You can avoid conflicts. The ns you start executing in dev may exist only
on the dev source-paths, and when it configures the rest of your program
(putting functions in closure and whatnot) it can do so drawing from stuff
that's only going to be available in the dev profile. Then when you build
Scipy/Numpy had a head start in this area long before others should up in
the Open source space.
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 10:46:18 PM UTC-4, Mars0i wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 5:17:15 PM UTC-5, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2017 5:05 PM, wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Th
But why is it bad news if your competition don't use the best tool
available (if it is true, of course)? I consider it a competitive advantage.
On the other hand, it is perfectly clear why everyone uses Python for ML
and (almost) nobody uses Clojure:
1) All serious literature is in Python. There
Is Clojure so great at AI, ML, NLP and concurrent programming?
It seems to me the libraries are lacking. I also know there's a race for
performance, and it looks like CPU parallelization isn't even fast enough, so
distributed or GPU based solutions are being built, which I'm also not sure
Cloju
Clojure offers full support for GPU computing. See
http://clojurecl.uncomplicate.org, as far as I know, Python doesn't have so
well integrated GPU programming. It also supports full high-performance CPU
acceleration. Also, although Neanderthal
(http://neanderthal.uncomplicate.org) is not yet on
Yes, if you have a 'product' perspective, but others will have a service
provider perspective and would like to see employers committed to Clojure
and looking to engage with practitioners.+
On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 4:49:45 AM UTC+11, Dragan Djuric wrote:
>
>
> Isn't it advantageous in some
Sure, I agree. I'm just saying that whoever would like to see whatever,
they'll have to commit some work or money into making it happen, or change
their preferences to other stuff :). For example, if someone is a
programmer who would like to learn ML to be able to land a better job, and
this employ
> doesn't drive me mad, but it does puzzle ans annoy
> me. puzzle: why is it? not sure, personally.
I've seen this pattern at the last 2 startups that I've worked at:
The startup hires a bunch of people as they graduate from college. They are
hired to do data analysis, typically on some kind
