On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
>
> Proper regexp highlighting would be nice, but as I mentioned, I'm not
> sure what the "correct" way to handle this may be. Are regular
> expressions actually handled specially in the reader? If not, then we
> should probably just reuse
Also, it's worth noting that my trick to highlight def-initions
probably isn't going to work if we have hierarchical parsing of S-
expressions. I'm not entirely sure how jEdit is going to handle
certain cases if we try to merge the two. It might be possible to
make it work, but I suspect that jE
> I been thinking about this during the weekend, and I think I prefer the mode
> to be aware of nesting (unless you can cause it to blow the stack on a large
Well, this would be my question: why? :-) Auto-indent needs to be
aware of nesting, but that's already handled in a separate pass from
th
I been thinking about this during the weekend, and I think I prefer the mode
to be aware of nesting (unless you can cause it to blow the stack on a large
file or something, which I think would be unlikely anyway), so I'm going to
take the keywords from your mode and bolt on the set structures I had
I've had a really quick look at your mode, it looks good, and I like the
regularity in keyword highlighting. I'm going to have a proper look sometime
later on the weekend and will get back to you when I have done.
Kind Regards,
David.
2008/12/12 Daniel Spiewak
>
> Sounds like a good plan. :-
Sounds like a good plan. :-) At the moment, I think that what's in
the mode is pretty solid, meaning I don't have anything planned to
refine it further. (except for regexp syntax, which I don't know
anything about) So, if you want to evaluate it now, that'd be great!
As a minor aside, I don't
Daniel,
To be honest, the colours are the least important, much more relevant is
that structures are recursed properly and that the base language is defined.
Let me know how you get on refining your mode and I'll have a look. When we
have agreed on something I can update the jedit patch so we hav
Which highlighting does it use?
Daniel
On Dec 12, 5:10 am, blackdog wrote:
> If anyone on this thread is interested I uploaded clj-jedit.tar.gz to
> the group file section on an incompletejeditplugin for clojure. It
> has the hilighting, repl, and namespace browser (courtesy of enclojure)
> - a
If anyone on this thread is interested I uploaded clj-jedit.tar.gz to
the group file section on an incomplete jedit plugin for clojure. It
has the hilighting, repl, and namespace browser (courtesy of enclojure)
- anyone want to take it on and improve it, I don't have time right
now?? It was based
I merged in all the interesting stuff from David Moss's Clojure jEdit
mode. We do highlight things in very different colors, but all of the
elements that his recognizes are also recognized by mine now. Also, I
fixed the annoying issue with def:
(def this)(def that)
The above now highlights cor
On Thursday 11 December 2008 12:54, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
> > Where do we find your latest version? Or do you want / need to
> > refine it further?
>
> I'm constantly messing around with it and trying to make it a little
> better. The very latest version is always here:
> http://github.com/djspie
> Where do we find your latest version? Or do you want / need to refine it
> further?
I'm constantly messing around with it and trying to make it a little
better. The very latest version is always here:
http://github.com/djspiewak/jedit-modes/tree/master/clojure.xml
Daniel
--~--~-~--~--
> Hi, just saw this thread. I had made some modifications to the edit mode and
> uploaded it for inclusion (as a patch)
> here:http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2201893&grou...
> .
>
> I haven't checked the status in a while as my internet is very intermittent
> ATM. Please
On Thursday 11 December 2008 12:54, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
> > Where do we find your latest version? Or do you want / need to
> > refine it further?
>
> I'm constantly messing around with it and trying to make it a little
> better. The very latest version is always here:
> http://github.com/djspie
Hi, just saw this thread. I had made some modifications to the edit mode and
uploaded it for inclusion (as a patch) here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2201893&group_id=588&atid=300588
.
I haven't checked the status in a while as my internet is very intermittent
ATM. Ple
On Thursday 11 December 2008 10:34, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
> It's been too long since I've looked at this thread...
>
> I took a look at the mode you linked. My mode is quite a bit more
> powerful, particularly with the changes I added today. ...
Where do we find your latest version? Or do you w
Oh, also I should mention that I found the magic incantation to make
auto-indentation work perfectly. It handles multiple unindents just
fine now.
Daniel
On Dec 11, 12:34 pm, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
> It's been too long since I've looked at this thread...
>
> I took a look at the mode you linked
It's been too long since I've looked at this thread...
I took a look at the mode you linked. My mode is quite a bit more
powerful, particularly with the changes I added today. The linked
mode does do some highlighting of special forms like @[...] that mine
doesn't do yet, mainly because I didn'
FYI, another developer has been working on an edit mode for clojure.
You can download it from
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300588&aid=2201893&group_id=588
See also this thread
http://www.nabble.com/Edit-mode-for-Clojure-ts20168077.html#a20168077
Note that the version in the j
osan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel wrote
>
> > Mostly for amusement, I created a jEdit mode for Clojure a while
> > back. I don't get a chance to play with Clojure all that much, so it
> > hasn't been heavily tested ("go-to" *is* a Clo
Daniel wrote
> Mostly for amusement, I created a jEdit mode for Clojure a while
> back. I don't get a chance to play with Clojure all that much, so it
> hasn't been heavily tested ("go-to" *is* a Clojure "keyword",
> right?). ;-) It's pri
Just thought it was about time I gave someone a heads up about this...
Mostly for amusement, I created a jEdit mode for Clojure a while
back. I don't get a chance to play with Clojure all that much, so it
hasn't been heavily tested ("go-to" *is* a Clojure "keyw
22 matches
Mail list logo
