> I been thinking about this during the weekend, and I think I prefer the mode > to be aware of nesting (unless you can cause it to blow the stack on a large
Well, this would be my question: why? :-) Auto-indent needs to be aware of nesting, but that's already handled in a separate pass from the highlighting. Besides that, there really isn't anything that requires this sort of complexity. Also, as you say, it does tend toward far less efficient highlighting in more deeply-nested S- expressions. > Will let you know when done (sometime later this week or so) so that you can > have a look. I'm also thinking that regexps should have some highlighting... > I may even push that into the Perl mode as it pisses me off greatly that > regexps don't even know about variable substitution. Proper regexp highlighting would be nice, but as I mentioned, I'm not sure what the "correct" way to handle this may be. Are regular expressions actually handled specially in the reader? If not, then we should probably just reuse the string highlighting semantics. Daniel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
