Quit-yo-jibber is a fork of xmpp-clj based less around direct-response
chatbots. It allows you to listen for presence changes, set availability
and status messages and send messages unprompted among other things.
It is stable and auto-reconnects if the network should drop. I use it in
two
Thanks, Tim! for a wonderful slime replacement :)
On Sunday, August 26, 2012 1:59:44 PM UTC+1, Tim King wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Shanmu >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Is there a way to disconnect/quit the repl in nrepl.el cleanly?
>>
>>
&
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Shanmu wrote:
> Hi All,
> Is there a way to disconnect/quit the repl in nrepl.el cleanly?
>
>
Hi Shanmu,
This is a open issue that has not been implemented yet.
https://github.com/kingtim/nrepl.el/issues/33
Cheers,
Tim
--
You received this mes
Hi All,
Is there a way to disconnect/quit the repl in nrepl.el cleanly?
Thanks,
Shanmu.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
> REPL would be great. Using exit-clojure or quit-clojure instead will
> continue to require the user the look up how to terminate the REPL
> somewhere, at which point they might as well read about C-d.
Not entirely - once Slime/Jline is up tab completion on qu TAB or ex
TAB would give
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Mon Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe (quit-clojure) instead of (quit)? This would save vanilla `quit'
> just in case it's needed later/elsewhere.
> Might also be nice to have (exit-clojure). Ditto saving vanilla `exit'
&g
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:31 PM, André Thieme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 30 Nov., 23:58, "Mark Volkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think you misunderstood what I was suggesting. I was only referring
>> to expressions entered in a REPL, not expressions in a file of Clojure
>> code.
>
On 30 Nov., 23:58, "Mark Volkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you misunderstood what I was suggesting. I was only referring
> to expressions entered in a REPL, not expressions in a file of Clojure
> code.
I understood that part and explained why this wouldn’t work.
Not in the REPL, not
another issue would be that your function call would have to be on one line.
(the nested ones could have multiple lines, since they'd be in parens)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To p
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:54 PM, André Thieme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 30 Nov., 19:15, "Mark Volkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Related to this is the idea that maybe the REPL should automatically
>> wrap a line without parens with t
On 30 Nov., 19:15, "Mark Volkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Related to this is the idea that maybe the REPL should automatically
> wrap a line without parens with them. That way you could just enter
> "quit" instead of "(quit)". That seems handy
Maybe (quit-clojure) instead of (quit)? This would save vanilla `quit'
just in case it's needed later/elsewhere.
Might also be nice to have (exit-clojure). Ditto saving vanilla `exit'
for other purposes
When first configuring Clojure on both linux box and windows from the
command
g, but wouldn't it be a good idea to put (defn quit
>> [] (System/exit 0)) in clojure core, just to make quitting out of the
>> REPL more obvious? Ctrl-C and Ctrl-D work too, and are actually
>> shorter to type, but having a quit function seems to be an idiomatic
>> way of
On Nov 30, 1:15 pm, "Mark Volkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Related to this is the idea that maybe the REPL should automatically
> wrap a line without parens with them. That way you could just enter
> "quit" instead of "(quit)". That seems handy
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Mark Volkmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> println "my-var is" my-var
>
> instead of
>
> (println "my-var is" my-var)
>
> It's entirely possibly I'm overlooking some reason why this is a bad idea.
I'm generally in favor of ditching parens whenever possible. I d
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Paul Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's a minor thing, but wouldn't it be a good idea to put (defn quit
> [] (System/exit 0)) in clojure core, just to make quitting out of the
> REPL more obvious? Ctrl-C and Ctrl-D work too, a
It's a minor thing, but wouldn't it be a good idea to put (defn quit
[] (System/exit 0)) in clojure core, just to make quitting out of the
REPL more obvious? Ctrl-C and Ctrl-D work too, and are actually
shorter to type, but having a quit function seems to be an idiomatic
way of gett
17 matches
Mail list logo
