Cloudstack 3.0.2: Specifying NFS ver. 3

Is it possible to specify the NFS version protocol (i.e., mount -t nfs -o vers=3 server:/export /mountpoint) when configuring the primary storage for  a basic installation? (The storage server in question is utilizing GlusterFS 3.2.6 - which does not support NFS ver. 4.) TIA, Eric Pretorious Tr

RE: 3.0.2 - KVM Agent problem? Please help.

Sounds like your libvirt can't create a storage pool. Can you try the following command: 1. cat >> storage.xml << EOF 304424d9-db34-40d9-b0a7-3bd689b0b862 304424d9-db34-40d9-b0a7-3bd689b0b862 /mnt/304424d9-db34-40d9-b0a7-3bd689b0b862 2. virsh pool-create storage.xml 3. Any

Re: 3.0.2 - KVM Agent problem? Please help.

Hi , Thanks for your patch. It's solved the critical problem with Re-Start the instances ! =) ( In my setup only HA instances have shared storage ) But problem with snapshot's on "Running Instances" still exist 2012-06-05 19:15:52,853 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) R

RE: [PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules...

> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartm...@tls.net] > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:17 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules... > > On 6/5/2012 10:19 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > >> Great diagram!

Re: [PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules...

On 6/5/2012 10:19 AM, Alex Huang wrote: Great diagram! I have a silly question though, is there any particular reason why cloud-orchestration was selected over cloud-management? That's a good question. The management server is actually two parts. The first part is the orchestration engine (

Re: [PATCH] Adding support for file copy to marvin's remoteSSHClient

>> This inherently looks ok, but Paramiko that you use in the above patch >> is licensed LGPLv2 - and needs to be removed[1]. Before we perpetuate >> its use, would you take a look at: >> >> http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14998 >> http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14999 >> http://bugs.clou

Re: [PATCH] Adding support for file copy to marvin's remoteSSHClient

> > Test client doesn't include the paramkio source code into its directory, the > migration tool(tools/migration) does. > Test client doesn't include it, but appears to make use of it. The migration tool (based on the page I linked to - assuming that's correct) says it was for 1.0->2.1 migratio

RE: [PATCH] Adding support for file copy to marvin's remoteSSHClient

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 8:27 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adding support for file copy to marvin's > remoteSSHClient > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Prasanna Santhanam > wr

Re: CloudStack gathering around LinuxConNA?

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote: > On 06/01/2012 10:48 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:51 AM, David Nalley  wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> $dayjob has reserved some space in San Diego immediately preceeding >>> LinuxConNA [1] (Aug 29-31) during wh

Re: CloudStack gathering around LinuxConNA?

On 06/01/2012 10:48 PM, David Nalley wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:51 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, $dayjob has reserved some space in San Diego immediately preceeding LinuxConNA [1] (Aug 29-31) during which they plan to hold XenSummit [2] (Aug 27-28) - and they have some excess room sp

Re: [PATCH] Adding support for file copy to marvin's remoteSSHClient

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santhanam > --- >  tools/marvin/marvin/remoteSSHClient.py |   11 ++- >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/marvin/marvin/remoteSSHClient.py > b/tools/marvin/marvin/re

Re: Download page still points to Github

good catch - I just put this on my todo to fix - hopefully it will get done today. On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > The download page on the website is still pointing to Github: > http://cloudstack.org/download.html > > I think that one has been forgotten while

RE: [PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules...

> Great diagram! I have a silly question though, is there any particular reason > why cloud-orchestration was selected over cloud-management? > That's a good question. The management server is actually two parts. The first part is the orchestration engine (cloud-orchestration). The second pa

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jun 2012 ([ppmc])

Hi, On 06/04/2012 07:40 PM, David Nalley wrote: Folks, This report is due on Wednesday - (2 days from now) - I went for an initial draft, but it doesn't feel quite complete - others please hack on this. I'm not sure if this should be in a PPMC report, but I've started to rebuild the Debian

Re: [PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules...

Great diagram! I have a silly question though, is there any particular reason why cloud-orchestration was selected over cloud-management? Matthew On 6/5/2012 7:53 AM, Alex Huang wrote: It's a little hard to describe in text. Please see http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/New+Packaging+Pro

[PROPOSAL] Further refinement of CloudStack modules...

It's a little hard to describe in text. Please see http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/New+Packaging+Proposal --Alex

Re: Proposal to use OSGi for component modularity

> > Hi Ioannis, > > Any information you need from CloudStack to get started? For now, I am still trying to get more familiar with the project. By the way did you mentioned that you are going to switch to maven build or there were just thoughts about it? -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource

[PATCH] Adding support for file copy to marvin's remoteSSHClient

Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santhanam --- tools/marvin/marvin/remoteSSHClient.py | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/marvin/marvin/remoteSSHClient.py b/tools/marvin/marvin/remoteSSHClient.py index 8836844..4063b33 100644 --- a/tools/marvin/marvin/

Download page still points to Github

Hi, The download page on the website is still pointing to Github: http://cloudstack.org/download.html I think that one has been forgotten while changing? Wido