Hi,
2009/7/25 jan
>
> Laurent PETIT writes:
>
> > 2009/7/24 pcda...@gmail.com
> >
> > On Jul 23, 10:15 pm, Richard Newman wrote:
> > > > Coming from an OO background which puts a strong focus on data
> > > > encapsulation,
> > > > this makes me a little nervous.
> > >
> >
Hi people!
Thanks for the answers, Wilson, Richard.
Yesterday, I could clone the CLR branch from github (github hates my
IE7 browser, I switched to FireFox):
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-clr/tree/master
I found in the code the kind of test I was looking for. Just curious:
any attempt t
Hi people!
I have some experience with plain-vanilla Lisp (not Common Lisp or
Scheme); I have some questions about minor (or not) design decisions
in Clojure:
1) Why the fn special form receives an array as list of parameters?
That is, why Clojure is using:
(fn [x y]
instead of
(fn (x y)
Iv stumbled this also when using Threads, (http://
javadevelopmentforthemasses.blogspot.com/2009/07/easiest-singleton-
around.html)
user=> (defn singleton-factory []
(println "creating object")
(+ 1 2))
user=> (use 'clojure.contrib.singleton)
nil
user=> (def t-singleton (per-thr
Hi,
Am 25.07.2009 um 15:08 schrieb ajlopez:
1) Why the fn special form receives an array as list of parameters?
That is, why Clojure is using:
(fn [x y]
instead of
(fn (x y) ...
or both
Any rationale behing this decision?
In Clojure vectors are used everywhere, where
the grouping par
That's a general problem with multiple threads printing to the same
stream, and not something that can be easily avoided.
-Stuart
On Jul 25, 12:48 pm, ronen wrote:
> Iv stumbled this also when using Threads, (http://
> javadevelopmentforthemasses.blogspot.com/2009/07/easiest-singleton-
> around
Looking at the source ARef.java, I see that the validate method will
throw an IllegalStateException if the validator function either
returns false or throws a non-RuntimeException. The setValidator
method immediately validates the Ref using the new validator function.
It always throws a RuntimeExc
Should I use this mailing list to suggest changes to the Clojure
implementation or some other avenue?
Some suggestions I may have are pretty simple.
For example, in LockingTransaction.java I see:
ref.validate(ref.getValidator(), e.getValue());
That could be replaced by:
ref.validate(e.getValue
On Jul 25, 3:20 pm, Mark Volkmann wrote:
> Should I use this mailing list to suggest changes to the Clojure
> implementation or some other avenue?
>
> Some suggestions I may have are pretty simple.
> For example, in LockingTransaction.java I see:
>
> ref.validate(ref.getValidator(), e.getValue(
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 3:20 pm, Mark Volkmann wrote:
>> Should I use this mailing list to suggest changes to the Clojure
>> implementation or some other avenue?
>>
>> Some suggestions I may have are pretty simple.
>> For example, in LockingTransaction.j
I wonder if any of the Clojurians on here might like to describe how
one might write the factorial function as a parallel one? Taking
advantage of the associativity of multiplication, along the lines of
16! = (((1*2)*(3*4)) * ((5*6)*(7*8))) * (((9*10)*(11*12)) * ((13*14)*
(15*16)))
On Jul 24, 8
Hi
2009/7/25 ajlopez :
[...]
> from loop* to loop, let* to let, fn* to fn... Are all *-ended names
> special forms?
[...]
No, you can name your own functions/macros something* if you want to.
The * at the end normally just means that this function/macro is
similar to the one without the *, but n
The parallel library wraps the ForkJoin library scheduled for
inclusion in JDK 7:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/concurrency-interest/index.html
You'll need jsr166y.jar in your classpath in order to use this
library.
(use '(clojure.parallel))
(clojure.parallel/preduce * (range 2 16))
On Jul 26, 6:40
13 matches
Mail list logo
