On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 4:13:23 AM UTC-6, puzzler wrote: > > Yes, unfortunately, Clojure doesn't have an actual spec. The lack of a > spec probably helps keep the language more "agile", but I know several > people who automatically discount the language because of that. >
I don't discount it; it's a good language with a good ecosystem. A spec would be nice when writing an implementation, though. Even more convenient would be a suite of compliance tests. I can use the linked reference docs, of course, but it's more work to slog through them, and is exactly what I was hoping to avoid. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
