Re: Clojure 1.5.0 RC 1

2012-12-23 Thread Softaddicts
t; To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group

Re: Clojure 1.5.0 RC 1

2012-12-23 Thread Softaddicts
ojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more opt

Re: Will the JVM will always likely, remain the primary Clojure implementation ?

2012-12-28 Thread Softaddicts
clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojur

Re: Will the JVM will always likely, remain the primary Clojure implementation ?

2012-12-28 Thread Softaddicts
OpenJDK is. > Also: Isn't the JVM open source? > > - Eric MacAdie > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Softaddicts > wrote: > > > Given the number of JVM implementations available, I think you can qualify > > this > > as a low risk for the near

Re: Will the JVM will always likely, remain the primary Clojure implementation ?

2012-12-28 Thread Softaddicts
o the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegro

Re: Will the JVM will always likely, remain the primary Clojure implementation ?

2012-12-29 Thread Softaddicts
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups

Re: Will the JVM will always likely, remain the primary Clojure implementation ?

2012-12-30 Thread Softaddicts
> -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with &g

Re: How to call a Java method that expects a ".class" parameter.

2013-01-05 Thread Softaddicts
ew members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddicts sent by ibisMail from my

Re: How to call a Java method that expects a ".class" parameter.

2013-01-05 Thread Softaddicts
clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/

Re: Convincing employer to go for Clojure

2013-01-08 Thread Softaddicts
e of data > >> manipulation with a functional language, etc.) > >> > >> Best, > >> David > >> > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this

Re: Full stack Clojure web/REST framework - is there any mileage in it?

2013-01-13 Thread Softaddicts
nsistent and easily usable. > > > > Is this another barrier to adoption the Clojure community can remove? Is > > this even a barrier? Am I missing something? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > [Also posted to http://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure] > > > > -

Re: Bug with 1.3 primitive function return value hinting.

2011-12-15 Thread Softaddicts
ted that same input. I > can't see any way of interpreting that as "not a bug". > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note

Re: Bug with 1.3 primitive function return value hinting.

2011-12-15 Thread Softaddicts
ng a map, ... All these options are much more easier and accessible than implementing/modifying the numeric optimizations. Luc P > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Softaddicts > wrote: > > Hi Cedric, > > > > Your statement " A limitation on primitive arguments si

Re: Bug with 1.3 primitive function return value hinting.

2011-12-15 Thread Softaddicts
It's not "silly", it's the fastest way to dispatch fn calls... > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Softaddicts > wrote: > > From a JVM perspective, f(& arglist) is a one arg function. > > Try defining a fn with more than 20 args and you will get the

Re: Bug with 1.3 primitive function return value hinting.

2011-12-15 Thread Softaddicts
may impact your approach in the near future. Luc > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Softaddicts > wrote: > > It's not "silly", it's the fastest way to dispatch fn calls... > > Only calls with more than 20 arguments (or via "apply") would need &

Re: Should read-string support \x.. escaped characters?

2011-12-24 Thread Softaddicts
t; Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For

Re: Clojure list syntax sugar: f(x) notation

2011-12-26 Thread Softaddicts
on for function call, and (op > x) for operator. > > I like to hear from the community what kind of dark corner the > proposed syntax sugar may run into. > > Thanks, > Louis > > > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you a

Re: Clojure list syntax sugar: f(x) notation

2011-12-27 Thread Softaddicts
gt; wrote: > > > > > > The proposed syntax sugar does not break the existing code > > > > > clojure.core=> map(first [[1] [2]]) > > > # > > > [1] > > > > > Ambrose > > > > -- > > Luc P. > > > > ===

Re: Clojure list syntax sugar: f(x) notation

2011-12-27 Thread Softaddicts
ng item of the following list, otherwise it is a > regular item in the current list context. > > Louis > > On Dec 27, 4:16 pm, Softaddicts wrote: > > So if I understand correctly, your proposal makes the absence/presence of > > space pivotal > > in making the de

Re: Clojure list syntax sugar: f(x) notation

2011-12-27 Thread Softaddicts
lojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options,

Re: Clojure list syntax sugar: f(x) notation

2011-12-29 Thread Softaddicts
Why not create a klingon version ? > How about using a and b instead of ( ) so we could have faab which would be > the equivalent of (f a) so it would rule out symbolnames with an a in any > place but the first it, also we could go for less used characters as I don't > know ¥ and µ for exampl

Re: Clojure list syntax sugar: f(x) notation

2011-12-29 Thread Softaddicts
oup, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddicts sent by ibisMail! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To po

Re: Clojure list syntax sugar: f(x) notation

2011-12-30 Thread Softaddicts
m new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddicts sent by ibisMail! -

Re: Storing clojure lists and maps in Redis

2012-01-03 Thread Softaddicts
roup, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > > -- > Baishampayan Ghose > b.ghose at gmail.com > > -- > You received this message because yo

Re: Help! Migrating to 1.3.0

2012-01-13 Thread Softaddicts
ot; group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options,

Re: Multimethods performance in ClojureScript.

2012-01-18 Thread Softaddicts
e moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- Softaddicts sent by ibisMail! -- You received this mes

Re: newline question

2012-02-06 Thread Softaddicts
jure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure

<    1   2   3   4