Should I use this mailing list to suggest changes to the Clojure implementation or some other avenue?
Some suggestions I may have are pretty simple. For example, in LockingTransaction.java I see: ref.validate(ref.getValidator(), e.getValue()); That could be replaced by: ref.validate(e.getValue()); because the validate method in ARef.java is overloaded and the version that just takes the proposed new value uses the same validator function returned by ref.getValidator(). -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
