new 'Programming at the REPL' guide on clojure.org

A new guide on clojure.org, which aims at distilling years of experience using Clojure REPLs, for Clojure programmers of any experience level. https://clojure.org/guides/repl/introduction Feedback welcome! Thanks very much to everyone who participated in the genesis <https://clojureverse.

Re: Clojure.org

Thanks for the feedback! Yeggi’s post was written a long time ago and the site/mailing list have undergone quite a few changes since then. Hopefully it is better now, sometimes it is hard for those of us who have been around awhile to see rough edges. Alan -- You received this message because

Re: Clojure.org

:18 AM UTC-5, Nathan Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I'm probably dense but I didn't see the source for clojure.org on >> https://github.com/clojure. It looks like it's served out of S3 based on >> at the response headers so I'm guessing

Re: Clojure.org

t again. Alex On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 10:51:18 AM UTC-5, Nathan Fisher wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm probably dense but I didn't see the source for clojure.org on > https://github.com/clojure. It looks like it's served out of S3 based on > at the response he

Clojure.org

Hi All, I'm probably dense but I didn't see the source for clojure.org on https://github.com/clojure. It looks like it's served out of S3 based on at the response headers so I'm guessing it's a static site of some sort... While I don't necessarily subscribe to &qu

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

Great work, but I just wanted to say it doesn't look optimal on mobile. Maybe 1 item per column on most phones rather than 3? On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 11:00:12 AM UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote: > > I wanted to let people to know that we've been updating the clojure.org &g

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

On Apr 6, 2017 2:17 PM, "Luke Burton" wrote: On Apr 6, 2017, at 12:12 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: On Apr 6, 2017 2:10 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" wrote: On Apr 6, 2017 2:08 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" wrote: On Apr 6, 2017 1:55 PM, "Luke Burton" wrote: Where's Azerbaijan? Seriously, this was a fa

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

> On Apr 6, 2017, at 12:12 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > > > On Apr 6, 2017 2:10 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" > wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 2017 2:08 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" > wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 2017 1:55 PM, "Luke Burton"

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

On Apr 6, 2017 2:10 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" wrote: On Apr 6, 2017 2:08 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" wrote: On Apr 6, 2017 1:55 PM, "Luke Burton" wrote: Where's Azerbaijan? Seriously, this was a fantastic story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zM5fDN_AHY looks great. i'd like to believe it, but

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

On Apr 6, 2017 2:08 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" wrote: On Apr 6, 2017 1:55 PM, "Luke Burton" wrote: Where's Azerbaijan? Seriously, this was a fantastic story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zM5fDN_AHY looks great. i'd like to believe it, but i'm an amercn in 2017 , i buleeve nuthink. when i po

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

On Apr 6, 2017 1:55 PM, "Luke Burton" wrote: Where's Azerbaijan? Seriously, this was a fantastic story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zM5fDN_AHY looks great. i'd like to believe it, but i'm an amercn in 2017 , i buleeve nuthink. when i poke around on that link i get nuttin. maybe it's my

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

Where's Azerbaijan? Seriously, this was a fantastic story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zM5fDN_AHY > On Apr 6, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Gregg Reynolds > wrote: > > > > On Apr 6, 2017 7:12 AM, "Jon Pither" mailto:j...@

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

On Apr 6, 2017 7:12 AM, "Jon Pither" wrote: We have also maintained a set of complimentary success stories here: https://juxt.pro/clojure-in.html. The more Clojure success stories the merrier! love the i18n-ism! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clo

Re: [ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

在 2017年4月6日星期四 UTC+8下午8:12:55，Jon Pither写道： > > We have also maintained a set of complimentary success stories here: > https://juxt.pro/clojure-in.html. The more Clojure success stories the > merrier! Thank you for your great work -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

We have also maintained a set of complimentary success stories here: https://juxt.pro/clojure-in.html. The more Clojure success stories the merrier! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegr

[ANN] New Clojure story pages on clojure.org

I wanted to let people to know that we've been updating the clojure.org site to add some deeper descriptions of companies using and succeeding with Clojure: https://clojure.org/community/success_stories is a port of the success stories that were previously hosted on the Cognitect web

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Shoot, that was not the link I meant. I meant: http://clojure.org/community/contributing_site On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 4:33:14 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > Well there's a whole page about it at the link mentioned in the message > below - https://github.com/clojure/cloj

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

59 PM UTC-5, Alan Thompson wrote: > > Alex - I could not find a link to the Clojure.org github project on the > clojure.org site. Should one be added under "Contributing" somewhere? > Alan > > On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45:06 AM UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote: >>

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Alex - I could not find a link to the Clojure.org github project on the clojure.org site. Should one be added under "Contributing" somewhere? Alan On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45:06 AM UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote: > > The new http://clojure.org is alive! > > Most of the

[DOCS] clojure.org Feb update

I've been meaning to do an update on clojure.org, now that it's been a little over a month since we switched over to the new site. I'm very happy with everything I've seen on the operational side - the Clojure web site has had much less down time than the old host, is se

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

-httpsssl-sites-199446). > On 26 Jan 2016, at 03:52, Alex Miller wrote: > > You can now access https://clojure.org, thanks for the push. > > On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 2:25:42 PM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > Noted, I will bump it up the priority list. > > On Thursda

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

You can now access https://clojure.org, thanks for the push. On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 2:25:42 PM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > Noted, I will bump it up the priority list. > > On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 1:49:55 PM UTC-6, Laurens Van Houtven > wrote: >> >>

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Reid, thanks very much for the explanation, and thanks for all of the work. Knowing that the docstrings may be different on Grimoire is very helpful. On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 1:54:48 PM UTC-6, Reid McKenzie wrote: > > Grimoire was originally built to replace ClojureDocs when it had been

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Reid, Thanks for the explanation - I did not realize the differences. I've been landing on clojuredocs primarily due to page rank but will be sure to include/check grimoire because I want/need the enhanced doc strings. Terseness is great when you are an expert but I'm not there yet and can still

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Grimoire was originally built to replace ClojureDocs when it had been inactive for some time, and as it turns out mere months prior to the big update which is now live. That I continue to operate Grimoire now that ClojureDocs has been updated is I suppose competition at some level. Yes ClojureDocs

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 6:24:06 PM UTC-6, Reid McKenzie wrote: > > That this is an afterthought I suppose indicates my priorities, but if you > have particular complaints about the present design of Grimoire I'd be > delighted to hear them over on the bugtracker [1]. I'm well aware that

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

That this is an afterthought I suppose indicates my priorities, but if you have particular complaints about the present design of Grimoire I'd be delighted to hear them over on the bugtracker [1]. I'm well aware that Grimoire lacks some amount of UI/web N+1 polish, however as I'm no UI/UX expert pr

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Okay. Thanks for the quick reply Alex. Reid On 01/18/2016 05:39 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > Actually, I was using an old version of the cheatsheet and have updated. > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Reid McKenzie > wrote: > > Hum... if this is true it's because

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Actually, I was using an old version of the cheatsheet and have updated. On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Reid McKenzie wrote: > Hum... if this is true it's because I've diverged from Andy's cheatsheet > builds and haven't synced back up. Grimoire has 1.7 content and will > promptly support 1.8.

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Hum... if this is true it's because I've diverged from Andy's cheatsheet builds and haven't synced back up. Grimoire has 1.7 content and will promptly support 1.8. Looking into this. Reid On 01/15/2016 02:36 PM, Mars0i wrote: > I like the new look a lot. Thanks. > > One comment: The cheatsheet n

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 2:36:46 PM UTC-6, Mars0i wrote: > > I like the new look a lot. Thanks. > > One comment: The cheatsheet now links to Grimoire pages that seem to be > for Clojure 1.6.0. The old default cheatsheet linked to ClojureDocs, which > looks better and includes a few more u

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

>> experienced programmers. >> >> >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 7:16:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Moore wrote: >>> >>> Great job everyone! I really like the layout and the color scheme, very >>> pleasing to the eye and professional looking. >>>

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

rs. > > > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 7:16:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Moore wrote: >> >> Great job everyone! I really like the layout and the color scheme, very >> pleasing to the eye and professional looking. >> >> My *only* constructive comment is that a total newbi

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

enced programmers. On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 7:16:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Moore wrote: > > Great job everyone! I really like the layout and the color scheme, very > pleasing to the eye and professional looking. > > My *only* constructive comment is that a total newbie landing on &g

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

+1 Looks good. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: > Great work! This was long overdue, but I'm extremely happy we made this > solid first step! > > On 15 January 2016 at 04:11, Eunmin Kim wrote: > >> Great!! >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Great job everyone! I really like the layout and the color scheme, very pleasing to the eye and professional looking. My *only* constructive comment is that a total newbie landing on clojure.org is faced with a lot of reading when maybe they should be presented with super basic code examples

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

I like the new look a lot. Thanks. One comment: The cheatsheet now links to Grimoire pages that seem to be for Clojure 1.6.0. The old default cheatsheet linked to ClojureDocs, which looks better and includes a few more useful features, such as links to related functions and to the source. --

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Great work! This was long overdue, but I'm extremely happy we made this solid first step! On 15 January 2016 at 04:11, Eunmin Kim wrote: > Great!! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Great!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

involved take a bow. I'm ashamed I haven't contributed anything to it. I vow to remedy that in the new year. Congratulations to every involved, and the community. On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45:06 AM UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote: > > The new http://clojure.org is alive! &

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

ransition into the new structure really): > - http://clojure.org/guides/getting_started - has a ton of things at the > end, including clojuredocs > - http://clojure.org/community/resources - more obvious and presumably > what you're referring to > > I'm going to clean this up a

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Hi Ritchie, There are actually two different places where "resources" exist (just a by-product of the transition into the new structure really): - http://clojure.org/guides/getting_started - has a ton of things at the end, including clojuredocs - http://clojure.org/community/resour

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Noted, I will bump it up the priority list. On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 1:49:55 PM UTC-6, Laurens Van Houtven wrote: > > Hi, > > On Jan 14, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > > The clojure.org has never, and does not now, support https. It is an > entirely stat

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Amazing. I really like the clean and minimalistic design. Congratulations! On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 4:45:06 PM UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote: > > The new http://clojure.org is alive! > > Most of the content on the site is the same content as before (but in a > new shinier pa

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Hi, > On Jan 14, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Alex Miller <mailto:a...@puredanger.com>> wrote: > > The clojure.org <http://clojure.org/> has never, and does not now, support > https. It is an entirely static site, so it is not high on my priority list > to work on. Sure

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

ller wrote: > > The new http://clojure.org is alive! > > Most of the content on the site is the same content as before (but in a > new shinier package). However, the site is now sourced from the public repo > at https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site and is open for contribution

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

The clojure.org has never, and does not now, support https. It is an entirely static site, so it is not high on my priority list to work on. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.cc> wrote: > Huge fan of the redesign! Unfortunately HTTPS is still broken, servi

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

of Alex Miller > mailto:a...@puredanger.com>> > Reply-To: Clojure Mailing List <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>> > Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45 AM > To: Clojure Mailing List <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>> > Subject: [ANN] New clojure.org! >

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Clojure Mailing List on behalf of Alex Miller Reply-To: Clojure Mailing List Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45 AM To: Clojure Mailing List Subject: [ANN] New clojure.org! The new http://clojure.org is alive! Most of the content on the site is the same content as before (but in a new

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

The new website is great ! Cheers, Jeremy. On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:08:41 PM UTC+1, Colin Yates wrote: > > +1 this is really great. > > > On 14 Jan 2016, at 16:07, Stephen Gilardi > > wrote: > > > > +1 great fresh look and process! > > > >> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Marc O'Mo

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

+1 this is really great. > On 14 Jan 2016, at 16:07, Stephen Gilardi wrote: > > +1 great fresh look and process! > >> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Marc O'Morain wrote: >> >> Very nice! Good job all. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Cloju

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

+1 great fresh look and process! > On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Marc O'Morain wrote: > > Very nice! Good job all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from ne

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Very nice! Good job all. On 14 January 2016 at 15:45, Alex Miller wrote: > The new http://clojure.org is alive! > > Most of the content on the site is the same content as before (but in a > new shinier package). However, the site is now sourced from the public repo > at htt

[ANN] New clojure.org!

The new http://clojure.org is alive! Most of the content on the site is the same content as before (but in a new shinier package). However, the site is now sourced from the public repo at https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site and is open for contribution. Contributions (via pull request

clojure.org is currently down

The underlying host (wikispaces.com) is having issues and have not been having much luck with support, so no ETA. I cannot wait to switch over to the new clojure.org site!!! Soon. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To po

[Docs] Help needed on clojure.org guides

Hello all, just wanted to mention a few easy places that someone could help out if they're interested. There are two excellent guides that Andy Fingerhut has written in the past on comparators and hash/equality stuff. Andy has given the ok to contribute those guides onto the new clojur

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

ted a programming language? It must either be insanely great or idealistic but unpractical. I went to the clojure.org website and thought: Oh, so he created the website for it as well (I think that is not true but that is what I thought), concluded that the language can't be very popular and pro

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

or another language. The content > and learning gradient in those books can be steep and could put off a > beginner. Although Clojure is such an advanced language, I think it's > possible to implant programming concepts in a complete beginner by using a > subset of Clojure. But may

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

ntent and learning > gradient in those books can be steep and could put off a beginner. Although > Clojure is such an advanced language, I think it's possible to implant > programming concepts in a complete beginner by using a subset of Clojure. But > maybe the the clojure.org Webs

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

learning gradient in those books can be steep and could put off a beginner. Although Clojure is such an advanced language, I think it's possible to implant programming concepts in a complete beginner by using a subset of Clojure. But maybe the the clojure.org Website is not the right place for

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 10:27:34 AM UTC-6, Nelson Morris wrote: > > Is there a list of reviewers and editors? > In the interest of getting this public, I did not wait to figure out all the details of the review and editing process before we made the announcement. I am hoping to get a

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

happy to announce a new initiative to > replace the existing http://clojure.org site. The new site will contain > most of the existing reference and information content but will also > provide an opportunity for additional guides or tutorials about Clojure and > its ecosystem. > &

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

Yes, all of the instructions point you to a stable build of JBake 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT. There is, in particular, a fix coming in 2.5.0 that allows us to output files with no extension so that urls look like http://clojure.org/reader instead of http://clojure.org/reader.html. When 2.5 is released

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

All set here! Just to point out that the site generation didn't work with JBake v2.4.0 (latest stable). So, if you already use JBake, you will have to upgrade it to v2.5.0-SNAPSHOT, as suggested in the README file. On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Dmitri wrote: > Just a note that the author of C

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

Just a note that the author of Cryogen is very responsive regarding discussions on improvements and pull requests for additional functionality. If there's a particular feature that's missing it might be worth creating an issue or opening a pr for it. On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 10:57:45 AM

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

Link was bad - sorry! https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site/blob/master/content/community/contributing_site.adoc On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 10:45:59 AM UTC-6, Alan Forrester wrote: > > The site contribution page does not seem to be up. > > > Alan > -- You received this message because

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

replace the existing http://clojure.org <http://clojure.org/> site. The new > site will contain most of the existing reference and information content but > will also provide an opportunity for additional guides or tutorials about > Clojure and its ecosystem. > > The new s

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

Thanks for clarifying that Alex. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > Hi Hildeberto, > > I built spikes of the site in a number of technologies like Cryogen, > Stasis, Sphinx, Asciidoctor, and some of the other Ruby-based static > generators as well. In the end, I found that JBa

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

Hi Hildeberto, I built spikes of the site in a number of technologies like Cryogen, Stasis, Sphinx, Asciidoctor, and some of the other Ruby-based static generators as well. In the end, I found that JBake was the best match for our goals at this time. The site build architecture has been decided

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

ation for the language >> and the ecosystem. With that in mind, we are happy to announce a new >> initiative to replace the existing http://clojure.org site. The new site >> will contain most of the existing reference and information content but >> will also provide an oppo

Re: [ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

lex Miller wrote: > The Clojure community is full of talented writers and valuable experience, > and together we can create great documentation for the language and the > ecosystem. With that in mind, we are happy to announce a new initiative to > replace the existing http://clojure.org s

[ANN] Let's make clojure.org better!

The Clojure community is full of talented writers and valuable experience, and together we can create great documentation for the language and the ecosystem. With that in mind, we are happy to announce a new initiative to replace the existing http://clojure.org site. The new site will contain

Re: Is there a table of content for the whole clojure.org website?

he topics? There are certain topics under Rationale, > others under Documentation. Is there one common TOC? > > Just wanted something like single.html where all the docs are so I could > start picking topics which seem most interesting. Obviously the other > option is usin

Is there a table of content for the whole clojure.org website?

search for Clojure.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from

Re: spam on clojure.org

clojure.org does no such thing, sounds like it's time to do a virus sweep. Reid On 03/29/2015 05:14 AM, Otto Linnemann wrote: I have just noticed a lot of spam (online gambling and stuff like that) where clojure.org redirects too which I find incredible annoying since I use clojur

spam on clojure.org

I have just noticed a lot of spam (online gambling and stuff like that) where clojure.org redirects too which I find incredible annoying since I use clojure.org frequently e.g. as API reference. Has clojure.org hacked or is it intentional so? Best Regards, Otto -- You received this message

Re: Updates to cheat sheet at clojure.org/cheatsheet

the top of http://clojure.org/cheatsheet Andy On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Bruce Wang wrote: > There are http://cljs.info/cheatsheet/ > > from the commit logs on https://github.com/oakmac/cljs.info it's less > than 4 days old > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:22 AM, gvim

Re: Updates to cheat sheet at clojure.org/cheatsheet

version published >> at http://clojure.org/cheatsheet >> >> It was updated from v13 to v21. If you are curious what changes have >> been made between those versions, you can read the change log here: >> https://github.com/jafingerhut/clojure-cheatsheets/blob/master/src

Re: Updates to cheat sheet at clojure.org/cheatsheet

On 05/02/2015 20:46, Andy Fingerhut wrote: I'm happy to host an updated ClojureScript cheat sheet, and give technical help and advice to anyone wanting to update it. As I don't use ClojureScript myself (at least not yet), I don't have the motivation to update it myself. Andy Sorry if my repl

Re: Updates to cheat sheet at clojure.org/cheatsheet

> On 05/02/2015 17:04, Andy Fingerhut wrote: > >> Thanks to Alex Miller, who has updated the cheat sheet version published >> at http://clojure.org/cheatsheet >> >> It was updated from v13 to v21. If you are curious what changes have >> been made between those v

Re: Updates to cheat sheet at clojure.org/cheatsheet

On 05/02/2015 17:04, Andy Fingerhut wrote: Thanks to Alex Miller, who has updated the cheat sheet version published at http://clojure.org/cheatsheet It was updated from v13 to v21. If you are curious what changes have been made between those versions, you can read the change log here: https

Updates to cheat sheet at clojure.org/cheatsheet

Thanks to Alex Miller, who has updated the cheat sheet version published at http://clojure.org/cheatsheet It was updated from v13 to v21. If you are curious what changes have been made between those versions, you can read the change log here: https://github.com/jafingerhut/clojure-cheatsheets

Re: clojure.org uses a wikispaces TLS certificate

On 22 Sep 2014, at 17:30, Alex Miller wrote: > It is likely that at some point in the future, clojure.org will be hosted > elsewhere. For now, this doesn't seem to be a high priority to address so I > don't plan to do anything about it (presumably it would be di

Re: clojure.org uses a wikispaces TLS certificate

It is likely that at some point in the future, clojure.org will be hosted elsewhere. For now, this doesn't seem to be a high priority to address so I don't plan to do anything about it (presumably it would be difficult to do so). On Monday, September 22, 2014 7:02:06 AM UTC-5, L

Re: clojure.org uses a wikispaces TLS certificate

Hi Alex, On 20 Sep 2014, at 20:20, Alex Miller wrote: > Clojure.org is hosted on wikispaces. For what purpose would you access it by > https? It’s not a (purposeful) choice; my browser is configured to access any site that supports it over HTTPS. Since this is intentional, I have

clojure.org uses a wikispaces TLS certificate

Clojure.org is hosted on wikispaces. For what purpose would you access it by https? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderate

clojure.org uses a wikispaces TLS certificate

Hi! clojure.org presents a bogus certificate when you attempt to reach it over HTTPS. The cert it provides has *.wikispaces.com as a CN, but is otherwise fine. My apologies if there's a better place to report this; I couldn't find it. hth lvh -- You received this message becau

Re: http://clojure.org/ link to CLR links old git

Fixed. On Sunday, May 11, 2014 9:50:54 PM UTC-5, JP Bader wrote: > > Shouldn't the link be updated to https://github.com/clojure/clojure-clr? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.

http://clojure.org/ link to CLR links old git

Shouldn't the link be updated to https://github.com/clojure/clojure-clr? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient w

Re: Clojure.org: Concurrency screencast 404

Yeah, I found it. :) On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 10:21:24 AM UTC-6, Abhijith wrote: > > Oh. Looks like the link has been updated already. Missed that earlier. > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:49 PM, abhi >wrote: > >> http://clojure.org/concurrent_programming >

Re: Clojure.org: Concurrency screencast 404

Oh. Looks like the link has been updated already. Missed that earlier. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:49 PM, abhi wrote: > http://clojure.org/concurrent_programming > > Apologies for the delayed response. > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Alex Miller wrote: > >&

Re: Clojure.org: Concurrency screencast 404

http://clojure.org/concurrent_programming Apologies for the delayed response. On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Alex Miller wrote: > Which page had the link? > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. &

Re: Clojure.org: Concurrency screencast 404

Which page had the link? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from th

Re: Clojure.org: Concurrency screencast 404

That's the one I was looking for. Thanks! Is there a place I can file this as an issue so that the website points to the right one? On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Alex Miller wrote: > blip.tv killed the Clojure account. Many of the videos were moved to > YouTube under the ClojureTV account:

Re: Clojure.org: Concurrency screencast 404

blip.tv killed the Clojure account. Many of the videos were moved to YouTube under the ClojureTV account: http://www.youtube.com/user/ClojureTV I suspect this is the talk you're referring to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGVqrGmwOAw On Monday, December 16, 2013 2:44:53 AM UTC-6, Abhijith wro

Re: Clojure.org: Concurrency screencast 404

On a related note, why is the 301 "Moved Permanently" HTTP status never used in actual practice? Instead, when things move you always get 404s and have to hunt them down manually. :P On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:44 AM, abhi wrote: > Hello, >Concurrency screencast link to blip.tv is throwing a

Clojure.org: Concurrency screencast 404

Hello, Concurrency screencast link to blip.tv is throwing a 404. Is this a temporary thing or has it moved permanently? > Most of this is covered in more detail in the concurrency > screencast . -- Queer little twists and quirks go into the making of an individual

Re: What font is used for Clojure on clojure.org?

Where I'm from the notion of cider in a champagne glass is a little ludicrous. =) But I guess maybe they're thinking of an alcoholic cider, and I'm thinking more of the winter holiday season spiced warm cider in a mug?? On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Tim Visher wrote: > Cider _is_ nrepl.el at

Re: What font is used for Clojure on clojure.org?

Cider _is_ nrepl.el at this point, essentially, so any screencast documenting nrepl.el would get you most of the way there. Also, Cider is _unstable_ at this point. I'm still using nrepl 0.2.0 and it's working fine. I would _not_ recommend upgrading to Cider at this point. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at

Re: What font is used for Clojure on clojure.org?

And what about the screencasts? On Nov 7, 2013 8:34 AM, "Tim Visher" wrote: > It's funny that in the comments bbatsov and I have already explored > this space a bit. :) > > It seems like everyone has a different experience of drinking cider. > I've never drank cider in anything but cups or mugs,

  1   2   3   >