---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5927/#review9131
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On July 13, 2012, 6:46 a.m., Prasa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5927/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Prachi Damle and Nitin Mehta.
Description
---
Nice idea to have atomic increment in ResourceLimitManager class. Having it in
ResourceLimitManager will solve the resource limit problem for other Resource
Types (instances, templates ) and any Resource Types in future.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.v
We missed the scenario for management servers in clustered mode. Thanks for
pointing it out.
We'll work on having a generic implementation in ResourceLimitManager to fix
the problem.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> S
hi everyone
i want to use agent-simulator project simulator agent and debug,but i
don't know how to configuration .
can you help me please ? thx
Alena and All,
Thanks, this works.
But it's not very user-friendly and straightforward, I would like to
submit a patch if necessary. candidate solutions that I can figured out
include:
1) Expose 'secondary.storage.vm' global configuration in UI.
2) Modify ResourceManagerImpl .getAvailableHyperv
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 2:32 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > 2 - Does anyone ha
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:32 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> 2 - Does anyone have an alternate suggestion for how to achieve what I
>> had hoped to achieve?
>
> Hi Chip, I did not know about Vagrant, it sounds great, but if it does not
> work you might
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 1:33 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box
>
> I've been working on encapsulating the DevCloud configuration into
Hey Fabrice,
Using the waf command you can build the rpms.
I use the following command:
./waf --package-version=3.0.3 --release-version=4 --verbose rpm
Please keep in mind that the current trunk is in motion and test carefully :-)
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 jul. 2012, at 20:52,
On Jul 12, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> 2 - Does anyone have an alternate suggestion for how to achieve what I
> had hoped to achieve?
Hi Chip, I did not know about Vagrant, it sounds great, but if it does not work
you might want to check out rpath:
http://www.rpath.com/product/rpat
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> I've been working on encapsulating the DevCloud configuration into a
> Vagrant [1] box this week. This was something that was being
> discussed on the DevCloud thread [2], but I wanted to break it out
> into a different discussion. I've rea
I've been working on encapsulating the DevCloud configuration into a
Vagrant [1] box this week. This was something that was being
discussed on the DevCloud thread [2], but I wanted to break it out
into a different discussion. I've realized that I hit a bit of a road
block, and want to get the opi
It has been considered, not implemented yet
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-9669
On 7/12/12 11:45 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
> wrote:
>> According to
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=tree
>>;f
>>
Hi Folks,
we are trying to build CloudStack from source code and deploy it our
customer environment.
We are currently able to build and run CloudStack from source, using the
ant tasks dedicated to a development environment. But we would like to
deploy our customized CloudStack in a production envi
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> According to
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=tree;f
> =patches/systemvm/debian/config/etc/cron.daily;h=e28877633af747315ca525d866
> 208bc6f8bfae03;hb=HEAD
>
>
> All log files in /var/log/cloud that ar
According to
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=tree;f
=patches/systemvm/debian/config/etc/cron.daily;h=e28877633af747315ca525d866
208bc6f8bfae03;hb=HEAD
All log files in /var/log/cloud that are older than 7 days will be
deleted.
Logrotate has been configured t
Synchronized isn't going to solve all your cases since management servers
can be clustered.
You need to use GenericDaoBase.acquireInLockTable for these kinds of
synchronization.
This kind of generic service (atomic increment up to a limit) should be in
the ResourceLimitManager.
Perhaps updateRes
> -Original Message-
> From: to...@midokura.jp [mailto:to...@midokura.jp] On Behalf Of Tomoe
> Sugihara
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:29 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] DevCloud, an all-in-one-box CloudStac
Hi Edison,
I have been playing around with DevCloud and I wanted to share
my findings here:
1. Needs more memory for guests
I'd been getting InsufficientServerCapacityException when I tried
launching a VM after rdeploy*, rdebug and adding a basic ZONE.
I found that a router VM will be spun up
Mice,
Yes, change 2 global configs you've mentioned + set
system.vm.auto.reserve.capacity to false.
-Alena.
On 7/11/12 8:20 PM, "Mice Xia" wrote:
>Hi, Alena,
>
>Im trying to follow your steps:
>
>* disable cluster
>Succeed.
>
>* enable maintenance for the primary storage in the cluster
>Mainte
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I may have missed this, but who is working on this?
>
I made the first (only?) pass at it.
See:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201207.mbox/%3CCAKprHVa5Y%3DV3uMtYaf361QbY77zAVU1M%2B7H4vTZEXk90W2DtTg%40mail
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5909/
---
(Updated July 12, 2012, 1:29 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Daml
On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:15 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> #Stance
> My personal stance is that the name should be 'Apache CloudStack' .
>
Mine as well... I see no reason to change and many reasons
for it to remain CloudStack.
Other podlings were required to rename, simply because they didn't
have the
I may have missed this, but who is working on this?
On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Marvin wrote:
>
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
> PMC.
> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
> board r
Hi all,
Thank you very much for welcoming me as a committer to Apache CloudStack. I
really appreciate it. I've never worked for open source project before, so
it's my first such experience and I like it. It's a good possibility to
work on the progressive project from progressive field.
Regards,
O
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 4:34 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Limits set for a resource can be exceeded
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:50:47AM -0400, Devdeep Singh wr
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:14:39AM -0400, Somesh Naidu wrote:
> http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-11930
>
> The above bug suggests similar for snapshots. Its marked as fixed in Acton.
It looks like a different problem. That's talking about the limit
being honored. The one Devdeep is talking ab
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-11930
The above bug suggests similar for snapshots. Its marked as fixed in Acton.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 4:34 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.a
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:50:47AM -0400, Devdeep Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I observed this issue while looking into how resource limiting
> works. When a request is placed to create a resource (instance,
> volume etc.) the check for resource limits and incrementing the
> resource count is done in th
That's true. Since you don't have any Cloudstack agent/service running on the
VR you won't find any Cloudstack specific log files on it.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Sanjeev
Currently I didn't find log4j configuration file on virtual router so it
should not be applicable to Virtual Router.The bug and the fixes are
particular to Secondary storage VM and Console proxy VM.
Thanks,
Saksham
On Thursday 12 July 2012 02:48 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu wrote:
Is this applicable
Is this applicable to Virtual Router as well?
-Original Message-
From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
Saksham Srivastava
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 3:53 PM
To: Saksham Srivastava; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request: CS-15048: Log rotation funct
33 matches
Mail list logo
