On Dec 10, 2:59 pm, falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you describe in-core editing a bit more? Sounds interesting.
The canonical structure editor (not "structured editor") is probably
Interlisp-D's SEDIT, or its predecessor DEDIT. (See
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/xerox/interlisp/3102300_i
;
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 06:32, evins.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: In core structure editor, anyone?
>
> > Structure editors are not in common use, maybe because, while they're
> > a valid and maybe cool alternative to text editors for lisp code,
&g
On Dec 11, 12:39 pm, TNeste wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2:15 pm, Simon Brooke wrote:
>
> > I note people seem mainly to be using Emacs as an editing/development
> > environment for Clojure. But as people keep pointing out, Clojure is
> > homoiconic; the canonical source of a function is not a stream o
On Dec 11, 9:08 pm, Chouser wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Robert Koberg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Would it be desirable to further define keywords such that it allows a
> > special kind of namespacing.
>
> > * This could allow for more efficient (for the user) and targeted
> > navigat
On Dec 18, 7:18 pm, "Mark McGranaghan" wrote:
> I've likewise though a fair bit about this, but haven't been able to
> come up with a particularly satisfying solution.
>
> One approach I've considered is a watcher-type system where
> persistence is defined in terms of immutable snapshots and ap
On Jan 21, 1:33 pm, Rich Hickey wrote:
> I've started documenting the streams work I have been doing, for those
> interested:
>
> http://clojure.org/streams
>
> Feedback welcome,
>
> Rich
This work reminds me in a general way of the old Dylan iteration
protocol. They're not the same, and the D
On Jan 19, 12:38 am, David Nolen wrote:
> Of course it might be the case that not many people are interested in the
> implementing ideas from CLOS for Clojure
It's definitely interesting. I'd like to have eql specializers and the
ability to build hierarchies of arbitrary types (e.g. a hierarch
On Jun 25, 12:59 am, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
> Their concerns are thus:
>
> 1. How do you get Clojure programmers? Lisp is not for the faint hearted.
You advertise for programmers and include Clojure, Lisp, Java, and
functional programming on the roster of desirable skills. Lisp hackers
wa
On Jan 12, 1:50 am, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On 11 Jan 2010, at 23:09, .Bill Smith wrote:
>
> > Every class object has a newInstance method:
>
> > user=> (Class/forName "java.util.HashMap")
> > java.util.HashMap
> > user=> (.newInstance (Class/forName "java.util.HashMap"))
> > #
> > user=>
>
> > I
On Mar 4, 7:33 am, Jan Rychter wrote:
> I haven't hacked on new Clojure stuff for the past two months or
> so. Now, having updated my repositories, I find that everybody just
> dropped ant and moved to leiningen.
>
> I tried to make sense of things, but can't. I must be missing something
> big h
Hey, guys. Suppose I wanted to tinker around with a compiler for Clojure on
a new back-end. What would you guess is the best starting point (perhaps
ClojureScript?), and what's the best spec to use to ensure compliance with
the language?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 7:09:39 PM UTC-6, Alan Moore wrote:
>
> It kind of depends on the backend you are targeting. If it looks and
> smells like the JVM you might look at ClojureCLR.
>
> If it looks like Python see Clojure-metal by Timothy B.
>
> The ClojureScript compiler was optimi
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 9:11:38 PM UTC-6, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> The reference documentation is available here, starting with the Reader at
> this link, but continuing on with all of the other topics you see on the
> left hand side of this page, such as Evaluation, Special Forms, M
On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 4:13:23 AM UTC-6, puzzler wrote:
>
> Yes, unfortunately, Clojure doesn't have an actual spec. The lack of a
> spec probably helps keep the language more "agile", but I know several
> people who automatically discount the language because of that.
>
I don't disc
On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 1:31:40 PM UTC-6, puzzler wrote:
>
> Look here for some compliance tests:
> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/tree/master/test/clojure/test_clojure
>
>
Excellent; thank you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure"
On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 2:17:19 PM UTC-6, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>
> You could also consider implementing an interpreter
>
That's precisely what I am considering--an interpreter or compiler--and
exactly why I'm asking these questions.
--
You received this message because you are subscr
On Jun 22, 12:57 pm, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've recently started learning Clojure. For the past year or so I've
> been using CouchDB, and am very happy with the MVCC disk storage
> system it uses. Has anyone tried marrying the two system systems to
> create a truly persistent
On Jun 18, 9:52 am, rob levy wrote:
> As an informal survey of people who use both Clojure and Common Lisp for
> different projects, what do you see as the main determining factors behind
> your choice to use either Clojure or Common Lisp for a project, given the
> present state of Clojure. Let
On Aug 13, 11:32 am, Quzanti wrote:
>
> The only two implications I can think o
> (1) Hardly helpful for people's confidence in the Java Platform, if
> Oracle embarks on these kind of surprise antics. May push people
> towards CLR. If Oracle start getting aggressive, then everyone will
> start wor
On Aug 19, 10:39 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> I just pushed out a new release of Leiningen, a Clojure build tool,
> with lots of help from many contributors.
>
> This adds a couple new tasks (test! and interactive) and the ability to chain
> tasks. It also allows for user-level init scripts and u
I'm working on a project in which it would be very useful to be able
to easily determine how many characters were consumed in the course of
a read operation, in a similar fashion to the way that Common Lisp's
read-from-string returns as a second value the index of the next
character of the input pa
On Aug 28, 1:41 am, Robert McIntyre wrote:
> I took a stab at it and came up with this:
> is that what you're going for?
I was actually asking how to avoid doing what you did :-). If it's
necessary to do it, that's fine, but I thought I'd ask first, in case
there was a way around it that I had
22 matches
Mail list logo
