project.clj was missing during the first commit. It's corrected, you
should be able to use "lein run -m" to run examples.
0.1.0-SNAPSHOT is effectively 0.1.0 ill-named but since I notice that
the anelemma library was removed from Clojars, I added my own version
and updated all dependencies. If you
Hello.
In clojure-contrib 1.2, lazy-xml/emit outputs XML in most cases.
However, if it gets HTML or similar format data, the output format is
switched to HTML.
That makes some differences at least on OpenJDK6.
1. In XML mode, output doesn't contain any extra \n if :indent is
skipped. In HTML mode
On 4 Mag, 06:53, Luc Prefontaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> being tired of wandering through a few thousand lines of XML Spring bean
> definitions, I finally wrote a library
> to start moving away from Spring/XML. It's definitively nicer doing
> dependency injection/auto-wiring using Clojure.
>
> This is
On 4 Mag, 01:34, Chris Perkins wrote:
> On May 3, 5:22 pm, André Thieme wrote:
>
> > Some of the limitations:
> > 1. (defmacro x [] `(let [a# ~(atom 0)]))
>
> > 2. (defmacro y [] `(let [a# ~(comp inc inc)])) ; from that link
>
> > 3. (defmacro z [] `(let [a# ~((fn [x#] (fn [] x#)) 0)]))
>
> > All
> For example Common Lisp does support this.
That's not true, or at least it's only partly true.
Here's a translation of your example into Common Lisp (I added a use
of a# in the macro to avoid compiler optimization making the problem
go away):
(defun f (x) (lambda () x))
(defparameter foo (
I am new comer for clojure, I concern that when will clojure surpport
Distribution function like erLang
yeah, the up is my question.
and I want to know is there any roadmap for clojure ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this
On May 3, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
>> FWIW, click-and-hold on the back or forward buttons in your browser will
>> give you the "breadcrumbs" you're looking for.
>
> Hmm... that means taking the mouse out of the atlas and interacting
> with the chrome of its surroundings...
Any
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:57 AM, yanzhao ye wrote:
> I am new comer for clojure, I concern that when will clojure surpport
> Distribution function like erLang
>
> yeah, the up is my question.
> and I want to know is there any roadmap for clojure ?
Take a look at Jobim for Erlang style distributed
Clojure doesn't currently provide features for distributed computation
across multiple machines. It focuses on the problem of concurrency within a
single machine. However, there are many libraries for the JVM designed to
support distributed computation. Message-queue systems like ActiveMQ and
apply-macro is a bad idea because it evaluates a macro at runtime. Macros
are supposed to be evaluated at compile-time, so apply-macro breaks
assumptions about how macros are supposed to work. It's basically a back
door into `eval`, which is considered bad style in Lisp-like languages.
-Stuar
Hello all,
I just pushed out two new releases.
* [org.clojure/tools.macro "0.1.0"]
** Includes all the bits from c.c.macro-utils and name-with-attributes
from c.c.def. Thanks to Konrad who did the initial leg work for this
* [org.clojure/core.incubator "0.1.0]
** Includes the bits from c.c.cor
André Thieme writes:
> Please try this minimal example in your REPL:
> (defn f [x] (fn [] x)) ; the closure factory
> (def foo (f 0)) ; a useful instance
> (defmacro bar [] `(let [a# ~foo]))
> and then call (bar)
I'm new to Clojure and don't have much experience with Lisps in general,
but trying
Hello David,
thanks for your work. It is very interesting addition.
One thing that came to my mind, is a language Mercury:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(programming_language)
http://www.mercury.csse.unimelb.edu.au/
"Mercury is a new logic/functional programming language, which combines th
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Frantisek Sodomka wrote:
> Hello David,
> thanks for your work. It is very interesting addition.
>
> One thing that came to my mind, is a language Mercury:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(programming_language)
> http://www.mercury.csse.unimelb.edu.au/
>
>
M
> 3. (defmacro z [] `(let [a# ~((fn [x#] (fn [] x#)) 0)]))
>
> All three calls fail, (x) and (y) and (z).
> I see no plausible reason why it *should* be that way.
As it's been pointed out, the compiler won't re-compile compiled
code.
Those macros work if you don't unquote the expressions:
(defmacr
Hi to everyone,
due to the lack of documentation I'm struggling with the good Enlive
library.
I'm trying to get the meta keywords from a web page, to be clearer
from this:
I want to extract only the content part. I've tried with something
like this:
(defn get-keywords-from
"Given the HTML URL
Thanks everyone for attending the first meeting. It was great to talk
clojure with some like minded people who are excited by the
possibilities !
Our next meeting is scheduled for May 16th 630PM - 900PM @
Rubedo, inc.
14580 Beltwood Pkwy E Suite 103
Farmers Branch, TX 75244
(wifi available)
Rig
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Frantisek Sodomka wrote:
> Mercury is an amazing project. In fact the original miniKanren (on which
> core.logic is based) designers were well aware of it and even based their
> soft-cut and committed choice no
On 4 Mag, 16:29, "Marshall T. Vandegrift" wrote:
> André Thieme writes:
> > Please try this minimal example in your REPL:
> > (defn f [x] (fn [] x)) ; the closure factory
> > (def foo (f 0)) ; a useful instance
> > (defmacro bar [] `(let [a# ~foo]))
> > and then call (bar)
>
> I'm new to Clojure
On May 3, 5:22 pm, André Thieme wrote:
> Am 02.05.2011 23:14, schrieb David Nolen:
>
> > The relevant clojure-dev thread.
> >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev/browse_thread/thread/f4907...
>
> > It's not clear whether the core team and the various contributors are
> > interested in suppor
On May 4, 8:50 am, Simon Katz wrote:
> > For example Common Lisp does support this.
>
> That's not true, or at least it's only partly true.
>
> Here's a translation of your example into Common Lisp (I added a use
> of a# in the macro to avoid compiler optimization making the problem
> go away):
>
You can use the erlang-otp Java library from Clojure.
I think there are bindings on github. If not, they are simple to
generate.
(I actually had clojure hooked up to a yaws webserver (yaws pattern
matches requests, clojure generates pages) for a while, using LFE and
the OTP libraries. Clojure wri
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
> Any breadcrumb navigation would require mousing around a bit
Unless it was entirely driven by keyboard shortcuts :)
> Perhaps you're hoping for an 'up' that was equivalent to two 'back' actions…?
Probably. Like I say, maybe I just need to wo
Alessio Stalla writes:
> The key point is that in Lisp "code" does not mean "text" [1]. Code is
> made of data structures - lists, symbols, vectors, numbers, ... - and
> macros are just functions that operate on those data structures.
Hmm, interesting. One of the things that's drawn me to learn
On May 4, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
>> Any breadcrumb navigation would require mousing around a bit
>
> Unless it was entirely driven by keyboard shortcuts :)
>
>> Perhaps what might be useful is a quick way to show the graph o
Am 04.05.2011 14:50, schrieb Simon Katz:
For example Common Lisp does support this.
That's not true, or at least it's only partly true.
Here's a translation of your example into Common Lisp (I added a use
of a# in the macro to avoid compiler optimization making the problem
go away):
(defun
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:31 PM, André Thieme wrote:
> You need to wrap it into eval-when or separate functions and macros from
> their use into different files and make sure the right load order is
> used. Then this will work in CL.
Which are probably some of the reasons Clojure chose not to sup
On May 4, 11:31 pm, André Thieme wrote:
> Am 04.05.2011 14:50, schrieb Simon Katz:
>
> >> For example Common Lisp does support this.
>
> > That's not true, or at least it's only partly true.
>
> > Here's a translation of your example into Common Lisp (I added a use
> > of a# in the macro to avoid
On 3/05/2011 23:58, Allen Johnson wrote:
IMHO c.j.j/resultset-seq should perform something like the following:
;; i want my columns as strings exactly how they are in the db
(resultset-seq rs)
(resultset-seq rs identity)
;; i want my columns as lower-case keywords
(resultset-seq rs (comp keyw
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Simon Katz wrote:
> It is not possible to write out a function object (something returned
> by lambda, Common Lisp's equivalent of fn) to a compiled file. No mix
> of eval-when, separating functions and macros, and load order can
> change that.
The same is not tru
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> Note that instantiating the class with 4 gives us an add-4-to function
> instead of the original add-3-to function here. To actually convert
> that particular closure into code that reproduces it, the array of
> constructor arguments needs to be
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> Closures, including ones whose arguments can't be known until runtime,
> can easily be slapped with "implements Serializable" if they haven't
> been already. Indeed, an "extends Serializable" on IFn, on top of the
> above compiler modification to
I don't think it's flexible enough to attach this to the connection. I
work with databases where some groups of tables really need different
naming strategies than others so I would definitely want these
conversions available per operation - which is how c.j.j naming
strategies currently work so it
33 matches
Mail list logo
