On 06/12/2012 07:45 PM, Will Chan wrote:
I've taken all the feedback so far and extended the CloudStack Maintainers
Guide written by John and added all the maintainers so far. There are probably
more missing but that's what we have today. If we want this list to be its own
page, we can cer
I agree. I know Wido has but that's about the only one that has raised their
hand in volunteering to be a maintainer. The hope is that the current
maintainers can be phased out as soon as more patches have been submitted and
more committers can be voted in to help with this.
Will
___
Is there a way to run multiple instances of CloudStack on the same server?
Something similar to Apache virtualized host would be nice. This would be only
used for development/testing never for production use. This would allow
multiple versions of CS to run in a side-by-side manner without the b
If you specify 0.0.0.0 is specified in "allowed internal sites" configuration,
system will change the default gateway to eth1 as it seems that 0.0.0.0 is used
to as a catch-all clause.
Explicitly specify a meaningful IP address of the "allowed internal sites"
instead of 0.0.0.0
Kelven
> -
This is effect of the allowed internal sites configuration. It is expected
that the management (eth1) ip is RFC 1918 (it is a waste of a perfectly usable
ipv4). Since end users can inject any URL for template download they can probe
the management network. This is why there is a firewall rule t
I saw some complains that Control + C does not work on Chrome browser, mouse
drag & drop does not work on Windows VM.
These two problems are regressions caused by replacement of the new VNC engine
inside the console proxy server a while ago. I finally got a chance to fix them
today. The fix hav
>111.111.111.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 111.111.111.18
>default via 46.136.132.1 dev eth2
Hi Heng,
The public ip address for SSVM is 111.111.111.18, the default gateway is
46.136.132.1,
Is 111.111.111.18 and 46.136.132.1 in the same broadcast domain?
If not, it won't work, bec
I saw a couple of reports on this problem but it seems that the problem is not
always reproducible. Could you share the configuration information that you are
using? I'll see if I can reproduce the problem in house so that I can take a
look at it.
Kelven
> -Original Message-
> From: Да
./client was just sent as a patch.
I've added the file-count to each directory (below) for anyone who might be
wanting to choose a small area:
agent 66 DONE
agent-simulator 142 DONE
api 720
awsapi 1030
awsapi-setup 15
build 52 DONE
client 47 DONE
cloud-cli 6 DONE
console-prox
Thanks Will, I was thinking of doing similar.
I haven't raised a hand to be a maintainer as I don't think I know any of the
modules well enough to take that roll yet, but it would be nice to see a few
more non-citrix people involved...
John
On Jun 12, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> I've
Hi
I think I know where is the problem ,seems the SSVM can not visit outside
network. it can ping the public IP address within the range, but it can not
access anything outside of the three network range which is listed below as
well as in the first Email.
So the real question is, in this network
Can we have the maintainers take responsibility for the incoming patch stream
right away?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 4:46 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Maintainer/committer model
Hi
Thanks for reply. I just added an ISO with following URL
http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum/pub/centos/6.2/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.2-x86_64-LiveDVD.iso
It still shows no route to host, and for the default template(centos 5.6),
I saw the download complete when I do the preparation for secondary stora
Sorry for misleading before. The "no route to host" means CloudStack fail to
download template to secondary storage because it cannot access the URL of
template.
>>It does download successfully during the setup.
So you have seen it's state in Ready sometimes before? And then it changed to
"No
I think it's unreasonable to ask people to change their mail infrastructure.
Even client change is quite annoying. So +1 on anything other than e-mail.
I would also add that I've found it difficult to track what has been applied
and what hasn't. Maybe when the maintainer system is fully impl
Hi
It does download successfully during the setup.
And I have pasted the traffic rule on last Email, the both port are open.
And If I mount the secondary storage to the SSVM, and write on it, there is
no error with "no route to host"
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > Hi
> Hi
>
> please refer to my reply
>
> "The first template(the centos template in which already downloaded during
> preparation) is not even working, it also shows "no route to the host""
No that means it didn't download successfully. Login SSVM, try downloading the
template you want by wget.
Y
Hi
please refer to my reply
"The first template(the centos template in which already downloaded
during preparation) is not even working, it also shows "no route to
the host""
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Because it results in the supp
From: Eric Pretorious
---
client/.classpath | 18 ++
client/.project| 18 ++
.../WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties | 15
.../classes/resources/messages_es.properties
Because it results in the suppression of the initial ARP request to the
gateway. This is how the Linux network stack reports an ARP issue.
--
Chiradeep
On Jun 12, 2012, at 16:31, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
> wrote:
>
>> You might need
Cloudstack is hypervisor agnostic (at least aims to be)
Choose the hypervisor you prefer
-sebastien
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Jewel Nuruddin
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What is the best suited hypervisor for CloudStack?
> I mean what CloudStack recommended for CloudStack, is it Xen or KVM.
>
>
I've taken all the feedback so far and extended the CloudStack Maintainers
Guide written by John and added all the maintainers so far. There are probably
more missing but that's what we have today. If we want this list to be its own
page, we can certainly do that as well but I thought it was e
On Jun 12, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> You might need to add the host ip of the web server where the templates
> are hosted to
> "secstorage.allowed.internal.sites" in the global configuration.
Why would lack of this result in no route to host. Firewall issues would die
sil
Hi
The first template(the centos template in which already downloaded
during preparation) is not even working, it also shows "no route to
the host"
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> You might need to add the host ip of the web server where the templates
> are hosted to
>
You might need to add the host ip of the web server where the templates
are hosted to
"secstorage.allowed.internal.sites" in the global configuration.
On 6/12/12 3:50 PM, "Lu Heng" wrote:
>Hi
>
>Thanks for reply
>
>First, the SSVM can mount the secondary storage, and the ssvm-check.sh is
>passed
Hi
Thanks for reply
First, the SSVM can mount the secondary storage, and the ssvm-check.sh is
passed without error. the "no route to the host" problem still exsits.
second, what should we fill in the vlan in the public network setup while
the IP is simply in the access port?
and the iptable rul
> Hi
>
> We have following setup
>
> management network(public IP range, 123.123.123.0/24) storage
> network(private IP range 10.2.0.0/24) public network(public IP range
> 111.111.111.0/24)
>
> 1 CP
> 1 Nic on management network
> 1 Nic on storage network
>
> 2*Host
> 1 Nic on management netw
This happened to two of my XenServer hosts in a CS 3.0.1 cluster.
http://pastebin.com/UpCHAuQi
>From what I can tell a MAC address got assigned? or something to the interface
>"storageNetwork1" and all hell broke loose. Somehow it managed to take down
>all of the management interfaces on the h
Hi
We have following setup
management network(public IP range, 123.123.123.0/24)
storage network(private IP range 10.2.0.0/24)
public network(public IP range 111.111.111.0/24)
1 CP
1 Nic on management network
1 Nic on storage network
2*Host
1 Nic on management network
1 Nic on storage network
1
Hi,
> Hi, I'm trying to get the servlet work on eclipse, too.
> I've read the documentation, and did as described.
> But I could not figure out the setup is useful, except searching the code.
> I wonder does anybody actually using this?
> What's the standard setup to write or debug the code?
we a
> Inline reply
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Wido den Hollander
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been working the last couple of days on rebuilding the
> > Debian/Ubuntu build system and getting rid of WAF.
> >
> > I think it got to a state where it's ready to be tested by other users.
> >
>
Inline reply
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working the last couple of days on rebuilding the Debian/Ubuntu
> build system and getting rid of WAF.
>
> I think it got to a state where it's ready to be tested by other users.
>
> The code can be found
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> I know it's been discussed in several email threads, but I would like to
> initiate a separate discussion on what tool we should use for reviweing
> the patches.
>
> Several people (including myself - using Outlook on Mac OS X Lion) have
+1 to use some tool for review rather than using emails.
I am struggling with email patches through Outlook still and haven't found a
clean solution yet.
I have no personal experience but have heard about Gerrit being good to achieve
what is being listed below by Alena.
-Prachi
-Original
I know it's been discussed in several email threads, but I would like to
initiate a separate discussion on what tool we should use for reviweing
the patches.
Several people (including myself - using Outlook on Mac OS X Lion) have
been struggling already with applying email patches using "git am".
Can you please generate the patch using command:
git diff --no-prefix > one.patch
And send it to me, I'll apply it.
-Alena.
On 6/11/12 12:41 AM, "Saksham Srivastava"
wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
>Subject: [PATCH] CS-15018: Event USER.LOGIN should contain the client
>
Hi
I have following setup, and I have one quick question, how the primary
storage talk to the secondary storage?
1 cp
1 nic on management network
2 hv(hyperviser server)
1 nic on management network
1 nic on storage network
1 nic on guest network
1 storage
1 nic on storage network
1 nic on manag
On 06/12/2012 01:36 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
I'm not familiar with packaging in unix so I'm just going to comment on some
principles. I wrote the first version of the ant build. I thought it is
important to keep compilation steps and packaging steps separate.
Yes, +1
Originally I envisione
On 06/12/2012 12:52 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
On 06/12/2012 12:59 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
Hi,
Let me prefix the message with the disclaimer that I am not much of an
expert on building Java code...
On 06/12/2012 06:24 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
I've been working the las
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> It looks like there's no objections to this proposal so I'm going to start
> work on this. It will be a bit of a mess during transition. Will try to
> keep changes to a minimal.
>
> --Alex
>
Outstanding - you're going to do this in a topic
I'm not familiar with packaging in unix so I'm just going to comment on some
principles. I wrote the first version of the ant build. I thought it is
important to keep compilation steps and packaging steps separate. Originally I
envisioned that build.xml really just compiles while packaging ca
Hi,
On 06/12/2012 07:16 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
It looks like there's no objections to this proposal so I'm going to start work
on this. It will be a bit of a mess during transition. Will try to keep
changes to a minimal.
I think it's a great idea. The packages need reconstruction anyway. (S
It looks like there's no objections to this proposal so I'm going to start work
on this. It will be a bit of a mess during transition. Will try to keep
changes to a minimal.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:32 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@inc
Hi,
On 06/12/2012 12:59 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
Hi,
Let me prefix the message with the disclaimer that I am not much of an
expert on building Java code...
On 06/12/2012 06:24 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
I've been working the last couple of days on rebuilding the
Debian/Ubuntu buil
committed thanks for the patch
committed, thanks for the patch
committed, thanks for the patch
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> From 974a72c00c8d93fc5217eab920e5d04d392b34f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chip Childers
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:31:53 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Modified license headers for the cloud-cli dir.
>
>
> Si
committed, thanks for the patch!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> From 974a72c00c8d93fc5217eab920e5d04d392b34f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chip Childers
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:31:53 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Modified license headers for the cloud-cli dir.
>
>
> S
committed, thanks for the patch!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> From 725fb4164ed08b00915c84f0c14b7cb4795c9870 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chip Childers
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:57:01 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] License update for daemonize folder.
>
>
> Signed-
>From 725fb4164ed08b00915c84f0c14b7cb4795c9870 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chip Childers
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:57:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] License update for daemonize folder.
Signed-off-by: Chip Childers
---
daemonize/COPYING | 26 --
daemonize/daemon
Hi David,
thank you for feedback. Nitin Mehta has already written to me about git, I
will use git instead of diffs.
Thanks,
Olga
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:15 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Olga,
>
> Thanks for jumping in and working on all of these UI bugs, we are
> thrilled to have the help.
> I s
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Eric wrote:
>> ./build was just sent as a patch.
>
> Eric - I didn't see that come through... perhaps you need to resend it?
>
>> I'll begin working on ./client.
>
> With those two directories, here's where
Olga,
Thanks for jumping in and working on all of these UI bugs, we are
thrilled to have the help.
I see you are already subscribed to the list. Don't hesitate to call
attention to the patches on this list if they aren't getting
attention. Sadly we are all easily distracted and occasionally miss
t
Hi Olga,
I am also a UI developer here. I have reviewed most of your diffs which you
have attached with the respective bug tickets and will look at the remaining
ones very soon .They look good to me. I 'll also ask Jessica /Brian ( Senior
UI developers here ) to merge your patches once they
Thanks for the patch Eric, I've committed this.
--David
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:56 AM, wrote:
> From: eric pretorious
>
> ---
> build/build-aws-api.properties | 1 -
> build/build-aws-api.xml | 18 ++
> build/build-cloud.propertie
From: eric pretorious
---
build/build-aws-api.properties |1 -
build/build-aws-api.xml| 18 ++
build/build-cloud.properties |1 -
build/build-cloud.xml | 18 +-
build/bu
This is good work Olga. Were you able to subscribe to the lists I forwarded you
below ? If not, I advise you to do so asap. There is a way for you to submit
your work in form of patches. Refer to the wiki
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/Git+workflow+in+the+brave+new+world#Gitworkflowinth
Hi
I didn't see anything interesting here. Here is the most recent version(but
I have looked at the rotated vew ones, looks the same)
[13125] 2012-06-12 05:01:41.648419 VMOPS enter get_rule_logs_for_vms
[13125] 2012-06-12 05:01:41.683571 VMOPS enter
network_rules_for_rebooted_vm
I am assuming you are using Xenserver. Log in to the hypervisor. "cd
/var/log/". Here you can find the logs. These logs get rotated so be sure to
search in all of them.
I am asking to you to look here because the operation
PrimaryStorageDownloadCommand is failing which downloads the template fro
Hi,
Let me prefix the message with the disclaimer that I am not much of an
expert on building Java code...
On 06/12/2012 06:24 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
I've been working the last couple of days on rebuilding the
Debian/Ubuntu build system and getting rid of WAF.
I think it got to a
Hi,
I've been working the last couple of days on rebuilding the
Debian/Ubuntu build system and getting rid of WAF.
I think it got to a state where it's ready to be tested by other users.
The code can be found at Github [0] under my user "wido".
The goals I had were:
* Get rid of WAF
* Do eve
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Eric wrote:
> ./build was just sent as a patch.
Eric - I didn't see that come through... perhaps you need to resend it?
> I'll begin working on ./client.
With those two directories, here's where I think we stand:
agent - Chip sent a patch to the dev list, but
>From 974a72c00c8d93fc5217eab920e5d04d392b34f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chip Childers
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:31:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Modified license headers for the cloud-cli dir.
Signed-off-by: Chip Childers
---
cloud-cli/bindir/cloud-tool | 17 +
cloud-cl
Hi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Lu - With the information provided it seems that the system vm template
> and secondary storage have been configured correctly.
> Let's circle back to the error in the logs then. Can you try and manually
> mount the entire path (1.1.128.2:
Hi, I'm trying to get the servlet work on eclipse, too.
I've read the documentation, and did as described.
But I could not figure out the setup is useful, except
searching the code.
I wonder does anybody actually using this?
What's the standard setup to write or debug the code?
I could not unders
65 matches
Mail list logo
