrote: > Why is that? No previous CloudStack release has had cloudbridge > integrated into it, so this wouldn't exist to be

Re: Review Request: Increase column size of CloudstackOffering in cloudbridge db setup to allow for long uids

> On Aug. 7, 2012, 4:49 a.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > The change look good. Since the schema is changing the update path also > > need to be handled. Why is that? No previous CloudStack release has had cloudbridge integrated into it, so this wouldn't exist to be upgrade. - David --

Re: Review Request: Increase column size of CloudstackOffering in cloudbridge db setup to allow for long uids

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6395/#review9942 --- The change look good. Since the schema is changing the update path als

Re: CloudStack Events Plans

Community@ is a legacy email from the beginning of CloudStack that we sent all sorts of stuff to including Twitter sign-ups, complaints, spam reports from the forums, etc. It's just and alias that goes to David Nalley, Joe Brockmeier and myself and prompts us to do real work ;) I think we should k

RE: Proposal to grant committer status to Mice Xia

> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:20:38AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: > > > I would like to propose that we grant CloudStack committer status to > > > Mice Xia. Mice is regularly submitting work of high quality, and > > would > > > be an asset to the team. > > OK, in that case I propose Mice for discus

Re: CloudStack Events Plans

I noticed that there's an e-mail address(commun...@cloudstack.org)displayed on the Community Event Planning page (http://clds.co/PD0raZ). Will this be the official channel for discussing these sorts of things going forward (i.e., is commun...@cloudstack.org a managed mailing list)? Eric Pretor

Re: CloudStack Events Plans

Hey, Mark: I'm not much of a spokesperson at the moment - My time's been consumed with issues much lower in the stack - but I'd be interested in helping out. e.g., sweeping the floors, taking out the trash, etc ;) Eric Pretorious Truckee, CA > > From: Mark Hi

Re: CloudStack PPMC Member List

Thanks David. I was asking, specifically so that I could point to something in the draft release proces docs I've started working on. As I understand it, the PPMC is the first "official voting group" during the release approval process. I wanted to be sure that we all knew who's votes would be b

Re: Release Management Process

Hey Chip, happy to help you out. Will go ahead and add my key to the KEYS file this evening. John On Aug 6, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > This may be presumptuous (both for myself and for the project's > readiness to release), but I'd like to volunteer to help in executing > the act

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

> - Original Message - > > From: "Kevin Kluge" > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 12:38:15 PM > Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements > > > Can we conclude this with: > > > > Supported platforms for CloudStack 4.0 KVM HyperVisor

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Simon Weller [mailto:swel...@ena.com] >> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 10:45 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements >> >> >> - Origina

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

> > -Original Message- > From: Simon Weller [mailto:swel...@ena.com] > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 10:45 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kevin Kluge" > To: cloudstack-dev@incu

Re: [Discuss] VM Snapshot

When VM is running, snapshot operations have to be co-ordinated, once you have the snapshots in storage, it is possible to branch off other branches forking a VM and taking other snapshots on top of it. However, you can not have more than one parent. The eventual big picture of it is a tree instea

RE: [Discuss] VM Snapshot

Is it possible to have multiple parent snapshots for a VM/Volume? That would be a way to get around the issue of bumping heads with other snapshot processes. Sent from my mobile phone, please forgive any minor spelling or grammar mistakes. -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [alex.hu...

RE: Unit test failures

Thanks Mice, that's very helpful. Please put that code up for review if you haven't already. I'll chase someone about ResourceManagerTest and see if there's someone with background knowledge for that one. There's one more: NetUtilsTest.testGetRandomIpFromCidr. This is intermittent -- it's fa

RE: Proposal to grant committer status to Mice Xia

> -Original Message- > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 5:42 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposal to grant committer status to Mice Xia > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:20:38AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: > > I would

Re: CloudStack PPMC Member List

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > All, > > Is there a published CloudStack PPMC member list somewhere? > > -chip No there isn't (or at least not that I am aware of) I'll add a section on the status page for this. The current list is: Kevin Kluge Will Chan David Nalley the

Re: Release Management Process

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > This may be presumptuous (both for myself and for the project's > readiness to release), but I'd like to volunteer to help in executing > the actual release process. > > I've been reading through the ASF release management process > documentat

Re: [Discuss] VM Snapshot

+1 We've been discussing this many times before. VM snapshot with VSS support is very important for many enterprise applications. However, there is a reason and a challenge to fill the gap of what we used to call VM centric model vs Amazon Volume centric model in previous CloudStack. We will need

Re: re-implement clvm

Ok, I'll send on the core java patch portion. I've reviewed the managesnapshot.sh changes. I had someone begin to create a clean room version implementing the same functionality, and in the process found that we can really only change it superficially as well. The clean room version changed the bul

CloudStack PPMC Member List

All, Is there a published CloudStack PPMC member list somewhere? -chip

Release Management Process

This may be presumptuous (both for myself and for the project's readiness to release), but I'd like to volunteer to help in executing the actual release process. I've been reading through the ASF release management process documentation [1] [2]. We have a good bit of admin-istrivia to cover off a

RE: Review Request: Cherry-picked bugfix from 3.0.x fixes templated checksum issue in master

> -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of > Rohit Yadav > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 11:20 AM > To: Edison Su; Nitin Mehta > Cc: cloudstack; Rohit Yadav > Subject: Re: Review Request: Cherry-picked bugfix from 3.0.x fixes > templated chec

Re: Review Request: Cherry-picked bugfix from 3.0.x fixes templated checksum issue in master

> On Aug. 6, 2012, 5:46 p.m., edison su wrote: > > When developers checking bugfixes in 3.0.x or other branch, they should > > push the fixes into apache master also. But there are some fixes not > > following this pattern(like the patch you send), we need to manually > > cherry-pick them int

RE: [Discuss] VM Snapshot

+1. Some of the concepts in CloudStack follows too closely to what Amazon EC2 APIs do. Snapshots (really backup as you pointed out) is one such problem. In CloudStack storage, we should clearly distinguish between -Primary Storage Volume Access -Snapshots (VM based) -Backup (Moving snapshot

RE: IPtables deb in source repo

Maybe we can switch to Ubuntu 12.04?: VMware supports it: http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/Ubuntu_12_04.html Xen/KVM supports it by default. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 11:51 AM > To: > Subject: Re: IPta

Re: Review Request: Cherry-picked bugfix from 3.0.x fixes templated checksum issue in master

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6392/#review9889 --- Ship it! When developers checking bugfixes in 3.0.x or other branch,

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

- Original Message - From: "Kevin Kluge" To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 12:38:15 PM Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements > Can we conclude this with: > > Supported platforms for CloudStack 4.0 KVM HyperVisors: > - Ubuntu 12.04

RE: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

> Can we conclude this with: > > Supported platforms for CloudStack 4.0 KVM HyperVisors: > - Ubuntu 12.04 > - CentOS 6.2 > - CentOS 6.3 > - RHEL 6.2 > - RHEL 6.3 Seems fine to me. > > If people want to run on a different platform, we require: > - libvirt 0.9.4 > > That is actually it, most of

RE: cloudbridge from master

Query API is not tested in the current integrated version of awsapi. I think there are issues with the REST authentication. SOAP API has been fully integrated and test and it works with the EC2 command line tools. > > However the service offering registration does not produce anything > > and t

Re: proper SSL/ssh management

Hardening guide's a good idea as well. I don't see a general road map in the wiki? I'm going to start working on a security roadmap ("wish list" is probably more accurate for now, not going to put dates/releases on it) but that can either be merged into or linked from a "general" road map when

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

On 08/06/2012 12:59 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 08/06/2012 03:47 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote: On 08/06/2012 09:32 AM, David Nalley wrote: On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 08/02/2012 10:50 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: So I think it's important to realize that

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

On 08/06/2012 03:47 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote: On 08/06/2012 09:32 AM, David Nalley wrote: On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 08/02/2012 10:50 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: So I think it's important to realize that the actual release is a source release. That makes

Re: Patch for object storage backend

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Jamshid Afshar wrote: > Hi, I am Jamshid Afshar and I work for Caringo. We would like to > submit a patch to CloudStack to allow our storage product, CAStor, to > be used as the backend for the S3 API instead of > S3FileSystemBucketAdapter. > > It will require the

Patch for object storage backend

Hi, I am Jamshid Afshar and I work for Caringo. We would like to submit a patch to CloudStack to allow our storage product, CAStor, to be used as the backend for the S3 API instead of S3FileSystemBucketAdapter. It will require the addition of a couple of .jar's in deps/awsapi-lib/ and new classes

Re: where features are developed was: Review Request: Merge Kelven's VPC code for Vmware into asf vpc branch

Ewan / Brett, I've been watching this thread closely, but holding off on commenting until I was able to get some thoughts straightened out in my own head over the weekend. This is a critical discussion for the community, since there are going to be an increasing number of organization-sponsored d

Re: Regarding Runbook and L10N

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Mice Xia wrote: > Hi David, > > I have submitted a patch in review board, and fixed typos of Chinese > translations on transifex. > Would you please review the patch and update pot file on transifex.com first? > One or two message keys are outdated there, and I w

Re: Review Request: Several minor updates for configuration section in runbook

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6390/#review9887 --- Ship it! Thanks for the patch - I just pushed this (will update the p

Review Request: Increase column size of CloudstackOffering in cloudbridge db setup to allow for long uids

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6395/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- Increase column size of Clou

License header daily update - Monday Aug 6

As I said on Friday, I'll send this out each morning (US Eastern time) to share the current status of license header compliance on the master branch. Specific questions below for: Prachi, Joe, Wean, David, Alex, Chiradeep Updated RAT report: https://github.com/chipchilders/asf_cloudstack_RAT_res

RE: Official ASF process for re-writing code?

Hey Chip, Just pushed the commit that removes the XTrustProvider (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=dd6fd2b68df95feb4f7f7f9bbbed1086997dc765) I tested this against our F5 and the CloudStack code will still happily connect using SSL with the changed co

Re: What to do with Autoscale: was: Re: [6/11] AutoScale changes in Apache master

Vijay: There are still a number of issues (not necessarily around this particular feature but around the process itself) still being discussed. Brett (one of our mentors) is taking the lead on them, so I'll let him provide us with some guidance. Brett: I don't necessarily want to block forward p

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

On 08/06/2012 09:32 AM, David Nalley wrote: On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 08/02/2012 10:50 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: So I think it's important to realize that the actual release is a source release. That makes the question (at least in my mind) what platforms w

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 08/02/2012 10:50 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: >>> >>> So I think it's important to realize that the actual release is a source release. That makes the question (at least in my mind) what platforms will we build convenience

Re: cloudbridge from master

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:46:39AM -0400, sebgoa wrote: > Hi Likitha, > > I am referring to the deployment of cloudbridge within the CS > management server. I believe that's how it's supposed to be now, as > opposed to a separate installation like in the current binary > release. > > Specifically

Re: Official ASF process for re-writing code?

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya , > > I've been looking into this. The XTrustProvider class is also part of the > cloud-iControl.jar. Where do we get the jar from? > > So far I've not yet been able to get the library to throw certificate > validation errors even when

Re: cloudbridge from master

Hi Likitha, I am referring to the deployment of cloudbridge within the CS management server. I believe that's how it's supposed to be now, as opposed to a separate installation like in the current binary release. Specifically, if you checkout the current master from git, and build-all, I under

Re: Proposal to grant committer status to Mice Xia

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:20:38AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: > I would like to propose that we grant CloudStack committer status to > Mice Xia. Mice is regularly submitting work of high quality, and would > be an asset to the team. I too have noticed that Mice has made some quality contribution

Review Request: Cherry-picked bugfix from 3.0.x fixes templated checksum issue in master

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6392/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta and edison su. Description --- C

RE: cloudbridge from master

Hi Sebastien, Are you referring to the deployment of cloudbridge as a separate setup ? Because I have been able to successfully run the ec2 commands against CloudStack(integrated codebase) using the ec2-api tools. Thank you, Likitha -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.

Re: [Discuss] VM Snapshot

On 08/06/2012 12:20 PM, Tamas Monos wrote: This would be a very welcomed feature in CloudStack. As mentioned earlier customers always want huge volumes for their data and vmware struggles to export them, it takes very long to time IF the export succeeds but many times I get 'Error while takin

RE: [Discuss] VM Snapshot

This would be a very welcomed feature in CloudStack. As mentioned earlier customers always want huge volumes for their data and vmware struggles to export them, it takes very long to time IF the export succeeds but many times I get 'Error while taking snapshot' with exceptions all around. End us

Re: CloudStack Events Plans

Shall we create a cloudstack-events mailing list to discuss all of these ? On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > Hmm, I think I need to upgrade my shirt to a monkey shirt :) > > Glad to hear OSCON went well, I was not able to make it. > > Kelcey Jamison-Damage > Infrastruc

Re: Review Request: Introduce Vif Driver in KVM

> On Aug. 6, 2012, 9:34 a.m., Wido den Hollander wrote: > > plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/BridgeVifDriver.java, > > line 124 > > > > > > The general rule on Linux is still to limit inter

cloudbridge from master

Hi all, I am wondering if anyone has had success deploying and *using* cloudbridge from the master branch.. I did a ant build-all and a ant rdeploy to devcloud, the database gets created, I can register the user and cert as documented in http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/310

Re: Review Request: Introduce Vif Driver in KVM

> On Aug. 6, 2012, 9:34 a.m., Wido den Hollander wrote: > > plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/BridgeVifDriver.java, > > line 124 > > > > > > The general rule on Linux is still to limit inter

Re: CloudStack 4.0 KVM system requirements

On 08/02/2012 10:50 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: So I think it's important to realize that the actual release is a source release. That makes the question (at least in my mind) what platforms will we build convenience binaries for, as I suspect anyone who builds from source doesn't really care abou

Re: Review Request: Introduce Vif Driver in KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6285/#review9882 --- plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/BridgeV

RE: What to do with Autoscale: was: Re: [6/11] AutoScale changes in Apache master

David/Ewan, Do you see any other thing to be done before we submit patches in autoscale branch. Thanks, Vijay V. > -Original Message- > From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 4:44 PM > To: Ewan Mellor; cloudstack-dev@incu

Re: making VM startup more fine-grained

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > > On 7/25/12 10:52 PM, "Ishimoto, Ryu" wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >>chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Also note that in order to support hotplug and hot-detach of nics, we >>>need >>> com

RE: Official ASF process for re-writing code?

Heya , I've been looking into this. The XTrustProvider class is also part of the cloud-iControl.jar. Where do we get the jar from? So far I've not yet been able to get the library to throw certificate validation errors even when disabling the line in configure with the XTrustProvider. Digging

RE: Unit test failures

By adding some Daos/Managers to component locators, I can pass SecurityGroupManagerImpl2Test and CheckPointManagerTest But ResourceManagerTest is tough. It sets almost everything up without using Mock objects, which means a lot of managers/Daos and their cascading dependency need to be added in

Re: Proposal to grant committer status to Mice Xia

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:20:38AM -0400, Ewan Mellor wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose that we grant CloudStack committer status to > Mice Xia. Mice is regularly submitting work of high quality, and > would be an asset to the team. > > Mice, that's assuming that it's OK with you! >