Re: question about cons function

Hi Nicholas! I think the answer you're looking for is best explained by Michał in this StackOverflow post: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3008411/clojure-seq-cons-vs-list-conj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this grou

Re: question about cons function

this may help: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3008411/clojure-seq-cons-vs-list-conj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - ple

Re: question about cons function

One of the best ways to learn clojure is to take a look at the minimal and excellent source code: http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/cons (def ^{:arglists '([x seq]) :doc "Returns a new seq where x is the first element and seq is the rest." :added "1.0" :static true

Re: question about cons function

Hi Nicholas, cons returns a Cons type, which is printed like a list. Clojure> (type (cons­ 1 [])) clojure.lang.Cons Many functions that deal with collections generally return seq's, which also print like lists. See: http://clojure.org/sequences Thanks, Ambrose On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:21 AM,

question about cons function

Hello, I'm a new Closure user and I'm wondering why the 'cons' function applied on a vector returns a list. Ex: user=> (def v1 [:one :two]) #'user/v1 user=> (cons :three v1) (:three :one :two) user=> Thanks for your help, Regards, Nicolas -- You received this message because you are subscribed