On Sep 9, 7:19 pm, gary ng <garyng2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Isaac Gouy <igo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > iirc the Haskell programs, and the Clean programs, and the Pascal
> > programs, and ... use translations of the simple hash table used by
> > the C programs.
>
> > If I ever knew, I don't recall why the Haskell program does not use
> > Data.HashTable


> Could be that it wasn't there at the time it was submitted.

Is there any point speculating about this as outsiders?

It was available - Data.HashTable seems to be copyright 2003.

http://ogi.altocumulus.org/~hallgren/Programatica/tools/pfe.cgi?Data.HashTable


> And Data.HashTable also use some mutable array thing so it is still not
> the idiomatic Haskell of everything is immutable.

afaict idiomatic is everything referentially transparent not
everything immutable, as in - "I needed a halfway decent mutable
collection type – having a properly tested mutable collection that
actually performs well would be a godsend."

And maybe the description for this bug report says it all -

http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3149

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to