Re: docstrings of if-let and when-let incorrect

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Walter Tetzner wrote: > On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:41:58 PM UTC-4, Dan Cross wrote: >> My own personal opinion is that it makes sense in combination with 'and', >> but others may feel differently.  E.g., >> >>     (when-let [a

Re: docstrings of if-let and when-let incorrect

are in > scope and what would be their values? None of the bindings should be in scope. - Dan C. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from ne

Re: question about cons function

Hi Nicholas! I think the answer you're looking for is best explained by Michał in this StackOverflow post: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3008411/clojure-seq-cons-vs-list-conj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this grou

Resources on optimizing Clojure code

out there. Thanks in advance, dan kefford -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post.

Re: Resources on optimizing Clojure code

is nowhere near optimal, and I know that in order to efficiently solve a lot of the Euler problems, you cannot simply brute force them; you need to choose your algorithm wisely. Anyway... any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. dan kefford On Nov 2, 4:52 pm, Alan wrote: > Usually it'

Re: Resources on optimizing Clojure code

One idea that I had was to inline the factoring logic into twice- composite. Who cares about the factors? We just want to know if there are two or not: (defn twice-composite? [n] (loop [ps prime-seq tmp n p-count 0] (if (< 2 p-count) false (if (= 1 tmp)

Re: a handy little function I haven't seen before

George this is super cool! I can't wait to see this show up in swank-clojure *ahem* Phil. On Feb 2, 2011, at 12:03 PM, George Jahad wrote: > > show's a very cool function, but has a different purpose, (afaik). > > It displays the structure of an instance, but not it's contents. get- > all-f

Re: newby problems running clojure on Mac OS X

ant and svn are in /usr/bin/ on my leopard install, which means they either came with OS X itself or the OS X development tools. I'd check if you've got them already before installing. On Nov 10, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Justin Henzie wrote: > > I am using the svn version 1086 and this works fin

<    1   2   3