On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Aaron Cohen <aa...@assonance.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Walter Tetzner
> <robot.ninja.saus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To make the bindings work like let, where later bindings can see previous
>> bindings, I think the most natural way to do it is to have the bindings
>> behave like the maybe monad.
>> [...]
>
> Saying something is obvious and then using the word monad a paragraph later
> is contradictory. ;)
Hypothetically, "this is obvious, unlike most monads." Zing!
> What should happen on the else branch of the if-let; which bindings are in
> scope and what would be their values?
None of the bindings should be in scope.
- Dan C.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
