On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Brian Carper wrote:
> On Sep 9, 3:13 pm, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>> Can you clarify? Maven-aware build tools (e.g. Leiningen) should not
>> be trying to downlaod the "clojure-contrib:complete" JAR file.
>> Instead, referencing the "complete" project as a dependency s
Call for Proposals - ACCU 2011
April 13-16, 2011. Barcelo Oxford Hotel, Oxford, UK
Submission deadline: 26th of September 2010
Email proposals to: Giovanni Asproni, confere...@accu.org
http://www.accu.org/conference
twitter: @accu2011 #accu2011
We invite you to propose a session for this leading s
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Luke Renn wrote:
> On Sep 9, 4:13 pm, Mike Meyer 620...@mired.org> wrote:
> > Here I thought I could save time by choosing a nice, simple example
> > application that everyone would understand, rather than spending a lot
> > of time explaining (or abstract
On Sep 9, 7:00 pm, Aaron Cohen wrote:
> I think the problem is that the "complete" pom needs to have
> pom to indicate there's not an important jar
> file to download.
It does. That's why I'm confused.
http://github.com/clojure/clojure-contrib/blob/master/modules/complete/pom.xml
Admittedly, I
Weird. I'll have to look into this some more. Thanks for the report.
-S
On Sep 9, 6:43 pm, Brian Carper wrote:
> Nope. When I use [org.clojure.contrib/complete "1.3.0-SNAPSHOT"]
> without :classifier "bin", Maven dies because it can't find the
> "complete" JAR file. Like this:http://gist.github
On Sep 9, 5:53 pm, Lee Spector wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Luke Renn wrote:
>
> > What exactly are you evaluating Clojure for? Because unless it's
> > teaching elementary school children, the LOC it takes to deploy a
> > hello world webapp is irrelevant.
>
> > Luke
>
> From the sidelines
I'm not 100% sure what you're asking, but I think I understand you,
and in that case you can refer to
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/9c7f726709e24c12/b2e2696b70d924f2?show_docid=b2e2696b70d924f2,
in which I ask this very question and get the answers I am looking
for.
O
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Mike Meyer
wrote:
> No, they've explained what *they* consider to be simple. That isn't
> the same thing as actually *being* simple.
+1 :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send e
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Rainer Schuster wrote:
> no this discussion is going to be ... won't say it.
>
> Quiz:
>
> - is your solution functional (regarding the requirements=
Yes.
> - is your solution scallable? (groing large or running
> plattformindependent?)
It will run on
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Luke Renn wrote:
> That was kind of my point. I would expect these kinds of questions,
> examples, and objections from someone looking at Clojure/Ring to teach
> with, not necessarily someone who want to deploy highly scalable web
> applications.
I'm curio
On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:36 PM, David Nolen wrote:
>
> I started using Processing since version 22 (around 2003/4). Let's just
> say... that it takes a lot of time and external contribution to reach the
> level of documentation, stability and cross platform reliability that
> Processing now has.
i don't know if this has been said as such, but:
a) there's an inflection / transition point from "simple things" to
"complex things".
b) some systems are in the simple world, but when you get complex they
restrict you or fall apart (rails?).
vs.
other systems are fine in the large, but suck for
On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Luke Renn wrote:
> I'm sure many here would disagree with me, but I would not recommend
> Clojure for a college level Lisp course just yet. I would probably
> recommend Racket or Dr. Scheme.
>
I've taught with Dr. Scheme but I like Clojure a lot better than Scheme!
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:07 PM, John Fingerhut wrote:
> Some of the Haskell submissions are quite long for what they do. The
> k-nucleotide one, for example, implements a mutable hash table using
> features in Haskell that I had never seen before looking at that program.
> Did they need to write
I am running into a problem sometimes when I call a certain macro I
defined. This problem macro (and an associated problem function) is:
http://gist.github.com/572875
I run into this error (which is at a call to the macro, but *not* at
the *first* time it's called for some reason!):
http://gist.
alux wrote ..
> Interesting discussion!
>
> I think about taking some of the topics into separate threads. Will
> see, I'm a bit under project pressure. Wont tell you the language ;(
>
> But, @Luc
> "pushing the advantage of Lisp
> macros to the forefront is not obvious if the audience cannot c
> You cannot deploy a .clj script on a running Tomcat (yet).
In the unstable 0.8 version of Conjure, you can create a war file by
simply adding leiningen-war to your dev-dependencies and running "lein
uberwar". You can then simply drop the war file into a Tomcat server.
The web.xml file is already
On Sep 9, 6:06 pm, gary ng wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:07 PM, John Fingerhut
> wrote:
> > Some of the Haskell submissions are quite long for what they do. The
> > k-nucleotide one, for example, implements a mutable hash table using
> > features in Haskell that I had never seen before lo
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote:
> iirc the Haskell programs, and the Clean programs, and the Pascal
> programs, and ... use translations of the simple hash table used by
> the C programs.
>
> If I ever knew, I don't recall why the Haskell program does not use
> Data.HashTable
>
C
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
>>> Interesting. I don't see any real difference between macros and C
>>> preprocessor stuff and C++ templates at a conceptual level. I think
> Of course the real difference is that in Lisp macros you are working
> directly on the AST, whe
On Sep 9, 7:19 pm, gary ng wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote:
> > iirc the Haskell programs, and the Clean programs, and the Pascal
> > programs, and ... use translations of the simple hash table used by
> > the C programs.
>
> > If I ever knew, I don't recall why the Ha
(use '[clojure.contrib.server-socket :only (create-server)]
'[clojure.contrib.duck-streams :only (read-lines)])
(create-server 8080
(fn [in out] (when-not (empty? (read-lines in)) (spit out "Hello,
World!\n"
4/0/0
John
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Matt wrote:
>> You cannot deplo
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote:
> Is there any point speculating about this as outsiders?
>
> It was available - Data.HashTable seems to be copyright 2003.
>
> http://ogi.altocumulus.org/~hallgren/Programatica/tools/pfe.cgi?Data.HashTable
Huh ? point ? it was just a casual comm
Hi Phil,
I upgraded to 1.3.1 but started to experience some problems with
my our-classe-only hook. I made it return 0 since 1.3.1 expects a numeric
return code from the compile task but then ended up with other problems
in the jar task.
I want to revert to 1.3.0 for a few days. Any idea about th
Hi,
On 10 Sep., 03:11, joshua-choi wrote:
> I am running into a problem sometimes when I call a certain macro I
> defined. This problem macro (and an associated problem function) is:
>
> http://gist.github.com/572875
>
> I run into this error (which is at a call to the macro, but *not* at
> the
user> (bean (java.io.File. "tmp.txt"))
{:path "tmp.txt", :parent nil, :hidden false, :parentFile
nil, :canonicalFile #, :freeSpace 0, :absoluteFile #, :class java.io.File, :name "tmp.txt", :absolutePath
"/home/akm/src/clojure/ddsolve/tmp.txt", :directory
false, :usableSpace 0, :canonicalPath "/home
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:08:06 -0400
John Newman wrote:
> (use '[clojure.contrib.server-socket :only (create-server)]
>'[clojure.contrib.duck-streams :only (read-lines)])
> (create-server 8080
> (fn [in out] (when-not (empty? (read-lines in)) (spit out "Hello,
> World!\n"
>
> 4/0/0
On 10 Sep 2010, at 03:11, joshua-choi wrote:
And here is a full macro-expansion of the call at which the error
happens:
http://gist.github.com/572879
If I understand the comment ("the following form is the culprit...")
correctly, it's not the macroexpansion that fails, but the evaluation
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
> Do we need a direct link to the JAR on the download page? That's easy
> enough.
I think the easier the better for its adoption. If a single user has
asked for it, I'd add it (even though others might consider what's
available already as e
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Alan wrote:
> I'm not 100% sure what you're asking, but I think I understand you,
> and in that case you can refer to
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/9c7f726709e24c12/b2e2696b70d924f2?show_docid=b2e2696b70d924f2,
> in which I ask this
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
